Correlation between water salinity and arterial hypertension
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X34442Keywords:
Hypertension. Water. Salinity.Abstract
Hypertension is the main risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases. The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between cases of hypertension and environmental aspects related to water salinity in the municipality of Arari-Maranhão. The following data were evaluated: 1) secondary data on cases of hypertension reported from 2002 to 2012 registered in the Hiperdia Program of the Department of Informatics of SUS (DATASUS), in the municipality of Arari-Maranhão; 2) a temporal series of climatic data and river water quality measured by the physicochemical parameters and the water flow of the Mearim River; and 3) the statistical correlation between the indicators of water quality and the cases of hypertension of the study sample. The results revealed a seasonality in cases of hypertension in the municipality of Arari. This variation was inversely related to the precipitation and the salinity of the river water. Thus, decreased precipitation resulted in increase driver salinity and, consequently, increased consumption of salt by the population, increasing the number of cases of hypertension. The correlation between cases of hypertension and precipitation or salinity was significant and negative. These results revealed a significant correlation between cases of hypertension, water quality, and climatic factors.
Downloads
References
ALI AA; ADAM GK; ABDALLAH TM. Seasonal variation and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in eastern Sudan. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015; 35(2):153-4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2014.948815. PMid: 25141293.
BAARS H, ANSMANN A, ALTHAUSEN D, ENGELMANN R, HEESE B, MÜLLER D. Aerosol profiling with lidar in the Amazon Basin during the wet and dry season. Geophys Res Atmospheres, 2012; 117(D21):1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018338.
BROOKS, YR. Melhoria da Atenção à Saúde dos Usuários com Hipertensão e/ou Diabetes na Unidade de Saúde do Caic, José de Freitas-PI / Yaima Ribeaux Brooks; Fabiana Vargas Ferreira, orientador (a). 70 f.: il. – Pelotas: UFPI, 2016.
BUSCHMANN J, BERG M, STENGEL C. Contamination of drinking water resources in the Mekong delta floodplains: arsenic and other trace metals pose serious health risks to population. Environ Int, 2008; 34(6): 756–64.
FILHO, E. B. B; PONTES, J. R. S. A inserção da vigilância em saúde ambiental no sistema único de saúde do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Promoção da Saúde (Impr); v. 25, n. 1 (2012).
FLEENOR, W; HANAK, E; LUND, J; MOUNT, J. Delta Hydrodynamics and Water Salinity with Future Conditions – Technical Appendix C. Public Policy Institute of California; 2008.
FRANCHINI M, MANNUCCI PM. Air pollution and cardiovascular diseases. Thromb Res. 2012; 129(3): 230-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2011.10.030.
HANARI, M., et al. (1999), Ecologia da Saúde: Saúde, Cultura e Interação Homem/Ambiente, Londres, Routledge.
HOQUE MA, SCHEELBEEK PFD, VINEIS P.. Drinking water vulnerability to climate change and alternatives for adaptation in coastal South and South East Asia. Clim Change, 2016; 136(2):247–63.
IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Censo Demográfico 2010. Disponível em: https://censo2010. Ibge. gov. br/sinopse/index.php?Uf=21 Acesso em 05 de junho de 2018.
IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa nacional de Saúde: percepção do estado de saúde, estilos de vida e doenças crônicas-Brasil, grandes regiões e unidades da federação Brasília (DF), 2013; Disponível em: http://ftp.Ibge.gov.br/PNS/2013/pns2013.pdf Acesso em 05 de junho de 2018.
IPCC, 2007: Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report.
Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K and Reisinger, A. (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 104 pp.
JUNIOR, C. S; SASSON, S. Biologia-Genética, evolução e ecologia. Volume 3.3 serie. 7 edição. São Paulo. Saraiva. 2010.
KHAN, A. E; IRESON, A; KOVATS, S; MOJUMBER, S. K; KHUSRU, A; RAHMAN, A; VINEIS, P. Drinking Water Salinity and Maternal Health in Coastal Bangladesh: Implications of Climate Change. Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Apr 12.
KOLIAKI C; KATSILAMBROS N. Dietary sodium, potassium, and alcohol: key players in the pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment of human hypertension. Nutr Rev, 2013; 71(6):402–11.
MAKHSEED M; MUSINI VM; AHMED MA; MONEM RA. Influence of seasonal variation on pregnancy-induced hypertension and/or preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;39(2):196-9. DOI: http://dx.doi. Org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.1999. tb03372.x. PMid:10755779.
MELO B; AMORIM M; KATZ L; COUTINHO I; FIGUEIRA JN. Hypertension, pregnancy and weather: is seasonality involved? Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2014; 60(2): 105-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.Org/10.1590/1806-9282.60.02.006. PMid:24918996.
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST B. Coastal Land Zoning in the Southwest: Report on ‘‘Impact of Sea Level Rise on Land use Suitability and Adaptation Options’’. April, 2006.
MORIKAWA M; YAMADA T; CHO K; SATO S; MINAKAMI H. Seasonal variation in the prevalence of pregnancy-induced hypertension in Japanese women. Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014; 40 (4):926-31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.12304. PMid:24612433.
OPAS. Dia Mundial da Hipertensão. Organização Panamericana de Saúde, 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.paho.org/bireme/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=330:dia-mundial-da-hipertensao-2016&Itemid=183&lang=pt> Acesso em 10 de junho de 2018.
PUTTI, L. D. Estudo e percepção das etapas de tratamento de água no município de Jaú. 138 folhas. Monografia (Especialização em Ensino de Ciências). Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Medianeira, 2011ª.
TEIXEIRA, J.C; GUILHERMINO, R. L. Análise da associação entre o saneamento e saúde nos estados brasileiros, empregando dados secundários do banco de dados indicadores e dados básicos para a saúde 2003-IDB 2003. Rev. Eng. Sanit. Ambient. Vol. 11. No. 3. Rio de janeiro, jul-set, 2006.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). A Global Brief on Hypertension: Silent Killer, Global Public Health Crisis [Online]. 2013. Disponível em: http://www. thehealthwell.info/node/466541 (August 2016, date last accessed). Acesso em 30 de junho de 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.