Mapping of pathological manifestations on a building facade with mortar coating at the Federal University of Santa Maria - Campus Cachoeira do Sul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X87082Keywords:
Mortar coating, Phatological manifestations on facades, Damage mappingAbstract
The exposure of mortar-coating facades to climatic agents can result in the development of pathological manifestations. The facade is part of the external vertical sealing system, with a fundamental function not only aesthetically but also as protection against weather, acoustic, and thermal barriers for the interior of the building. It should be noted that the deterioration of the mortar coating involves physical, mechanical, chemical, and biological factors, requiring detailed project specifications, considering the local exposure conditions of each building facade. The objective of this work was to analyze the facade of the D1 building of the Federal University of Santa Maria - Cachoeira do Sul, using part of the degradation measurement method (MMD). The south facade stands out with the biggest extent of pathological manifestations, followed by the east and north facades, with the west facade having the smallest damaged area. Among the manifestations present, fissures stand out as the most predominant in all cardinal orientations. This work highlights the need to understand degradation processes over time to guarantee the performance of facade coverings, maintenance plans, and consequently, the durability of the building.
Downloads
References
ANTUNES, G. R. Estudo de Manifestações Patológicas em Revestimentos de Fachada em Brasília – Sistematização da Incidência de Casos. 2010. 199 p. Dissertação (Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental) – Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2010.
BAUER, E.; FREITAS, V. P de.; MUSTELIER, N.; BARREIRA, E. Infrared thermography – evaluation of the results reproducibility. Structural Survey, v. 33, n. 1, p. 20–35, 2015.
CARASEK, H. Patologia das Argamassas de Revestimento. In: IN: ISAIA, G. C. (ORG. ). (Ed.). . Materiais de Construção e Princípios de Ciência e Engenharia de Materiais. IBRACON ed. São Paulo: [s.n.]. p. 1–11, 2007.
FLORES-COLEN, I.; BRITO, J. DE; FREITAS, V. P. DE. Métodos de Verificação do Desempenho em Serviço de Fachadas Rebocadas. Conference: 3º Encontro Nacional sobre Patologia e Reabilitação de Edifícios, Patorreb 2009, FEUP, At Porto, Portugal, 2009.
FREITAS, S. S. DE; FREITAS, V. P. D.; BARREIRA, E. Detection of façade plaster detachments using infrared thermography - A nondestructive technique. Construction and Building Materials, v. 70, p. 80–87, 2014.
GASPAR, P. L.; BRITO, J. DE. Damage Atlas Cementrendered Facades. In: FREITAS, V. P. DE (Ed.). A STATE-OF-THE-ART REPORT ON BUILDING PATHOLOGYCIB – W086 BUILDING PATHOLOGY. Porto University, Faculty of Engineering. CIB – International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction:p. 200, 2013.
IBGE. Cidades. Disponível em: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/rs/cachoeira-do-sul. Acesso em: janeiro, 2024.
MENEZES, A.; GOMES, M. G.; FLORES-COLEN, I. In-situ assessment of physical performance and degradation analysis of rendering walls. Construction and Building Materials v. 75, p. 283–292, 2015.
MOTA, Larissa Mara Gonçalves. Estudo da iniciação e da propagação da degradação de fachadas com revestimento em argamassa. 2021. 179 f., il. Dissertação (Mestrado em Estruturas e Construção Civil) — Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2021.
NASCIMENTO, M. L. M. Aplicação da Simulação Higrotérmica na Investigação da Degradação de Fachadas de Edifícios. 2016. 173 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Civil e Ambiental) – Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2016.
PAVON, E. Critérios e padrões de comportamento para avaliação de descolamentos cerâmicos com termografia de infravermelho. 2017. 250 p. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Civil e Ambiental) - Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2017.
PINHEIRO, P. I. S. Aplicação do Método de Mensuração da Degradação (MMD) ao Estudo das Fachadas de Edifícios em Brasília. 2016. Trabalho de Graduação (Engenharia Civil) – Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2016.
PIAZZAROLLO, C. B. Estudo da Evolução e da Gravidade da Degradação nas Diferentes Zonas Componentes da Fachada. 2019. 152 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Estruturas e Construção Civil) - Universidade de Brasília, 2019.
POYASTRO, P. Influência da volumetria e das condições de entorno da edificação no manchamento e infiltração de água em fachadas por ação de chuva dirigida. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Civil) – Escola de Engenharia Civil: UFRGS, Porto Alegre, 2011.
SILVA, M. de N. B. da. Avaliação Quantitativa da Degradação e Vida Útil de Revestimentos de Fachada – Aplicação ao caso de Brasília/DF. 2014. 217 f. Tese (Doutorado em Estruturas e Construção Civil) Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2014.
SOCOLOSKI, R. F. Indicadores para Avaliação de Anomalias em Fachadas com Revestimento de Argamassa. 2021. 257 p. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Civil: Construção e Infraestrutura) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2021.
STOLZ, C. M. Análise Dos Principais Parâmetros Que Influenciam Na Área De Contato Substrato / Argamassa De Revestimento. 2015. 206 p. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Civil) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2015.
ZUCCHETTI, L. Influência das características do peitoril no molhamento dos parâmetros próximos às janelas frente à chuva dirigida. 2016. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Civil) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
