Effect of Urotensin I on the ionic content of the plasma and the Gallbladder bile of Hoplias malabaricus (Bloch, 1974) (Teleostei, Characiformes, Erythrinidae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X26605Abstract
In this study the urotensin I (UI) effect on the ionic content of the plasma and the gallbladder bile (GB) of Hoplias malabaricus, a freshwater teleost, was investigated, and action of this hormone on the water trasnport in the gallbladder was analyzed. Fishes were captured in ponds situated on the campus of the Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Southern Brazil. Blood was collected by puncture of caudal artery and GB was drained by the cystic duct. The intraperitoneal injection of UI (500 ng/kg) in H. malabaricus increased the Na+ levels in the plasma and in the GB in relation to the saline-injected group. However, no change was observed in the levels of K+, Ca++ and Mg++ in the plasma and in the GB when UI was injected. The gallbladder of H. malabaricus has a mucosa-serosa water flow. On incubation of the serosa of the gallbladder sacs with UI (10-8M) there was a significant increase in water flow. Due to the fact that UI alters the GB Na+ levels and the water flow in the gallbladder, it is possible that UI can be involved in the regulation of the bile composition on fishes.
Downloads
References
Baldisserotto, B.; Mimura, O.M.; Farias, A.P.T.; Christensen, F. Effect of luminal pH on gastric motility "in vitro" of Hoplias malabaricus (TELEOSTEI). BoI. Fisiol. Anim. S. Paulo, v.14, p.13-17, 1990a.
Baldisserotto, B.; Mimura, O.M. and Salomão, L.C. Gallbladder bile and plasma ionic content of some freshwater teleosts. BoI. Fisiol. Anim. S. Paulo, v.14, p.7-11,1990b.
Baldisserotto, B.; Mimura, O.M. and Salomão, L.C. Effect of pH on ion and water transport in the gut of the freshwater teleost, Synbranchus mannoratus. Ciência e Cultura, v.45, p.396-398, 1993.
Baldisserotto, B.; Mimura, O.M. and Salomão, L.C. Urophyseal control of plasma ionic concentration in tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus exposed to osmotic stress. Ciência e Natura, v.16, p. 39-50, 1994.
Bern, H.A. The elusive urophysis - Twenty-five years in pursuit of caudal neurohormones. Amer. Zool., v.25, p.763-769, 1985.
Bern H.A. and Nishioka, R.S. The caudal neurosecretory system and osmoregulation. Gunma Svmp. Endocrinol., v.16, p.9-17, 1979.
Fryer, J.N.; Woo, N.Y.S.; Gunther, R.L. and Bern, HA Effect of urophysial homogenates on plasma ion levels in Gillichthys mirabilis (Teleostei, Gobiidae). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol., v.35, p.238-244, 1978.
Lederis, K.; Fryer, J.; Rivier, J.; MacCannell, K.L.; Kobayashi, Y.; Woo, N. and Wong, K.L. Neurohormones from fish tails. 11. Actions of urotensin I in mammals and fishes. Recent Progress in Hormone Research, v.41, p.553-576,1985.
Mimura, O. M. Effects of urophyseal and terminal spinal cord homogenates on the plasma chloride level in Rhamdia sebae, a fresh water fish. BoI. Fisiol. Anim. S. Paulo, v.12, p.31-38, 1988.
Mimura, O. M. and Baldisserotto, B. Plasma ionic and osmotic concentrations of two freshwater teleost, Prochilodus aflinis and Prochilodus marggravii in different gonadal stages. BoI. Fisiol. Anim. S. Paulo, v.12, 21-30, 1988.
Mimura, O. M. and Baldisserotto, B. Water and ions isotonic transport on gall bladder in Synbranchus marrnoratus (TELEOSTEI): 1n vitro effects of urophysial homogenates. Abstract Xlth Intemational Symposium on Comparative Endocrinology, Malaga, Spain, 1989.
Woo, N.Y.S.; Tong, W.C.M. and Chan, E.L.P. Effects of urophysial extracts on plasma electrolyte and metabolite levels in Ophiocephalus maculatus. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol., v.41, p.458-466, 1980.
Woo, N.Y.S. and Tong, W.C.M. Urophyseal control of glucose metabolism and osmoregulation in the snakehead, Ophiocephalus maculatus. In: Neurosecretion: molecules, cells, systems. D.S. Farner and K. Lederis, eds., 512-513. Plenum Press, New York, 1981.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.