Cianofíceas de solo e calçamento no Campus da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil

Authors

  • Marlene Pilecco Bertagnolli Departamento de Biologia, Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas - CCNE Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM, Santa Maria, RS.
  • João Fernando Prado Departamento de Biologia, Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas - CCNE Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM, Santa Maria, RS.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X26496

Keywords:

Cianofíceas terrestres, cianofíceas de solo e sistemática.

Abstract

The work consists in a taxonomic survey and classification of genera of blue green algae from soil and paving, which were found in eight samplis and conducted in five stations in the Campus or Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. Twenty two genera were obtained and distributed in five families and three orders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AZEVEDO, M.T.P. Edaphic blue-green algas fron the São Paulo Botanical Garden, Brazil. Stuttgart: Algological Studies 64, 503-526. 1991

BERTAGNOLLI, M. P. Levantamento de Gêneros de cianofíceas de solo e calçamento no Campus da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Santa Maria. Monografia de Epecialização. 1994 58 p.

BICUDO, C.E.M., BICUDO, R.M T. Algas de águas continentais brasileiras, chave ilustrada para identificação de gêneros. São Paulo: EDUSP, 1970 228 p.

BOURRELLY, P Les algues d' eau douce, Initiation à Ia Sistematique. Les algues bleues et rouges Paris, N Boubèe, v 3, 1970 512 p.

COMPÈRE, P. Algues De La Région Du Lac Tchad. II Cyanophycées, Cah. O. R. S. T. O M. Sér. Hydrobiol., VoI VIII n 314,165-199,1974.

DANIN, A., BAR - OR, Y., DOR I. e YBRAELI, T. The role of Cyanobacteria m stabilization of sand dunes in souther Israel. Ecolmediterr 15 (1/2): 15 - 64, 1989.

DAVEY, M., DAVISON H.P.B, RlCHARD K. J. e WYNN - WILLlAMS D. D. Attachment and growth of ntartic soil cyanobacteria and algae on natural and artificial substrato. Inglaterra: Soil Biol Biochem 23 (2): 185 - 192, 1991.

FRANCESCHINI, I. M. Levantamento das Nostocophyceae do Rio Seco, Torres, Rio Grande Sul, Brasil. Tese (Mestrado em Ciências Biológicas) Instituto de Biociências UFRGS Porto Alegre: 1983. 157 p.

HOFFMANN, L. Cyanophycées aériennes et subaériennes du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. Bull. Jard. Bot.. Nat. Belg: Bull Natt, Plantentuin Belg. 56 (112) 77-127, 30-6, 1986.

KOSTYKOV, I. Algae of rarines and their autierosion role. Ukr. Bot. Zh 47 (1): 43 - 47, 1990.

LYRA, E. Algas no solo do agreste de Pernambuco. U F. de Pernambuco: Publicação n. 693: 1-8, 1972.

OLIVEIRA, M. S. B., OLIVEIRA, N. A., DAINESI, M. B., CARDOSO, E. J. B. N. Ocorrência de Algas Cianoficeas em dois solos do Município de Piracicaba. São Paulo: O solo, 72, 62-64, 1980.

ORTEGA - CALLO J. J., HERNANDEZ - MARINE M., SAIZ - JIMENEZ C. Biodeterioration of building materiaIs by Cyanobacteria and algae. Espanha: Int Biodeterior 28 (1 - 4): 165 - 186, 1991.

PEREIRA, R. B., GARCIA NETO, L. R, BORIN, C. J. A., BARROS SARTORI, M. G. Contribuição à Geografia Física do Município de Santa Maria: Unidades de Paisagem. Santa Maria: Geografia - Ensino & Pesquisa, 3: 37 - 68, Dez 1989. 175 p.

PHUNG, T. N. H., COUTÉ, A., BOURRELL Y, P. Les Cyanophycées du delta du Mékong (Viet-Nan). Stuttgart: Nova Hedwigia 54, 3- 4, 403-446. 1992.

ROUND, F. E. Biologia das Algas. 2 ed. Rio de janeiro: Guanabara Dois, 1983. 263 p.

SANT'ANNA, C. L. Flora de Cyanophyceae associada a Briófita, Município de Campina Verde, M. G. Rickia 11: 129-142, 1984.

SENNA, P. A. C. Nostocoficeas do Município de São Paulo, Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. São Paulo: 1982. 249 p. Dissertação de mestrado.

SHI - MEl, L., SHANG - HOO, L. Interaction of two populations of the blue-green algae in coculture. China: Acta Bot Sin 33 (2): 110-117, 1991.

TRACANNA, B. C. Algas deI Noroeste Argentino Excluyendo Ias Diatomophyceae). San Miguel De Tucumán: Opera Lilloano 35, 1985. 136 p.

WERNER, V. R. Cianoficeas planctônicas da Lagoa de Tramandaí e da Lagoa do Armazém, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia, Sér. Bot., Porto Alegre (37): 33-70, 1988.

Downloads

Published

1994-12-12

How to Cite

Bertagnolli, M. P., & Prado, J. F. (1994). Cianofíceas de solo e calçamento no Campus da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Ciência E Natura, 16(16), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X26496

Issue

CIÊNCIA E NATURA, V. 16, N. 16, 1994

Section

Articles

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.