Accuracy analysis of mapping land use and occupation using Sentinel-2 and CBERS-4 images in the surroundings of a reservoirs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X84730Keywords:
Remote Sensing, Machine Learning, Pedro Mauro Junior ReservoirAbstract
Detecting changes in land cover helps policymakers understand the dynamics of environmental changes to ensure sustainable development in the Caatinga biome. Thus, the identification of spatial characteristics by Remote Sensing has emerged as an important aspect of research, and, therefore, adequate and efficient methodology for mapping the necessary land cover is a preponderant factor. In this study, data from the Sentinel-2 and CBERS-4 satellites captured by the MultiSpectral Instrument (MSI) and Panchromatic and Multispectral Camera (PAN) sensors, respectively, were used for classification and accuracy analysis for five land cover classes around dams located in the municipality of Belo Jardim, Pernambuco. The KNN algorithm (K-th nearest neighbor) with a value of k=1 was used for image training and classification. Recent high-resolution images from the European program WorldCover were used as a spatial and thematic reference image. After the Contingency Matrix analysis between the land cover maps and the reference data, an overall accuracy of 57.4% was obtained for the MSI and 54.5% for the PAN product. The results obtained showed that the MSI presented more satisfactory land cover maps than the PAN data. On the other hand, for the shrubby vegetation class, the PAN product presented an r of 0.5, while the MSI had an r of 0.47. Spatial and spectral characteristics of the images were the main causes of the variability found in the thematic accuracy coefficients.
Downloads
References
ACHARKI, Siham. PlanetScope contributions compared to Sentinel-2, and Landsat-8 for LULC mapping. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, [S.L.], v. 27, p. 100774, ago. 2022. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2022.100774
APAC. Agência Pernambucana de Águas e Clima. Disponível em: http://www.sirh.srh.pe.gov.br/apac/, 2019.
ANNATHURAI, Kalyana Saravanan; ANGAMUTHU, Tamilarasi. Sorensen-dice similarity indexing based weighted iterative clustering for big data analytics. Int. Arab J. Inf. Technol., v. 19, n. 1, p. 11-22, 2022.
BANGIRA, Tsitsi; ALFIERI, Silvia Maria; MENENTI, Massimo; VAN NIEKERK, Adriaan. Comparing Thresholding with Machine Learning Classifiers for Mapping Complex Water. Remote Sensing, [S.L.], v. 11, n. 11, p. 1351, 5 jun. 2019. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs11111351
CONGALTON, Russell G.. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing Of Environment, [S.L.], v. 37, n. 1, p. 35-46, jul. 1991. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-b
ESA. European Space Agency. Sentinel-2: Resolution and Swath, 2021. Available online: https://sentinel.esa.int/web/sentinel/missions/sentinel-2/instrument-payload/resolution-and-swath
FENG, Senyao; LI, Wenlong; XU, Jing; LIANG, Tiangang; MA, Xuanlong; WANG, Wenying; YU, Hongyan. Land Use/Land Cover Mapping Based on GEE for the Monitoring of Changes in Ecosystem Types in the Upper Yellow River Basin over the Tibetan Plateau. Remote Sensing, [S.L.], v. 14, n. 21, p. 5361, 26 out. 2022. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs14215361
GIBRIL, Mohamed Barakat A.; BAKAR, Suzana A.; YAO, Kouame; IDREES, Mohammed Oludare; PRADHAN, Biswajeet. Fusion of RADARSAT-2 and multispectral optical remote sensing data for LULC extraction in a tropical agricultural area. Geocarto International, [S.L.], v. 32, n. 7, p. 735-748, 15 abr. 2016. Informa UK Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1170893
GIGLIO, Louis; BOSCHETTI, Luigi; ROY, David P.; HUMBER, Michael L.; JUSTICE, Christopher O.. The Collection 6 MODIS burned area mapping algorithm and product. Remote Sensing of Environment, [S.L.], v. 217, p. 72-85, nov. 2018. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.005
GONÇALVES, Rogério Victor S.; CARDOSO, João Custódio F.; OLIVEIRA, Paulo Eugênio; OLIVEIRA, Denis Coelho. Changes in the Cerrado vegetation structure: insights from more than three decades of ecological succession. Web Ecology, [S.L.], v. 21, n. 1, p. 55-64, 30 mar. 2021. Copernicus GmbH. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/we-21-55-2021
HU, Bin; XU, Yongyang; HUANG, Xiao; CHENG, Qimin; DING, Qing; BAI, Linze; LI, Yan. Improving Urban Land Cover Classification with Combined Use of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-1 Imagery. ISPRS International Journal Of Geo-Information, [S.L.], v. 10, n. 8, p. 533, 9 ago. 2021. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10080533.
