Meteorological influences on solar energy production in a coastal Amazon region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X41269Keywords:
Climate change, Energetic risk, Climatic riskAbstract
A study was conducted with a photovoltaic distributed generation system in São Luís, Brazil, to determine the influence of meteorological variables on the generation of energy. The methodology is composed of three stages: the first corresponds to the obtaining, organization, and treatment of the data; the second involves the application of mathematical models to determine the yield, operating temperature, nominal power, and estimated power; and the third is to generate the correlations obtained between the monitored climatic variables, whether on an hourly, daily, monthly, or annual scale. For an average temperature of 27.50ºC in March, it was verified that the ultraviolet radiation was 5.06, while the average of the total radiation was 481.01 W.m-2. The maximum peak temperature was 27.88°C at noon, while the ultraviolet radiation was 8.55 and total radiation was 794.97 W.m-2. At this average temperature variation of 0.38°C, there is a variation of 313.96 W.m-2. It is concluded that, because São Luís is very close to the equator, the conditions to produce the system are favorable, mainly because, on average, there were no abrupt changes in temperature and radiation for the period studied. Even in the wintry period, the production behaved within the parameters designed.
Downloads
References
ANGONESE, A. R.; Campos, A. T.; ZACARKIM, C. Eb.; MATSUO, M. S.; CUNHA, F. Energy efficiency of pig productiobbbbn system with waste treatment in biodigestor. Brazilian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, v.10, n.3, p.745-750, 2006.
ARVIZU, D. et al. Direct Solar Energy. In IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2011.
BEZERRA JÚNIOR, J. T; BEZERRA JÚNIOR, J. T. The market of distribution of electric energy in Maranhão: a study on environmental proactivity, 2013.
BRAUN, P.; SANTOS, I. P.; ZOMER, C. D.; RÜTHER, R. The integration of solar photovoltaic systems at six Brazilian airports using different solar cell technologies. Brazilian Journal of Solar Energy. v.1, n.1, p.12-22, 2010.
DUBEY, S.; SARVAIYA, J. N.; SESHADRI, B. Temperature dependent photovoltaic (PV) efficiency and its effect on PV production in the world - A review. Energy Procedia, v. 33, p. 311–321, 2013.
EVANS, D. L. Simplified method for predicting photovoltaic array output. Solar Energy, v. 27, pp. 555-560, Jul. 1981.
EVANS, D. L.; FLORSCHUETZ, L. W. Cost studies on terrestrial photovoltaic power systems with sunlight concentration. Solar Energy, v. 19, n. 3, p. 255-262, 1977.
FEDRIZZI, M. C.; SAUER, I.L. Photovoltaic solar pumping, historical, features and projects. University of Sao Paulo. Program Interunidades of Post-Graduation in Energy, 2002.
FERREIRA, T. D. V. G.; OLIVEIRA, L. H. D. Individual decentralized non-potable water system: the need for quality and quantity management. AmbienteConstruído, v. 18, n. 1, p. 379-392, 2018.
GARG, H.P., AGARWAL, R.K. “Some aspects of a PV/T collector/forced circulation flat plate solar water heater with solar cells”. Energy Conversion and Management, v. 36, p. 87–99, Out. 1994.
GRIFFITH, J. S.; RATHOD, N. S.; PASLASKI, J. Some tests of flat plate photovoltaic module cell temperatures in simulated field conditions. Proc. 15th IEEE PhotovoltaicSpecialists Conf. Kissimmee, EUA, p. 822-30, 1981.
GUERRA, Hélvio Neves. I Workshop OSTSEV: Operação de Sistemas Fotovoltaicos em Condições Ambientais e Climáticas. 2017.
GUERRA, S.M.G.; FANTINELLI, J.T. The approach between technology and economy: the emerging roles of energy. Journal of Social Studies. Year 3, n. 5, p.33-58, 2001.
HAMAKAWA, S.; HIBINO, T.; IWAHARA, H. Electrochemical Hydrogen Permeation in a Proton‐Hole Mixed Conductor and Its Application to a Membrane Reactor. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, v. 141, n. 7, p. 1720-1725, 1994.
HART, G. W.; RAGHURAMAN, P. Simulation of thermal aspects of residential photovoltaic systems. MIT Report DOE/ET/20279-202, 1982.
HEGEDUS, S. Review of photovoltaic module energy yield (kWh/kW): Comparison of crystalline Si and thin film technologies. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, v. 2, n. 2, p. 218–233, 2013.
