LID Implementation in an urban basin: a Brazilian case study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X86491

Keywords:

Green roofs, PCSWMM, urban drainage

Abstract

Problems related to urban drainage systems and the disorderly growth of large urban centers have led to the search for alternative drainage techniques. These techniques have been called Low Impact Development (LID), and generally influence the reduction of peak flow and runoff volume. In an urban sub-basin in the city of Recife, PE, the hypothesis of replacing existing roofs with a green roof (GR) was considered in three scenarios: (1) pre-urbanized, (2) current, (3.1) 30% of GR, (3.2) 50% of GR, (3.3) 75% of GR, (3.4) 100% of T.V. For this, simulations were carried out in PCSWMM based on the current urbanization situation. Linimetric readings were taken for calibration, obtaining 0.61 NSE and 0.903 R². Validation was carried out using images at two points within the basin. The reduction in peak flow values ranged from 0.74 to 2.10 m³/s, in addition to the time being delayed from 31 to 90 minutes. As for river level values, the variation was between 4 and 13 cm, while volume reductions recorded values between 67.42 and 190.81 m³. Overall, this proposed methodology can help stormwater managers better evaluate the performance of LID techniques at different hydrological scales, showing the importance of prioritizing urban adaptation and green infrastructure implementation.

Downloads

Author Biographies

Camilla Pires dos Santos Câmara, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Doutoranda em Engenharia Civil, com ênfase em Recursos Hídricos, pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), mestre em Engenharia Civil pela Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE) e graduada em Engenharia Civil pela mesma Instituição de Ensino (UPE). Atua na área de Engenharia Civil com ênfase nos seguintes temas: Drenagem Urbana; Infraestrutura Urbana; Uso Racional da Água na Construção Civil.

Sylvana Melo dos Santos, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Possui graduação, mestrado e doutorado em Engenharia Civil pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), com um período de 2 anos de estudos (doutorado sanduíche) na Alemanha (Institut für Erdmessung - Universität Hannover). Atualmente é Professora Titular da UFPE, Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental. Membro permanente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil (PPGEC) da UFPE, do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil e Ambiental (PPGECAM) da UFPE e do Mestrado Profissional em Rede Nacional em Gestão e Regulação de Recursos Hídricos (ProfAgua). Coordenou o PPGECAM de 2010 a 2012 e o ProfÁgua (UFPE) de 2019 a 2021. Coordena/atua em projetos na área de Engenharia Civil, com ênfase em Hidrologia, principalmente nos seguintes temas: água subterrânea, subsidência do solo, tecnologias alternativas para o semiárido (cisternas) e técnicas compensatórios para drenagem urbana (telhados ecológicos).

Anderson Luiz Ribeiro de Paiva, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Possui graduação em Engenharia Civil pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (2002), mestrado em Engenharia Civil pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (2004) e doutorado em Engenharia Civil pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (2009). Atualmente é membro permanente da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, coordenador do curso de graduação da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, membro permanente da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, membro associado da Associação Águas do Nordeste e professor associado da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. 

Larissa Ferreira David Romão Batista, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Doutora em Engenharia Civil (UFPE) com ênfase em Recursos Hídricos, mestre em Engenharia Civil (UFPE) e bacharel em Arquitetura e Urbanismo (UFPE). Pesquisadora no tema de redução de risco de desastres (DRR) com foco em inundações. Tem experiência com tecnologias de modelagem hidrológica, hidrodinâmica, geoprocessamento e sensoriamento remoto. 

References

Alencar, A. V., Lafayette, F. B., Batista Filho, G., Silva, P. O., & Vasconcelos, R. F. A. (2016). Manual de Drenagem e Manejo das Águas Pluviais do Recife. Recife: Prefeitura da Cidade do Recife / Secretaria de Infraestrutura e Serviços Urbanos (SISUR) / Empresa de Manutenção e Limpeza Urbana (EMLURB).

Canholi, A. P. Drenagem urbana e controle de enchentes. São Paulo: Oficina de Textos, 2015

CEMADEN – Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alertas de Desastres Naturais. Dados do Pluviômetro automático de Areias, Recife-PE. http://www.cemaden.gov.br/mapainterativo.

CONDEPE/FIDEM – Agência Estadual de Planejamento e Pesquisa de Pernambuco (2023). Ortofotos do ano 1974 na escala 1:2000.

Dongquan, Z. C., Jining, W. Haozheng, T., Qingyuan, C., Shangbing, S., & Zheng (2009). GIS-Based Urban Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Using an Automatic Catchment-Discretization Approach: A Case Study in Macau. Environmental Earth Sciences 59(2):465-472, doi: 10.1007/s12665.009.0045-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0045-1

EMLURB – Empresa de Manutenção e Limpeza Urbana. Levantamento Topográfico de Seções Transversais do Canal da Malária. In: Estudos de Concepção para Gestão em Manejo de Águas Pluviais e Drenagem Urbana do Recife. [Pranchas 01 – 03] (2018).