KUHN, Max. The caret package. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://cran. r-project. org/package= caret, 2012.
LI, Congcong; WANG, Jie; WANG, Lei; HU, Luanyun; GONG, Peng. Comparison of Classification Algorithms and Training Sample Sizes in Urban Land Classification with Landsat Thematic Mapper Imagery. Remote Sensing, [S.L.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 964-983, 24 jan. 2014. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs6020964
LIU, Qingsheng; SONG, Hongwei; LIU, Gaohuan; HUANG, Chong; LI, He. Evaluating the Potential of Multi-Seasonal CBERS-04 Imagery for Mapping the Quasi-Circular Vegetation Patches in the Yellow River Delta Using Random Forest. Remote Sensing, [S.L.], v. 11, n. 10, p. 1216, 22 maio 2019. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs11101216
METTERNICHT, G.I; ZINCK, J.A. Remote sensing of soil salinity: potentials and constraints. Remote Sensing of Environment, [S.L.], v. 85, n. 1, p. 1-20, abr. 2003. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00188-8
NASA. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Spectral Response of the Operational Land Imager In-Band, Band-Average Relative Spectral Response, 2021. Available online: https://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/preliminary-spectral-response-of-the-operational-land-imager-in-band-band-average-relative-spectral-response/
NGUYEN, C. T.; CHIDTHAISONG, A.; DIEM, P. K.; HUO, Lian-Zhi. A Modified Bare Soil Index to Identify Bare Land Features during Agricultural Fallow-Period in Southeast Asia Using Landsat 8. Land, [S.L.], v. 10, n. 3, p. 231, 25 fev. 2021. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/land10030231.
NOI, Phan Thanh; KAPPAS, Martin. Comparison of Random Forest, k-Nearest Neighbor, and Support Vector Machine Classifiers for Land Cover Classification Using Sentinel-2 Imagery. Sensors, [S.L.], v. 18, n. 2, p. 18, 22 dez. 2017. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18010018
NAIKOO, Mohd Waseem; RIHAN, Mohd; ISHTIAQUE, Mohammad; SHAHFAHAD. Analyses of land use land cover (LULC) change and built-up expansion in the suburb of a metropolitan city: spatio-temporal analysis of delhi ncr using landsat datasets. Journal of Urban Management, [S.L.], v. 9, n. 3, p. 347-359, set. 2020. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2020.05.004
PAL, M.; MATHER, P. M.. Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, [S.L.], v. 26, n. 5, p. 1007-1011, mar. 2005. Informa UK Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160512331314083.
PINTO, Cibele; PONZONI, Flávio; CASTRO, Ruy; LEIGH, Larry; MISHRA, Nischal; AARON, David; HELDER, Dennis. First in-Flight Radiometric Calibration of MUX and WFI on-Board CBERS-4. Remote Sensing, [S.L.], v. 8, n. 5, p. 405, 11 maio 2016. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs8050405
QU, Le’an; CHEN, Zhenjie; LI, Manchun; ZHI, Junjun; WANG, Huiming. Accuracy Improvements to Pixel-Based and Object-Based LULC Classification with Auxiliary Datasets from Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing, [S.L.], v. 13, n. 3, p. 453, 28 jan. 2021. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs13030453
RAMEZAN, Christopher A.; WARNER, Timothy A.; MAXWELL, Aaron E.; PRICE, Bradley S.. Effects of Training Set Size on Supervised Machine-Learning Land-Cover Classification of Large-Area High-Resolution Remotely Sensed Data. Remote Sensing, [S.L.], v. 13, n. 3, p. 368, 21 jan. 2021. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs13030368
SHAHABI, Himan; SHIRZADI, Ataollah; GHADERI, Kayvan; OMIDVAR, Ebrahim; AL-ANSARI, Nadhir; CLAGUE, John J.; GEERTSEMA, Marten; KHOSRAVI, Khabat; AMINI, Ata; BAHRAMI, Sepideh. Flood Detection and Susceptibility Mapping Using Sentinel-1 Remote Sensing Data and a Machine Learning Approach: hybrid intelligence of bagging ensemble based on k-nearest neighbor classifier. Remote Sensing, [S.L.], v. 12, n. 2, p. 266, 13 jan. 2020. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs12020266
SAMANIEGO, Luis; SCHULZ, Karsten. Supervised Classification of Agricultural Land Cover Using a Modified k-NN Technique (MNN) and Landsat Remote Sensing Imagery. Remote Sensing, [S.L.], v. 1, n. 4, p. 875-895, 9 nov. 2009. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs1040875
SILVA, Murilo Schramm da; VIBRANS, Alexander Christian; NICOLETTI, Adilson Luiz. BACKDATING OF INVARIANT PIXELS: comparison of algorithms for land use and land cover change (lucc) detection in the subtropical brazilian atlantic forest. Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas, [S.L.], v. 27, n. 3, p. 100-112, 2021. FapUNIFESP (SciELO). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1982-21702021000300018.
