Simulation of the transmission dynamics of sporotrichosis in cats using the SI epidemiological model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X87105Keywords:
Sporotrichosis, Incidence, Epidemic, susceptible infected mathematical modelAbstract
Sporotrichosis is an emerging and neglected mycosis with a worldwide distribution. In Brazil, a zoonotic epidemic is occurring, with two epicenters identified in the states of Rio de Janeiro and Rio Grande do Sul. However, little is known about the dynamics of this epidemic. In the present work, the incidence rate of the disease was calculated, and the SI (Susceptible Infected) mathematical model was employed to elucidate the epidemiological parameters and the epidemic curve of sporotrichosis in cats. Data from the urban area of Pelotas, the main city affected by sporotrichosis in southern Brazil, and secondary data from the main veterinary mycological diagnostic laboratory in the region were utilized. Through the results obtained, an average incidence rate of 79 cases per 100,000 cats was found, and R0 of 1.45 (basic reproduction number) was determined, indicating that the epidemic is in its exponential phase. It was confirmed that the SI mathematical model was capable of inferring fundamental parameters of the dynamics and dissemination of sporotrichosis, and can be used as a tool for predicting the progression of this disease. As a consequence of the results found, we present an epidemiological scenario that necessitates immediate intervention with measures to contain the spread of this epidemic.
Downloads
References
Barnacle, J. R., Chow, Y. J., Borman, A. M., Wyllie, S., Dominguez, V., Russell, K., Roberts, H., Armstrong-James, D., Whittington, A. M. (2022). The first three reported cases of sporothrix brasiliensis cat-transmitted sporotrichosis outside south america. Med Mycol Case Rep, 39, 14–17.
Cori, A., Ferguson, N. M., Fraser, C., Cauchemez, S. (2013). A new framework and software to estimate time-varying reproduction numbers during epidemics. American Journal of Epidemiology, 178(9), 1505–1512.
Delamater, P. L., Street, E. J., Leslie, T. F., Jacobsen, K. H. (2019). Complexity of the basic reproduction number (r0). Emerging Infectious Disease, 25(1), 1–4.
Ferreira, M. L. (2021). Modelagem matemática em dinâmica da população como uma estratégia no ensino da matemática.
Gremião, I. D. F., Miranda, L. H. M., Reis, E. G., Rodrigues, A. M., Pereira, S. A. (2017). Zoonotic epidemic of sporotrichosis: cat to human transmission. PlosPathog, 13(1), 1–7.
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2019a). Indicadores sociais municipais – 2010. URL https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/rs/pelotas/pesquisa/23/25124, acessado em 04/05/19.
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2019b). População de animais de estimação no brasil – 2013. URL https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/camaras-setoriais-tematicas/documentos/camaras-tematicas/insumos-agropecuarios/
anos-anteriores/ibge-populacao-de-animais-de-estimacao-no-brasil-2013-abinpet-79.pdf/view, acessado em 04/05/19.
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2020). Indicadores sociais municipais – 2010. URL https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/rs/rio-grande/pesquisa/23/25124, acessado em 10/10/20.
Keeling, M. J., Rohani, P. (2007). Modeling infectious diseases in humans and animals. Princeton University Press.
Pereira, S. B., Gomes, A. R., Waller, S. B., Xavier, J. R. B., Rodrigues, A. M., Ripoll, M. K., Ferreira, M. R. A., Conceição, F. R., Faria, R. O., Bruhn, F. R. P. (2022). Sporotrichosis in dogs: epidemiological and clinical-therapeutic profile and the emergence of itraconazole-resistant isolates. Med Mycol, 60(12).
Rabello, V. B. S., Almeida, M. A., Bernardes-Engemann, A. R., Almeida-Paes, R., de Macedo, P. M., Zancopé-Oliveira, R. M. (2022). The historical burden of sporotrichosis in brazil: a systematic review of cases reported from 1907 to 2020. Braz J Microbiol, 53(1), 231–244.
Rodrigues, A. M., Hoog, G. S., Camargo, Z. P. (2016). Sporothrix species causing outbreaks in animals and humans driven by animal – animal transmission. PLOS Pathogens, 12(7).
Sanchotene, K. O., Madrid, I. M., KLAFKE, G. B., Bergamashi, M., Della Terra, P. P., Rodrigues, A. M., de Camargo, Z. P., Xavier, M. O. (2015). Sporothrixbrasiliensis outbreaks and the rapid emergence of feline sporotrichosis. Mycoses, 58, 652–658.
Thompson, R. N., Stockwin, J. E., Van Gaalen, R. D., Polonsky, J. A., Kamvar, Z. N., Demarsh, P. A., Dahlqwist, E., Li, S., Miguel, Jombart, E. T., Lessler, J., Cauchemez, S., Cori, A. (2019). Improved inference of time-varying reproduction numbers during infectious disease outbreaks. Epidemics, 29.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.