Estimation and regionalization of minimum reference streamflows in the Branco River basin, Roraima, Brazil, as a support for water resources management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X65901Keywords:
Use granting, Water availability, Water seasonality, Minimum reference streamflowsAbstract
The effective application of water use granting requires knowing the water supply in the basin to allow the management body to match the demands of different users with water availability. Thus, determining the minimum reference streamflows and their regionalization is essential for defining the grantable limits. This study aimed to estimate and regionalize the minimum reference streamflows Q7,10, Q95, and Q90, with an annual and semiannual frequency, for the Branco River basin, Roraima, Brazil. The following procedures stood out among those carried out: the survey of historical series of existing streamflow data for the basin within the scope of the National Hydrometeorological Network; definition of the hydrological year and seasonal periods; estimation and regionalization of the minimum reference streamflows with an annual and semiannual frequency; and assessment of the impact of seasonality on granting the concession for water resources management in the Branco River basin. The minimum reference streamflows were estimated for thirteen streamflow gauge stations and two homogeneous regions were defined. Significant increases in the minimum reference streamflows were observed when considering the rainy period compared to the annual period. The adoption of the annual streamflow permanence Q95 and Q90 at the Caracaraí streamflow gauge station on the Branco River replacing Q7,10 allowed an increase of 75.1% and 123.3%, respectively, in the streamflow that can be granted. The analysis of results showed that the flexibility of the granting criteria in adopting the seasonality in the water availability allows considerable increases in the grantable streamflow of the Branco River basin in the flood semester.
Downloads
References
ALVES, M. B. Regionalização de vazões mínimas de referência e média de longa duração da bacia hidrográfica Tocantisn-Araguaia. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Agrícola) – Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG: UFV, 2022. 148 f.
COSTA, J. V. M.; TYBUSCH, J. S. Uma abordagem crítica sobre a outorga dos direitos de uso dos recursos hídricos no Brasil. In: SEMANA ACADÊMICA FADISMA ENTREMENTES. ISSN: 2446-726X, Ed. 12. Santa Maria – RS. Anais... 2015.
ELETROBRAS - Centrais Elétricas Brasileiras S.A. Metodologia para regionalização de vazões. Rio de Janeiro, 1985.
EMPRESA DE PESQUISA ENERGÉTICA (EPE). Bacia Hidrográfica do rio Branco: Estudos de Inventário Hidrelétrico Relatório Final: AAI – Avaliação Ambiental Integrada. Brasília, DF: EPE, 2011. Vol. 1/2, 289p.
FEMARH - Fundação Estadual de Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos. Relatório PROGESTÃO 2015 – 2º. Período de Certificação. OFICIO n. 0277/2016/GAB/FEMARH. Relatório PROGESTÃO 2015. Roraima, 28 de marco de 2016.
FIOREZE, A. P.; OLIVEIRA, L. C. Usos dos recursos hídricos da bacia hidrográfica do Ribeirão Santa Bárbara, Goiás. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, v. 40, n. 1, janeiro-março, 2010.
LISBOA, L.; SANTOS, A. L. M. R.; ULIANA, E. M.; OLIVEIRA, B. L. F.; ANDRADE, N. M.; ALVES, L. G. S.; GARCIA, D. O.; SILVA, M. R. Modelo Digital de Elevação Hidrograficamente Condicionado (MDEHC) e Caracterização Morfométrica da Bacia do rio Branco - RR. In: XXI Simpósio Brasileiro de Recursos Hídricos. 2015. Brasília. Anais...ABRH, 2015.
LISBOA, L.; CORRÊDO, L. P.; MOREIRA, M. C.; SILVA, D. D.; ULIANA, E. M. Estimativa e regionalização das vazões mínimas anuais e quadrimestrais na bacia do Piracicaba-MG. Enciclopédia BIOSFERA, Centro Cientifico Conhecer – Goiânia, v. 10, n. 18, 2014.
LOPES, T. R.; ZOLIN, C. A.; PRADO, G. do.; ALMEIDA, F. T. DE. Regionalization of maximum and minimum flow in the Teles Pires Basin, Brazil. Engenharia Agrícola, v.37, n.1, p. 54-63, jan. 2017.
MARQUES, F. A. Sistema de Controle Dinâmico para a Gestão dos Usos Múltiplos da Água. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Agrícola) – Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG: UFV, 2010. 234 p.
MARQUES, F. A.; SILVA, D. D.; RAMOS, M. M.; PRUSKI, F. F. AQUORA - Sistema multi-usuário para gestão de recursos hídricos. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, v. 14, n. 4, p. 51-69, 2009.
MOREIRA, M. C.; SILVA, D. D. Análise de Métodos para estimativa das vazões da bacia do rio Paraopeba. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, v. 19, n.2, abril/junho, 2014.
MOREIRA, M. C. Gestão de recursos hídricos: sistema integrado para otimização da outorga de uso da água. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Agrícola) – Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG: UFV, 2006. 105 p.
NOVAES, L. F.; PRUSKI, F. F.; QUEIROZ, D. O.; RODRIGUEZ, R. G.; SILVA, D. D.; RAMOS, M. M. Avaliação de desempenho de cinco metodologias de regionalização de vazões. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, Porto Alegre, v.12, n.2, p. 51–61, 2007.
SILVA, B. M. B.; SILVA, D. D.; MOREIRA, M. C. Influência da sazonalidade das vazões nos critérios de outorga de uso da água: estudo de caso da bacia do rio Paraopeba. Revista Ambiente & Água, Taubaté-SP, vol. 10, n. 3, Julho/setembro de 2015. doi: 10.4136/ambi-agua.1587.
SILVA, D. D.; MARQUES, F. A.; LEMOS, A.F. Flexibilidade Das Vazões Mínimas De Referência Com A Adoção Do Período Trimestral. Revista Engenharia na Agricultura, v. 19, nº. 3, mai/jun., 2011, p. 244 – 254.
SILVA, A. M.; OLIVEIRA, P. M.; MELLO, C. R. DE; PIERANGELI, C. Vazões mínimas e de referência para outorga na região Alto do Rio Grande, Minas Gerais. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, Campina Grande, v.10, n. 2, p. 374–380, 2006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.