FLORISTIC LIST OF ARBOREAL AND SHRUBBY COMPONENTS OF THE CAMPUS OF FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA MARIA, SANTA MARIA, RS
Keywords:florística, angiospermas, arborização urbana
This study aimed to contribute to the knowledge of the species of trees and shrubs occurring on the campus of the Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS. The survey was conducted through collections of fertile material, seasonal in urban campus, in the period between 2011 and 2012. We found 131 species belonging to 50 families, with family Fabaceae with greater richness. The species with the largest occurrence were Handroanthus heptaphyllus (Vell.) Mattos (Bignoniaceae) and Peltophorum dubium (Spreng.) Taub. (Fabaceae). There was a predominance of exotic species, represented by 61, 6%, followed by the native, 38, 4%, which shows a change of the local flora.
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 161: 105-121, 2009.
CAVALCANTI, M.L.F. et al. Identificação dos vegetais destinados à ornamentação de praças, parques e creches em Campina Grande, PB. Revista de Biologia e Ciências da Terra, 2004. Disponível em: . Acesso em 13 março de 2013.
CHAMAS, C.C.; MATTHES, L.A.F. Método para levantamento de espécies nativas com potencial ornamental. Revista Brasileira de Horticultura Ornamental, v. 6, p. 53-63, 2000.
EISENLOHR, P.V. et al. Flora fanerogâmica do campus da Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais. Ceres. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 55 (4): 317-326, 2008.
FIGUEIRAS, T.S. et al. Caminhamento – um método expedito para levantamentos florísticos qualitativos. Caderno de Geociências, 12: 39-43, 1994.
FORTES, A.B. Geografia física do Rio Grande do Sul. Ed. Globo, Porto Alegre. 1959.
GODOI, S. et al. Levantamento florístico das espécies arbóreas e arbustivas da Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba - Campus Taquaral. 5ª Mostra Acadêmica UNIMEP, 2007. Disponível em: http://www.camara-sm.rs.gov.br/index.php?conteudo=noticia&id=39. Acesso em 16 de março de 2013.
KURIHARA, D.L.; ENCINAS, J.I.; PAULA, J.L. Levantamento da arborização do campus da universidade de Brasília. Cerne. Lavras: Universidade Federal de Lavras, 11(2): 127-136, 2005.
LORENZI, H.; SOUZA, H.M. Plantas ornamentais no Brasil. 3ª Ed. Nova Odessa: Instituto Plantarum, 1088 p., il., 2001.
MILANO, M.S. Arborização urbana. Apostila. Curitiba: UFPR, 1995.
MOBOT. Missouri Botanical Garden, W3 Specimens Data Base. 2008. Disponível em: http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/W3T/Search/vas.html. Acesso em 09 de novembro de 2012.
MORENO, A. Clima do Rio Grande do Sul. Secretaria da Agricultura, Divisão de Terras e Colonização, Porto Alegre. 1961.
VALENTINI, D.R. Planejamento ambiental para o campus da UFSM - Santa Maria - RS. In: Anais do XVI ENANPUR [Internet]; 2015 Maio 18-22; Belo Horizonte, Brasil. Disponível em: http://xvienanpur.com.br/anais/?wpfb_dl=402.
How to Cite
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.