New food models for populations meal facing to food safety : an overview on international scientific production

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X35980

Keywords:

17 objectives of sustainable development, Food and nutrition security, Sustainable production chain, Public policy, FAO

Abstract

Food systems and agricultural production techniques face complex challenges, as set out in the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (ODS), for example, in addressing the food and nutritional security of the entire human population, a concern of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), when it proposes the necessary changes in agricultural systems, rural economies and the way natural resources are managed. All this action aims to reach a world free of hunger, malnutrition and quality of life. In this context, this research presents a systematic review of the bibliography dealing with food safety, facing to collect the main discussions about the new food models of the populations. It is a purely bibliographical research, descriptive and qualitative approach. For the treatment of the data collected, Star software was used. The keywords described in the sweep of the systematic review were: "food safety" AND "new food model" AND "food industry" in the Sciency Direct database. Due to the method of collection employed, 13 international articles were obtained, which discussed new food models of the populations in favor of food security. They are considered original texts and provide new fields of research and advances in eating practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Paula da Silva Santos, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS

Doutoranda em Administração pelo do Programa de Pós- Graduação em Administração da Escola de Administração e Negócios - PPGAD da ESAN/UFMS.

Thelma Lucchese Cheung, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS

Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de São Carlos e pela Universidade de Nantes na França (fevereiro 2007 conclusão do doutorado). 

Marcia Maria dos Santos Bortolocci Espejo, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS

Docente Permanente dos Programas de Pós-graduação em Ciências Contábeis [Mestrado] e Administração (Mestrado e Doutorado) e dos cursos de graduação em Administração e Ciências Contábeis da Escola de Administração e Negócios - ESAN da UFMS. 

References

ABREU, Simioni Edeli de et al. Alimentação mundial - uma reflexão sobre a história. Saúde e sociedade. v 10(2):3-14, 2001.

ACSELRAD, Henri. Conflitos ambientais no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará: Fundação Heinrich Böll, 2004.

ABREU, Simioni Edeli de et al. O que é Justiça Ambiental. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond, 2009.

ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO E PESQUISA EM ADMINISTRAÇÃO (ANPAD). Boas Práticas da Publicação Científica: um manual para autores, revisores, editores e integrantes de Corpos Editoriais. Disponível em: < https://www.mackenzie.br/fileadmin/ARQUIVOS/Public/top/midias_noticias/editora/old/Editora/Revista_Administracao/Boas_Praticas.pdf>. Acesso em: jun. 2018.

BARDIN, Lawrence. Análise do conteúdo. 3. ed. Edições 70, Lda, Lisboa, 2004.

CASTELLO BRANCO, Telma (Org.). Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional no Nordeste do Brasil: Algumas experiências. Rio de Janeiro: Edições Loyola, 2005. (Coleção CERIS, Ano 2, n. 2, 2005).

COPE - Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. Code of Conduct, (2011). Disponível em: <https://publicationethics.org/files/u7141/1999pdf13.pdf>. Acessado em: mar. 2018.

KIM, Kawon Kathy et al. Identifying baseline food safety training practices for retail delis using the Delphi expert consensus method. Food control, v. 32, n. 1, p. 55-62, 2013.

KOTSANOPOULOS, Konstantinos V.; ARVANITOYANNIS, Ioannis S. The Role of Auditing, Food Safety, and Food Quality Standards in the Food Industry: A Review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, v. 16, n. 5, p. 760-775, 2017.

MACHEKA, Lesley et al. Barriers, benefits and motivation factors for the implementation of food safety management system in the food sector in Harare Province, Zimbabwe. Food control, v. 34, n. 1, p. 126-131, 2013.

MALUF, Renato S. Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional. 2. ed. Petrópolis-RJ; Vozes, 2009.

MANZINI, Riccardo; ACCORSI, Riccardo. The new conceptual framework for food supply chain assessment. Journal of food engineering, v. 115, n. 2, p. 251-263, 2013.

MORGAN, O. Ashton et al. A split-sample revealed and stated preference demand model to examine homogenous subgroup consumer behavior responses to information and food safety technology treatments. Environmental and Resource Economics, v. 54, n. 4, p. 593-611, 2013.

NOCELLA, Giuseppe; ROMANO, Donato; STEFANI, Gianluca. Consumers’ attitudes, trust and willingness to pay for food information. International journal of consumer studies, v. 38, n. 2, p. 153-165, 2014.

PAMFILIE, Rodica et al. Innovative Food Quality Models–Developed as an Interface for Modern Consumers and Sustainable Business. Amfiteatru Economic Journal, v. 18, n. 43, p. 663-674, 2016.

BAUR, Patrick; GETZ, Christy; SOWERWINE, Jennifer. Contradictions, consequences and the human toll of food safety culture. Agriculture and Human Values, v. 34, n. 3, p. 713-728, 2017.

POULIOT, Sebastien. The Production of Safe Food According to Firm Size and Regulatory Exemption: Application to FSMA. Agribusiness, v. 30, n. 4, p. 493-512, 2014.

RICHARDSON, Roberto Jarry. Pesquisa social: métodos e técnicas. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007.

SHUKLA, Seema; SHANKAR, Ravi; SINGH, S. P. Food safety regulatory model in India. Food Control, v. 37, p. 401-413, 2014.

SILVA, Eduardo Robini da et al. Caracterização das pesquisas de teses em administração com abordagem qualitativa. Revista de Administração de Roraima-UFRR, Boa Vista, v. 6, n. 1, p. 194-223, jan./jun., 2016.

SOON, Jan Mei; SAGUY, I. Sam. Crowdsourcing: A new conceptual view for food safety and quality. Trends in food science & technology, v. 66, p. 63-72, 2017.

START, Software. State of the art through systematic review. Disponível em< http://lapes.dc.ufscar.br/tools/start_tool>. Acessado em: jan, 2018.

TAYLOR, Joanne et al. An industry perspective: a new model of food safety culture excellence and the impact of audit on food safety standards. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, v. 7, n. 1, p. 78-89, 2015.

WILSON, Annabelle et al. Trust makers, breakers and brokers: building trust in the Australian food system. BMC Public Health, v. 13, n. 1, p. 229, 2013.

WILSON, Annabelle M. et al. A model for (re) building consumer trust in the food system. Health promotion international, v. 32, n. 6, p. 988-1000, 2016.

SAMPAIO. R. F; MANCINI. M.C. Estudos de Revisão Sistemática: Um Guia Para Síntese Criteriosa da Evidência Científica. Rev. bras. fisioter., São Carlos, v. 11, n. 1, p. 83-89, jan./fev. 2007. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbfis/v11n1/12.pdf .Acessado em: 02/nov/2018.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-16

How to Cite

Santos, P. da S., Cheung, T. L., & Espejo, M. M. dos S. B. (2019). New food models for populations meal facing to food safety : an overview on international scientific production. Ciência E Natura, 41, e3. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X35980

Issue

CIÊNCIA E NATURA, V. 41, 2019

Section

Geography

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.