SILVA JUNIOR, Juarez Antonio da; PACHECO, Admilson da Penha; RUIZ-ARMENTEROS, Antonio Miguel; HENRIQUES, Renato Filipe Faria. Evaluation of the Ability of SLSTR (Sentinel-3B) and MODIS (Terra) Images to Detect Burned Areas Using Spatial-Temporal Attributes and SVM Classification. Forests, [S.L.], v. 14, n. 1, p. 32, 24 dez. 2022. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f14010032.
SILVA JUNIOR, Juarez Antonio da; PACHECO, Admilson da Penha. Análise do Modelo Linear de Mistura Espectral na Avaliação de Incêndios Florestais no Parque Nacional do Araguaia, Tocantins, Brasil: imagens eo-1/hyperion e landsat-7/etm+. Anuário do Instituto de Geociências, [S.L.], v. 43, n. 4, p. 340-450, 18 dez. 2020. Instituto de Geociencias - UFRJ. http://dx.doi.org/10.11137/2020_4_440_450
SILVA JÚNIOR, Juarez Antonio da; SILVA JÚNIOR, Ubiratan Joaquim da; PACHECO, Admilson da Penha. Análise de acurácia para o mapeamento de áreas queimadas utilizando uma cena VIIRS 1Km e classificação por Random Forest. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física, [S.L.], v. 14, n. 6, p. 3225, 31 dez. 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v14.6.p3225-3240
SHRESTHA, Megha; MITRA, Chandana; RAHMAN, Mahjabin; MARZEN, Luke. Mapping and Predicting Land Cover Changes of Small and Medium Size Cities in Alabama Using Machine Learning Techniques. Remote Sensing, [S.L.], v. 15, n. 1, p. 106-120, 25 dez. 2022.
VENTER, Zander S.; BARTON, David N.; CHAKRABORTY, Tirthankar; SIMENSEN, Trond; SINGH, Geethen. Global 10 m Land Use Land Cover Datasets: a comparison of dynamic world, world cover and esri land cover. Remote Sensing, [S.L.], v. 14, n. 16, p. 4101, 21 ago. 2022. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs14164101.
YUH, Yisa Ginath; TRACZ, Wiktor; MATTHEWS, H. Damon; TURNER, Sarah E.. Application of machine learning approaches for land cover monitoring in northern Cameroon. Ecological Informatics, [S.L.], v. 74, p. 101955, maio 2023. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101955
YAN, Jining; WANG, Lizhe; SONG, Weijing; CHEN, Yunliang; CHEN, Xiaodao; DENG, Ze. A time-series classification approach based on change detection for rapid land cover mapping. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, [S.L.], v. 158, p. 249-262, dez. 2019. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.10.003.
ZHAO, Ruifeng; CHEN, Yaning; SHI, Peiji; ZHANG, Lihua; PAN, Jinghu; ZHAO, Haili. Land use and land cover change and driving mechanism in the arid inland river basin: a case study of tarim river, xinjiang, china. Environmental Earth Sciences, [S.L.], v. 68, n. 2, p. 591-604, 21 jun. 2012. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1763-3.
WANG, Bing; JIA, Kun; LIANG, Shunlin; XIE, Xianhong; WEI, Xiangqin; ZHAO, Xiang; YAO, Yunjun; ZHANG, Xiaotong. Assessment of Sentinel-2 MSI Spectral Band Reflectances for Estimating Fractional Vegetation Cover. Remote Sensing, [S.L.], v. 10, n. 12, p. 1927, 30 nov. 2018. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs10121927.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.