EMLURB – Empresa de Manutenção e Limpeza Urbana. Mosaico de ortofotos da cidade do Recife no ano de 2013, 2020.

Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W. F., Ashley, R., Butler, D., Arthur, S., Trowsdale, S., Barraud, S., Semadeni-Davies, A., Bertrand-

Krajewski, J. L., Mikkelsen, P. S., Rivard, G., Uhl, M., Dagenais, D., & Viklander, M. (2015). SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water Journal, 12 (7), 525-542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314

Garnés, S. J. A. (2016). AstGeoTop. Módulo: Análise de maré.

Leite, B. P., Fujimura, J. M., & Fernandes, J. S. A. (2016). Avaliação dos impactos na drenagem com a implantação de telhados verdes na

UFMT – Campus Cuiabá utilizando o software SWMM. Anais do Simpósio de Geotecnologias no Pantanal 6, Cuiabá: Embrapa Informática Agropecuária/INPE, 354 – 363.

Marinha Do Brasil (2019). Tábua de Marés do Recife. https://www.marinha.mil.br/chm/sites/www.marinha.mil.br.chm/files/dados_de_mare/recife_2019.pdf.

Palla, A., Berretta, C., Lanza, L. G., & La Barbera,P. (2008). Modelling Storm Water Control Operated by Green Roofs at the Urban Catchment Scale University of Genoa – Italy, In: International Conference on Urban Drainage, 11., Edinburgh, 2008. Proceedings.., Edinburgh.

Peng, Z. & Stovin, V. (2017). Independent Validation of the SWMM Green Roof Module. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 22(9), 04017037-1 – 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001558

Pöe, S., Stovin, V., & Berretta, C. (2015). Parameters influencing the regeneration of a green roof’s retention capacity via evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology, 523, 356–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.002

Recife (2018a). Planejamento urbano: Perfil dos Bairros – RPA 6 – Imbiribeira. http://www2.recife.pe.gov.br/servico/imbiribeira?op=ODU=.

Recife (2018b). Planejamento urbano: Perfil dos Bairros – RPA 6 – Ipsep. http://www2.recife.pe.gov.br/servico/ipsep?op=ODU=.

Recife (2019). Análise de riscos e vulnerabilidades climáticas e estratégia de adaptação do município do Recife – PE: Resumo para tomadores de decisão. Recife. https://www2.recife.pe.gov.br/sites/default/files/sumario_clima_recife_portugues.pdf.

Rosa, D. J., Clausen, J. C., & Dietz, M. E. (2015). Calibration and Verification of SWMM for low impact development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA), 51(3), 746-757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12272

Schmitter, P., Goedbloed, A., Galelli, S., & Babovic, V. (2016). Effect of Catchment-Scale Green Roof Deployment on Stormwater Generation and Reuse in a Tropical City. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 142(7). doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.000.0643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000643

Silva Junior, M. A. B. (2017). Compensatory alternatives for flooding control in urban areas with tidal influence in Recife – PE. RBRH – Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos. 22(19). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.011.716040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.011716040

Silva, M. A. B.; Cabral, J. J. S. P. (2014). Atenuação de Picos de Vazão em Área Problema: Estudo Comparativo de Reservatórios de Detenção em Lote, em Logradouros e em Grande Área da Bacia. RBRH – Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos. 19 (2), 7–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21168/rbrh.v19n2.p7-18

Silva, P.O. (2019). Modelagem Hidrológica do Rio Tejipió por Ocasião de Chuvas Intensas levando em Conta o Efeito de Marés. 232p. [Tese de Doutorado em Engenharia Civil, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco – UFPE]. Repositório Institucional da UFPE.

https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/34501.

Stovin, V.; Vesuviano, G.; Kasmin, H. (2012). The hydrological performance of a green roof test bed under UK climatic conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 414–415, 148–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.022

Suresh, A.; Pekkat, S.; Subbiah, S. (2023). Quantifying the efficacy of Low Impact Developments (LIDs) for flood reduction in micro-urban watersheds incorporating climate change. Sustainable Cities and Society. 95, 104601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104601

Tucci, C. E. M. (2002). Gerenciamento da Drenagem Urbana. RBRH – Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos. 7(1),5–27. https://abrh.s3.sa-east-1.amazonaws.com/Sumarios/99/6137a1ef8fc1c04f81a9a6b46a3093dd_c80b83451c8ed0911a8b63bc1f8850cd.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.21168/rbrh.v7n1.p5-27

Downloads

Published

2024-08-09

How to Cite

Câmara, C. P. dos S., Santos, S. M. dos, Paiva, A. L. R. de, & Batista, L. F. D. R. (2024). LID Implementation in an urban basin: a Brazilian case study: . Ciência E Natura, 46, e86491. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X86491

Issue

Vol. 46 (2024): Publicação contínua

Section

Environment

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Ciência e Natura

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Most read articles by the same author(s)