Vegetative propagation of na endemic species of the Pampa biome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X39235Keywords:
cutting, Hesperozygis ringens, rootingAbstract
The definition of vegetative propagation methodologies is an alternative for the preservation of endangered native species with potential for economic exploitation, as Hesperozygis ringens. Thus, this study aims to verify the possibility of propagating this species through cutting, testing different substrates and types of cuttings, and comparing the propagation through cuttings obtained from atock plants in a greenhouse and directly in the field. Apical and non-apical cuttings, 6.0cm long, obtained from material from the field and greenhouse, were propagated in trays containing carbonized rice husk and a mixture of carbonized rice husk with coconut fiber powder (2:1, v/v) as substrates. Completely randomized blocks were used in a 2x2 factorial design, with four replicates of 10 cuttings. The plantlets production of H. ringens by cutting is feasible, since it presents a high rooting percentage even when propagules are collected in plants of populations in situ. However, when collected from plants in a greenhouse, the root system of plantlets presents a higher quality than that obtained in field, making possible the production and establishment of plantlets in greenhouses.Downloads
References
BIANCHINI AE, CUNHA JA, BRUSQUE ICM, PINHEIRO CG, SCHINDLER B, HEINZMANN BM, et al. Relaxing effect of eugenol and essential oils in Pomacea canaliculata. Ciência Rural. 2017;47:1-6.
CASTILHO CVV, FANTATTO RR, GAÍNZA YA, BIZZO HR, BARBI NS, LEITÃO SG, et al. In vitro activity of the essential oil from Hesperozygis myrtoides on Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus and Haemonchus contortus. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia. 2017;27:70-76.
CHAGAS JH, PINTO JEBP, BERTOLUCCI SKV, NALON FH. Produção de mudas de hortelã-japonesa em função da idade e de diferentes tipos de estaca. Ciência Rural. 2008;38:2157-2163.
DOMINGOS A, ANTUNES S, BORGES L, ROSÁRIO VE. Approaches towards tick and tick-borne diseases control. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical. 2013;46:265-269.
EMER AA, SCHAFER G, AVRELLA ED, DELAZERI M, VEIT PA, FIOR CS. Influence of indolebutyric acid in the rooting of Campomanesia aurea semihardwood cuttings. Ornamental Horticulture. 2016;22:94-100.
FACHINELLO JC, HOFFMANN A, NACHTIGAL JC. Propagação de plantas frutíferas. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; 2005.
HARTMANN HT, KESTER DE, DAVIS JR FT, GENEVE RL. Plant propagation: principles and practices. New Jersey: Englewood Clipps; 2011.
KÄMPF NA. Produção comercial de plantas ornamentais. Guaíba: Agrolivros; 2005.
MATTANA RS, FRANCO VF, YAMAKI HO, MAIA E ALMEIDA CI, MING LC. Propagação vegetativa de plantas de pariparoba (Pothomorphe umbellata (L.) Miq.) em diferentes substratos e número de nós das estacas. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais. 2009;11:325-329.
OLIVEIRA JS, PEIXOTO CP, POELKING VGC, ALMEIDA AT. Avaliação de extratos das espécies Helianthus annuus, Brachiaria brizantha e Sorghum bicolor com potencial alelopático para uso como herbicida natural. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais. 2015;17:379-384.
OLIVEIRA LM, NEPOMUCENO CF, FREITAS NP, PEREIRA DMS, SILVA GC, LUCCHESE AM. Propagação vegetativa de Hyptis leucocephala Mart. ex Benth. e Hyptis platanifolia Mart. ex Benth. (Lamiaceae). Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais. 2011;13:73-78.
PACHECO JP, FRANCO ETH. Substratos e estacas com e sem folhas no enraizamento de Luehea divaricata Mart. Ciência Rural. 2008;38:1900-1906.
PES LZ, ARENHARDT MH. Fisiologia vegetal. Santa Maria: Colégio Politécnico da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria; 2015.
RIBEIRO VLS, SANTOS LC, BORDIGNON AS, APEL MA, HENRIQUES AT, VON POSER GL. Acaricidal properties of the essential oil from Hesperozygis ringens (Lamiaceae) on the cattle tick Riphicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Bioresource Technology. 2010;101:2506-2509.
RIO GRANDE DO SUL [Internet] Lista da Flora Ameaçada de Extinção do Rio Grande do Sul. 2014. Available from: http://www.fzb.rs.gov.br/conteudo/4809/?Homologada_a_nova_Lista_da_Flora_Ga%C3%BAcha_Amea%C3%A7ada_de_Extin%C3%A7%C3%A3o.
SASSO SAZ, CITADIN I, DANNER MA. Propagação de jabuticabeira por estaquia. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura. 2010;32:577-583.
SILVA LL, SILVA DT, GARLET QI, CUNHA MA, MALLMANN CA, BALDISSEROTTO B, et al. Anesthetic activity of Brazilian native plants in silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen). Neotropical Ichthyology. 2013;11:443-451.
TONI C, BECKER AG, SIMÕES LN, PINHEIRO CG, DE LIMA SILVA L, HEINZMANN BM, et al. Fish anesthesia: effects of the essential oils of Hesperozygis ringens and Lippia alba on the biochemistry and physiology of silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen). Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 2014;40:701-714.
VLADIMIR-KNEŽEVIĆ S, BLAŽEKOVIĆ B, KINDL M, VLADIĆ J, LOWER-NEDZA AD, BRANTNER AH. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory, antioxidant and phytochemical properties of selected medicinal plants of the Lamiaceae Family. Molecules. 2014;19:767-782.
VON POSER GL, MENUT C, TOFFOLI ME, VÉRIN P. Essential oil composition and allelopathic effect of the Brazilian Lamiaceae Hesperozygis ringens (Benth.) Eplig and Hesperozygis rhododon Eplig. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1996;44:1829-1832.
XAVIER A, WENDLING I, DA SILVA RL. Silvicultura clonal: princípios e técnicas. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa; 2009.
ZORZETO TQ, DECHEN SCF, ABREU MF, FERNANDES JÚNIOR F. Caracterização física de substratos para plantas. Bragantia. 2014;73:300-311.
Published
Versions
- 2022-04-26 (2)
- 2020-06-29 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.