Digital manufacturing technology for producing manipulable teaching materials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X86936Keywords:
Manipulable learning materials, Digital manufacturing, Sustainable processAbstract
This paper presents the development process of a set of Manipulable Learning Materials - MLM made from digital manufacturing leftover materials. It also shows the benefits from the use of such materials in public elementary school classrooms. The methodology adopted included the creation of a working group involving teachers from elementary schools, researchers from a university and a student from an undergraduate course in Architecture and Urban Planning. The demand for materials was organized by school teachers, while the group of researchers, with the student support, was responsible for preparing the design and manufacturing of the MLM through a digital manufacturing process. As a result, several MLM were created and used in the classroom. There were improvements in the learning process through the employment of the MLM produced, and possible improvements to MLM were identified.
Downloads
References
OLIVEIRA, A. A. A.; SAKURAI, T. Fabricação digital e DIY: Pesquisa de soluções para a criação de um mobiliário nômade. In: XXI Congreso de la Sociedad Ibero-americana de Gráfica Digital, 2017, Chile. Anais SIGRADI, 2017. p. 22 – 24.
RODRIGUES, F. C.; GAZIRE, E. S. Reflexões sobre uso de material didático manipulável no ensino de matemática: da ação experimental à reflexão. REVEMAT: Revista Eletrônica de Matemática, v. 7, n. 2, p. 187-196, 2012.
SCOLARO, M. A. O uso dos Materiais Didáticos Manipuláveis como recurso pedagógico nas aulas de Matemática. Secretaria da Educação - PR. Disponível em http://www.diaadiaeducacao.pr.gov.br/portals/pde/arquivos/1666-8.pdf. Acesso em: 16 ago. 2023.
SILVA, V. F. S.; COSTA, M. L. C. A geometria nas séries iniciais: explorando materiais didáticos manipuláveis. In: Encontro Nacional de Educação Matemática, 2016, São Paulo-SP. Anais do XII ENEM, 2016. p. 1-10.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
