Wind forecast employing the WRF model for a wind potential analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X35526Keywords:
WRF, Wind feld, Wind energyAbstract
The WRF (Weather Research and Forecast) is a numerical modeling applied to the atmosphere. This model was developed for weather forecasting and investigation of atmospheric mesoscale phenomena. The WRF is a public domain and free distribution, with different applications ranging from the field of meteorology to engineering, and can be applied in situations of idealized atmosphere or real atmosphere. Presently, the wind field simulated by this model has been used as real data. Thus, the WRF model started to be employed in wind analysis for wind power generation. In this work, the wind field was simulated using the WRF model, in Cachoeira do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Downloads
References
CARVALHO, DJS. Optimização do modelo numérico de previsão do tempo WRF no contexto de previsão e produção de energia eólica, em Aveiro/Portugal[dissertation]. Aveiro: Universidade de Aveiro; 2009. 53p.
DA SILVA RAMOS DN, LYRA DF,DA SILVA JÚNIOR RF, SALUSTIANO R. Previsão do vento utilizando o modelo atmosférico WRF para o estado de Alagoas. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia. 2013; 28(2): 163-172.
DA SILVA SMS, LYRA RFF, Junior RSS, da Cruz NSD, Silva SS. Avaliação do Desempenho do Modelo WRF para Prognóstico do vento na Região Central de Alagoas – Craíbas.Ciência e Natura. 2018; 40:187-192.
DUDHIA J. NumericalstudyofconvectionobservedduringtheWinterMonsoonExperimentusing a mesoscaletwo – dimensionalmodel. JournaloftheAtmosphericSciences. 1989;46:3077-3107.
KAIN, J.S.TheKain – Fritschconvectiveparameterization: AnUpdate. J. Appl. Meteorol. 2004; 43(1):170-181.
MLAWER, EJ. et al. Radiativetransfer for inhomogeneousatmospheres: RRTM, a validatedcorrelated‐kmodel for thelongwave. JournalofGeophysicalResearch: Atmospheres. 1997; 102: 16663-16682.
NIU GY, YANG ZL, MITCHELL KE, CHEN F,EK MB, BARLAGE M et al. ThecommunityNoahandsurfassemodelwithmultiparameterizationoptions (Noah-MP): 1.Modeldescriptionandevaluationwithlocal-scalemeasurements. JournalofGeophysicalResearch. 2011;116:1-19.
OLIVERA, AFS. Avaliação do Modelo WRF na Previsibilidade do Vento para Geração de Energia Eólica na Região de Laguna-SC [monography]. Florianópolis: Departamento de Física/UFSC; 2017.
Oliveira SS, SOUZA EP. Análise de Modelos de Mesoescala para Caracterização do Potencial Eólico do Estado da Paraíba. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia. 2017; 32(2):77-291.
SANSIGOLO, CA. Distribuições de probabilidade de velocidade e potência do vento. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia. 2005; 20(2): 207-214.
SUKORIANSKY, S.; GALPERIN, B.; STAROSELSKY, I. A quasi normal scaleeliminationmodelofturbulentflowswithstablestratification.
Phys. Fluids, 2005:17, 1-28.
TUCHTENHAGEN P,BASSO J, YAMASAKI Y. Avaliação do potencial eólico no Brasil em 2011. Ciência e Natura. 2014; 36(2): 390-401.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
