Selection of models and parameter estimation for monitoring the COVID-19 epidemic in Brazil via Bayesian inference
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X73812Keywords:
Approximate Bayesian Computation, Epidemiological models, COVID-19Abstract
In 2019, a new strain of coronavirus led to an outbreak of disease cases named COVID-19, evolving rapidly into a pandemic. In Brazil, delayed decision making and lack of knowledge have resulted in an alarming increase in daily transmission and deaths. In this context, researchers used mathematical models to assist in determining the parameters that act in the spread of diseases, revealing containment measures. However, numerous mathematical models exist in the literature, each with specific parameters to be specified, leading to an important question about which model best represents the pandemic behavior. In this regard, this work aims to apply the Approximate Bayesian Computation method to select the best model and simultaneously estimate the parameters to resolve the abovementioned issue. The models adopted were susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR), susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered (SEIR), susceptible-infected-recovered-susceptible (SIRS), and susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered-susceptible (SEIRS). Approximate Bayesian Computation Monte Carlo Sequencing (ABC-SMC) was used to select among four competing models to represent the number of infected individuals and to estimate the model parameters based on three periods of Brazil COVID-19 data. A forecasting test was performed to test the ABC-SMC algorithm and the selected models for two months. The result was compared with the actual number of infected that were reported. Among the teste models, it was found that the ABC-SMC algorithm had a promising performance, since the data were noisy and the models could not predict all parameters.
Downloads
References
Apergis, N. (2022). COVID-19 and cryptocurrency volatility: Evidence from asymmetric
modelling. Financ Res Lett, V.47, P. 102- 659. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.
com/retrieve/pii/S1544612321005894. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Beaumont, M. A. (2010). Approximate bayesian computation in evolution and ecology. Annual
Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41(1), 379–406. Disponível em: https://doi.
org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144621. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Bekker, R.; uit het Broek, M.; Koole, G. (2023). Modeling COVID-19 hospital admissions and
occupancy in the Netherlands. Eur J Oper Res, 304(1), 207–218, Disponível em: https://
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221721011000.Acesso em: Julho de
Chan, Y. T. (2022). The macroeconomic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic: A SIR-DSGE model
approach. China Econ Rev, V.71, 101-725. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.
com/retrieve/pii/S1043951X21001437. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Chen, Z.; Feng, L.; Lay, H. A.; Furati, K.; Khaliq, A. (2022). SEIR model with unreported infected
population and dynamic parameters for the spread of COVID-19. Math Comput Simul,
Vol.198, P. 31–46, Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
S0378475422000787. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Cooper, I.; Mondal, A.; Antonopoulos, C. G. (2020). A SIR model assumption for the spread
of COVID-19 in different communities. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, V.139, P. 110-057.
Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0960077920304549.
Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Das, A.; Dhar, A.; Goyal, S.; Kundu, A.; Pandey, S. (2021). COVID-19: Analytic results for a
modified SEIR model and comparison of different intervention strategies. Chaos, Solitons
& Fractals, Vol.144, p. 110-595. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/
article/pii/S0960077920309863. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Deo, V.; Grover, G. (2021). A new extension of state-space SIR model to account for
Underreporting – An application to the COVID-19 transmission in California and Florida. Results Phys, Vol.24, p. 104-182. Disponível
em https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211379721003302. Acesso
em: Julho de 2023.
Dhar, M.; Bhattacharya, P. (2019). Analysis of SIR Epidemic Model with Different Basic
Reproduction Numbers and Validation with HIV and TSWV Data. Iran J Sci Technol Trans
A Sci, 43(5), 2385–2397. Disponível em: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40995-019-00701-9. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Franco, N. (2021). COVID-19 Belgium: Extended SEIR-QD model with nursing homes and longterm
scenarios-based forecasts. Epidemics, Vol.37, p. 100-490. Disponível em: https://
linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1755436521000414.
Kozyreff, G. (2021). Hospitalization dynamics during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave: SIR
modelling compared to Belgium, France, Italy, Switzerland and New York City data. Infect Dis Model, Vol.6, P. 398–404. Disponível
em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468042721000099. Acesso
em: Julho de 2023.
Liepe, J., Kirk, P., Filippi, S., Toni, T., Barnes, C. P., Stumpf, M. P. H. (2014). A framework for
parameter estimation and model selection from experimental data in systems biology
using approximate Bayesian computation. Nat Protoc, 9(2), 439–456. Disponível em:
http://www.nature.com/articles/nprot.2014.025. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Lima, J. P. d. O. (2021). Sistemas complexos aplicado a modelos epidemiológicos. Physicae
Organum - Revista dos Estudantes de Física da UnB, 7(1), 59–71. Disponível em: https://
periodicos.unb.br/index.php/physicae/article/view/36012 Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Liu, J.; Ong, G. P.; Pang, V. J. (2022). Modelling effectiveness of COVID-19 pandemic control
policies using an Area-based SEIR model with consideration of infection during interzonal travel. Transp Res Part A Policy
Pract, V.161, 25–47. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/
S0965856422001197. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
López, L.; Rodó, X. (2021). A modified SEIR model to predict the COVID-19 outbreak in Spain
and Italy: Simulating control scenarios and multi-scale epidemics. Results Phys, V.21, 103-
Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S2211379720321604.
Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Marinho, P. R. D.; Cordeiro, G. M.; Coelho, H. F.C.; Brandão, S. C. S. (2021). Covid-19 in Brazil:
A sad scenario. Cytokine Growth Factor Reviews, 58, 51–54. Disponível em: https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.10.010. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Marinov, T. T.; Marinova, R. S. (2022). Inverse problem for adaptive SIR model: Application
to COVID-19 in Latin America. Infect Dis Model, 7(1), 134–148. Disponível em: https://
linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468042721000828. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Martin, O. A., Kumar, R., Lao, J. (2021). Bayesian Modeling and Computation in Python. Chapman
and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
Minter, A.; Retkute, R. (2019). Approximate Bayesian computation for infectious disease
modelling. Epidemics, v. 29, 100-368. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
epidem.2019.100368. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Morando, N.; Sanfilippo, M.; Herrero, F.; Iturburu, M.; Torti, A.; Gutson, D.; Pando, M. A.;
Rabinovich, R. D. (2022). Evaluación de intervenciones durante la pandemia COVID-19:
desarrollo de un modelo basado en subpoblaciones con distintas tasas de contacto.
Revista Argentina de Microbiología, Vol. 54(2), p. 81–94. Disponível em: https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.ram.2021.04.004. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Morens, D. M., Fauci, A. S. (2020). Emerging Pandemic Diseases: How We Got to COVID-19.
Cell, 182(5), 1077–1092. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/
S0092867420310126. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Muñoz-Fernández, G. A., Seoane, J. M., Seoane-Sepúlveda, J. B. (2021). A SIR-type model
describing the successive waves of COVID-19. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, V.144, 110-682.
Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077921000357.
Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Ng, T. W.; Turinici, G., Danchin, A. (2003). A double epidemic model for the SARS propagation.
BMC Infectious Diseases, 3(1), Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-3-19.
Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Paul, A. K., Kuddus, M. A. (2022). Mathematical analysis of a COVID-19 model with double dose
vaccination in Bangladesh. Results Phys, v.35, 105-392. Disponível em: https://linkinghub.
elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2211379722001589. Acesos em:
Postnikov, E. B. (2020). Estimation of COVID-19 dynamics “on a back-of-envelope”: Does the
simplest SIR model provide quantitative parameters and predictions? Chaos, Solitons
& Fractals, v.135, p. 109-841. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/
article/pii/S0960077920302411. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Qiu, H., Wang, Q., Wu, Q., Zhou, H. (2022). Does flattening the curve make a difference? An
investigation of the COVID-19 pandemic based on an SIR model. Int Rev Econ Financ,
Vol. 80, p. 159–165. Disponível em https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
S1059056022000831. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Rao, V. S. H.; Upadhyay, R. K. (2013). Modeling the Spread and Outbreak Dynamics of Avian
Influenza (H5N1) Virus and Its Possible Control. Em: Dyn. Model. Infect. Dis., Springer
New York, New York, NY, pp. 227–250. Disponível em: http: //link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-9224-5{_}9. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Singh, A., Arquam, M. (2022). Epidemiological modeling for COVID-19 spread in India with the
effect of testing. Phys A Stat Mech its Appl, v.592, p. 126-774. Disponível em: https://
linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378437121009596. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Sunnåker, M., Busetto, A. G., Numminen, E., Corander, J., Foll, M., Dessimoz, C. (2013).
Approximate bayesian computation. PLoS Computational Biology, v.9(1), e1002,803.
Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002803. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Toni, T.; Welch, D.; Strelkowa, N.; Ipsen, A.; Stumpf, M. P. (2008). Approximate bayesian
computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical
systems. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, v.6 n°31, 187–202. Disponível em: https://
doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0172. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Ujvari, S. C. (2020). História Das Epidemias. Contexto.
Umar, M.; Sabir, Z.; Raja, M. A. Z.; Sánchez, Y. G. (2020). A stochastic numerical computing
heuristic of SIR nonlinear model based on dengue fever. Results Phys, v.19, 103-585.
Disponível em: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S2211379720320258.
Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Weinstein, S. J., Holland, M. S., Rogers, K. E., Barlow, N. S. (2020). Analytic solution of the
SEIR epidemic model via asymptotic approximant. Phys D Nonlinear Phenom, Vol.411,
p. 132-633. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
S016727892030453X. Acesso em: Julho de 2023.
Wintachai, P.; Prathom, K. (2021). Stability analysis of SEIR model related to efficiency of
vaccines for COVID-19 situation.
Heliyon, 7(4), e06,812. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06812. Acesso
em: Julho de 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.