Visitation of Buddleja brasiliensis (Buddlejaceae) by bees and hummingbirds in an upland hygrophilous forest of São Paulo State
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X26770Abstract
The pollination of Buddleja brasiliensis in the Atlantic rainforest is carried out by small hummingbirds. This study intended to verify if these birds are also the main visitors at this plant species in an upland forest of São Paulo State. Observations on floral visitors were done at the Reserva de Santa Genebra, Campinas, between 6:00am and 6:00pm (24 hours total). The hummingbirds Chlorostilbon aureoventris and Thalurania glaucopis visited the inflorescences, but the most frequent visitants were Apidae and Anthophoridae bees. These results indicate that the flowers of B. brasiliensis, although being visited by small hummingbirds, are utilized mainly by bees in hygrophilous forests.Downloads
References
BAWA, K. S. Plant-pollinator interactions in tropical rain forests. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 21: 399-422. 1990.
GREENEWALT, C. H. Humminqbirds. New York: Dover Publications, Inc. 1990.
GRANTSAU, R. Os beija-flores do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Expressão e Cultura. 1988.
SNOW, D. W. & SNOW, B. K. Relationships between hummingbirds and flowers in the Andes of Colombia. BulI. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.), 38: 105-139. 1980.
SNOW, D. W. & SNOW, B. K. Feeding ecology of hummingbirds in the Serra do Mar, southeastern Brazil. EI Hornero, .12.: 286-296. 1986.
SNOW, D. W. & TEIXEIRA, D. L. Hummingbirds and their flowers in the coastal mountains of southeastern Brazil. J. Ornit., 123: 446-450. 1982.
SAZIMA, M. Hummingbird pollination of Barbacenia flava (Velloziaceae) in the Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Flora, 168: 239-247. 1977.
SAZIMA, M. & MACHADO, I. C. S. Biologia floral de Mutisia coccinea St. Hil. (Asteraceae). Rev. Bras. Bot., §: 103-108. 1983.
SAZIMA, M. & SAZIMA, I. Hummingbird pollination in two species of Vellozia (Liliiflorae: Velloziaceae) in southeastern Brazil. Bot. Acta, 103: 83-86. 1990.
SAZIMA, I.; BUZATO, S. & SAZIMA, M. The saw-billed hermit Ramphodon naevius and its flowers in southeastern Brazil. J. Ornith., 136: 195-206. 1995.
ARAUJO, A. C. Beija-flores e seus recursos florais numa área de planície costeira do litoral norte de São Paulo. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade Estadual de Campinas. 1996.
FEISINGER, P. Coevolution and pollination. In: D. S. Futuyma & M. Slatkin (eds.) Coevolution. Sinauer Press, Sunderland, pp. 282-310.1983.
FRISCH, J. D. & FRISCH, C. A. D. O jardim dos beija-flores. São Paulo: Dalgas-Ecoltec Ecologia Técnica. 1995.
FEINSINGER, P. & CHAPLlN, R. K. On the relationship between wing disc loading and foraging strategy in hummingbirds. Am. Nat., 108: 217-224. 1975.
ARIZMENDI, M. DEL C. & ORNELAS, J. F. Hummingbirds and their floral resources in a tropical dry forest in Mexico. Biotropica, 22: 172-180. 1990.
FIGUEIREDO, R. A. de & ALVARES, S. Freqüência de visitas e comportamento alimentar do beija-flor Phaetornis pretrei nas flores de uma Cactaceae. Bioikos, Z: 28-33. 1993.
WOLF, L. L., STILES, F. G. & HAINSWORTH, F. R. Ecological organization of a tropical highland hummingbird community. J. Anim. Ecol., 32: 349-379. 1976.
BUZATO, S. Estudo comparativo de flores polinizadas por beija-flores em três comunidades de Mata Atlântica no sudeste do Brasil. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade Estadual de Campinas. 1995.
SAZIMA, I.; BUZATO, S & SAZIMA, M. An assemblage of hummingbird pollinated flowers in a montane forest in southeastern Brazil. Bot. Acta, 109: 149-160. 1996.
JOLY, A. B. (1991) Botânica: introdução à taxonomia vegetal. São Paulo: Ed. Nacional. 10a. ed., p.592. 1991.
LORENZI, H. & SOUZA, H. M. Plantas ornamentais no Brasil. Nova Odessa: Ed. Plantarum. 1995.
MORELLATO, L. P. C. & LEITÃO-FILHO, H. F. Ecologia e preservação de uma floresta tropical urbana: Reserva de Santa Genebra. Campinas: Ed. Unicamp. 1995.
DAFNI, A. Pollination ecology: a pratical approach. Oxford: IRL Press. p. 166-174. 1992.
SAZIMA, M. & SAZIMA, I. Os beija-flores e suas flores. ln.: L. P. C. Morellato & H. F. Leitão-Filho (eds.). Ecologia e preservação de uma floresta tropical urbana: Reserva de Santa Genebra. Campinas: Ed. Unicamp. p.60-63. 1995.
MITCHELL, M. H. Observations on birds of southeastern Brazil. Canada: University of Toronto Press. 1957.
ALEIXO, A. Aves da Mata de Santa Genebra: lições para a conservação de fragmentos florestais. ln.: L. P. C. Morellato & H. F. Leitão-Filho (eds.). Ecologia e preservação de uma floresta tropical urbana: Reserva de Santa Genebra. Campinas: Ed. Unicamp, p.83-86. 1995.
MARINI, M. A. Menos matas, menos pássaros. Ciência Hoje, 20: 16-17. 1996.
WILLlS, E. O. & ONIKI, Y. Levantamento preliminar de aves em treze áreas do estado de São Paulo. Rev. Bras. Biol., 41: 121-135. 1981.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.