Application of the bootstrap method in the optimization of beet betacyanin extraction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X71479Keywords:
Optimization, Bioactive compounds, Betacyanin, Resampling, BootstrapAbstract
The bootstrap method with resampling is a statistical tool that allows obtaining a greater confidence interval without the need for repetitions, as is the case with the RSM. The objective of this work was to apply this method in the extraction optimization of betacyanin from beet. Time and temperature were used in a second-order CCRD, and the response variable was the betacyanin content. The optimum extraction point was obtained by RSM, at 28min and 66°C. From the bootstrap analysis a reliable ellipse was constructed, and the maximum amounts were located at 20-35min and 60-65ºC, confirming the maximum extraction point. These results suggest that the bootstrap method is useful in evaluating the reliability of the optimization of betacyanin extraction from beet, predicted by RSM.
Downloads
References
ARAI, H. et al. Effect of an experimental design for evaluating the nonlinear optimal formulation of theophylline tablets using a bootstrap resampling technique. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, v. 57, n. 6, p. 572–579, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.57.572
ARAI, H. et al. Reliability Evaluation of the Design Space of the Granulation Process of Mefenamic Acid Tablets Using a Bootstrap Resampling Technique. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, v. 59, n. 5, p. 608–617, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.59.608
BAS, D.; BOYACI, I. H. Modeling and optimization i: Usability of response surface methodology. Journal of Food Engineering, v. 78, n. 3, p. 836–845, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024
CHEN, M.; ZHAO, Y.; YU, S. Optimization of ultrasonic-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds, antioxidants, and anthocyanins from sugar beet molasses. Food Chemistry, v. 172, p. 543–550, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.110
DAVISON, A. C.; HINKLEY, D. V. Bootstrap Methods and their Application. United States of America: Cambridge University Press 1997, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802843
DUANGJIT, S. et al. Bootstrap resampling technique to evaluate the reliability of the optimal liposome formulation: Skin permeability and stability response variables. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, v. 37, n. 9, p. 1543–1549, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b14-00361
DUQUÉ, B. et al. Quantification of Campylobacter jejuni contamination on chicken carcasses in France. Food Research International, n. August, p. 1–9, 2017.
EFRON, B. Second Thoughts on the Bootstrap. Statistical Science, v. 18, n. 2, p. 135–140, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1063994968
FILHO, A. S. DA S. Inferência em amostras pequenas: métodos bootstrap. Revista de Ciência Exata e Tecnologia, v. 5, n. 5, p. 115–126, 2010.
GIL-CHÁVEZ, G. J. et al. Technologies for Extraction and Production of Bioactive Compounds to be Used as Nutraceuticals and Food Ingredients: An Overview. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, v. 12, n. Harvey 2008, p. 5– 23, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12005
MARAN, J. P.; PRIYA, B. Multivariate statistical analysis and optimization of ultrasound- assisted extraction of natural pigments from waste red beet stalks. Journal of Food Science and Technology, v. 53, n. 1, p. 792–799, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1988-8
MATSUYAMA, T. An application of bootstrap method for analysis of particle size distribution. Advanced Powder Technology, v. 29, n. 6, p. 1404–1408, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2018.03.002
MISHRA, D. K.; DOLAN, K. D.; YANG, L. Bootstrap confidence intervals for the kinetic parameters of degradation of anthocyanins in grape pomace. Journal of Food Process Engineering, v. 34, n. 517, p. 1220–1233, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.2009.00425.x
MONTGOMERY, D. C. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 5. ed. [s.l.] John Wiley & Sons, 1976.
QUINTO, E. J. et al. Bootstrap parametric GB2 and bootstrap nonparametric distributions for studying shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains growth rate variability. Food Research International, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.11.045
RSTUDIO. RStudio: Integrated Development for R.Bostom, MA, 2021. Disponível em:
SILVA, C. M. et al. Controle estatístico de qualidade usando o método bootstrap. Scientia Pllena, v. 14, n. 3, p. 1–9, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14808/sci.plena.2018.037001
SIVAKUMAR, V. et al. Ultrasound assisted enhancement in natural dye extraction from beetroot for industrial applications and natural dyeing of leather. Ultrasonics - Sonochemistry, v. 16, n. 6, p. 782–789, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.03.009
STINTZING, F. C. et al. Color, betalain pattern, and antioxidant properties of cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) clones. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, v. 53, n. 2, p. 442– 451, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf048751y
SWAMY, G. J.; SANGAMITHRA, A.; CHANDRASEKAR, V. Response surface modeling and process optimization of aqueous extraction of natural pigments from Beta vulgaris using Box-Behnken design of experiments. Dyes and Pigments, v. 111, p. 64–74, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.05.028
WERKEMA, M. C. C.; AGUIAR, S. Otimização estatística de processos: como determinar a condição de operação de um processo que leva ao alcance de uma meta de melhoria. [s.l.] Editora QFCO, 1996.
YUAN, Y. et al. Anthocyanins from buds of Lonicera japonica Thunb. var. chinensis (Wats.) Bak. FRIN, v. 62, p. 812–818, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.026
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ciência e Natura

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.