Levantamento das plantas medicinais utilizadas em bairros de Santa Maria – RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X26612Abstract
A survey done in the districts of Santa Maria, RS, revealed that people make continuous use of medicinal plants. This study was based on interviews made with the residents of seven districts of the city: Nossa Senhora de Lourdes, Medianeira, Nossa Senhora das Dores, Centro, Nossa Senhora do Rosário, ltararé and Patronato. A total of 148 species were registered, belonging to 134 genus and arranged in 64 families. Lists are shown containing the species mentioned in the questionaries, along with the popular name, family, therapeutic indication and pharrnacogeno.Downloads
References
MARTINS, E.R. et ali L Plantas medicinais. Viçosa: Imprensa Universitária, 1995. 220 p.
MATOS, F.J.A. Plantas medicinais: guia de seleção e emprego de plantas medicinais do Nordeste do Brasil. Fortaleza: IOCE, v.1, 1989. 164 p.
SIMÕES, C.M.O. et all. Plantas da medicina popular do Rio Grande do Sul. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Editora da Universidade/UFRGS, 1989. 174 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