HERNÁNDEZ-Moro, J.; MARTÍNEZ-Duart, J. M. Analytical model for solar PV and CSP electricity costs: Present LCOE values and their future evolution. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 20, p. 119-132, 2013.
LAVRATTI, Paula Cerski; PRESTES, VanescaBuzelato. Diagnosis of the legislation: identification of the norms with incidence in mitigation and adaptation to the climatic changes. Institute the right for a green planet, 2010.
MARTINS, V. S.; NOVO, E. M. L. M.; LYAPUSTIN, A.; ARAGÃO, L. E. O. C.; FREITAS, S. R.; BARBOSA, C. C. F. Seasonal and interannual assessment of cloud cover and atmospheric constituents across the Amazon (2000–2015): Insights for remote sensing and climate analysis. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, v. 145, p. 309–327, 2018.
RAZIKOV, T.M; FEREKIDES, C.S.; MOREL, D.; STEFANAKOS, E.; HULLAL, H.S.; UPADHYAYA, H.M. Solar photovoltaic electricity: Current status and future prospects. Solar Energy, v. 85, p. 1580-1608, 2011.
SALLA, D. A.; FURLANETO, F.P.B.; CABELLO, C.; KANTHACK, R.A.D. Energy analysis of cassava ethanol production systems (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Brazilian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, v.14, n. 4, p. 444-448, 2010.
SANO, E. E.; FERREIRA, L. G.; ASNER, G. P.; STEINKE, E. T. Spatial and temporal probabilities of obtaining cloud‐free Landsat images over the Brazilian tropical savanna. International Journal of Remote Sensing, v. 28, n. 12, 2739–2752, 2007.
SCHULER, M.; GREEN, D. R. Mechanisms of p53-dependent apoptosis, 2001.
SILVA, F. B.; SANTOS, J. R. N.; FEITOSA, F. E. C. S.; SILVA, I. D. C.; ARAÚJO, M. D.; GUTERRES, C. E.; NERES, R. L. Evidências de mudanças climáticas na região de transição Amazônia-Cerrado no estado do Maranhão. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, v. 31, n. 3, p. 330-336, 2016.
SINGH, P.; RAVINDRA, N.M., Temperaturedependenceof solar cell performance ananalysis. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, v. 101, p. 36–45, 2012.
SKOPLAKI, E.; BOUDOUVIS, A.G.; PALYVOS, J.A. A simple correlation for the operating temperature of photovoltaic modules of arbitrary mounting. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, v. 92, p. 1393– 1402, Mai. 2008.
SKOPLAKI, E.; PALYVOS, J.A. On the temperature dependence of photovoltaic module electrical performance: A review of efficiency/power correlations. Solar Energy, v. 83, n. 5, p. 614–624, Mai. 2009.
SKOPLAKI, E.; PALYVOS, J.A. Operating temperature of photovoltaic modules: A survey of pertinent correlations. Renewable Energy, v. 34, p. 23–29, Jun. 2008.
SOUSA, T.A.; PREGITZER R.L.; MARTINS, J.S.; AFONSO, J.L. Study of the Panorama of Renewable Energy in the European Union and Suggestions for Portugal. Conference on RenewableEnergiesandEnvironment in Portugal Figueira da Foz, Portugal, p. 1.87-1.92. 201. 2015.
TOLMASQUIM, Mauricio T.; GORINI, Ricardo. Brazilian energy matrix: a prospective. New studies. - CEBRAP, São Paulo, n. 79, p. 47-69, Nov. 2007.
TRIGOSO, F.M.; QUAGLIA, R. B.; MORAES, A. M.; OLIVEIRA, S.H.F. Panorama of distributed generation in Brazil based on the use of Photovoltaic Solar technology. Revista Brasileira de Energia Solar, v. 1, n. 2, p. 127-138, 2010.
VEISSID, Nelson; BARUEL, Mário Ferreira. Solar Energy and its Application in Satellites. São José dos Campos: SindCT, 2012. Available at www.sindct.org.br/files/celulassolares.pdf. Accessed 05/02/2018.
VON ROEDERN, B.; KENNETH, Zweibel; HARIN, S. Ullal. The role of polycrystalline thin-film PV technologies for achieving midterm market-competitive PV modules. Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2005. Conference Record of the Thirty-first IEEE. IEEE, 2005.
ZOLPER, J. C.; NARAYANAN, S.; WENHAM, S. R.; GREEN, M. A. 16.7% efficient, laser textured, buried contact polycrystalline silicon solar cell. AppliedPhysicsLetters, v. 55, n. 22, p. 2363-2365, 1989.
Published
Versions
- 2022-06-21 (2)
- 2020-12-31 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
