Genus crenicichla of Central Region of RS: Crenicichla lepidota Heckel, 1840
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X25555Abstract
Eighty three specimens of fish known as "joanas", belonging to the Zoological Collection of the Biology Department, University of Santa Maria, originating from the Ibicui River and the Dam of the Pisciculture Sector of the same Institution were studied and identified as Crenicichla lepidota Heckel, 1840 and theyr meristic and morphometric data compared with the data available in the literature.
Downloads
References
BERTOLETTI, J.J. 1986. Principais peixes capturados no Rio Grande do Sul. Veritas, Porto Alegre, 31(122):273-80.
BOSSEMEYER, I.M.K.; WEIS; M.L.C.; BENNEMANN, S.T. & BIER, M.L.S.1985. Ictiofauna do Rio Santa Maria, RS. Ciência e Natura, Santa Maria, 7:209-22.
BRITSKII, H.A.; SATO, Y. & ROSA, A.B.S. Manual de identificação de peixes da região de Três Marias. Brasilia, CODEVASF, 1984. 143p.
FOWLER, H.W.•Os peixes de água doce no Brasil. Arq. de Zoologia do Est. de São Paulo, São Paulo, IX: 1-400, 1954.
GROSSER, K.M. & HAHN, S.D. 1981. Ictiofauna da Lagoa Negra, Parque Estadual de Itapuã, Município de Viamão, Rio Grande do sul, Brasil. Iheringia, Porto Alegre 59:45-64.
HASEMAN, J.D. 1911. An annotated catalog of the Cichlid fishes collected by the expedition of the Carnegie Museum to Central South America, 1907-10. Ann. Carnegie Mus., Pittsburg, 7(3-4): 329-73.
HECKEL, J. 1840. Johann Natterer's neue Flussfische Brasiliens nach den Beobachtungen und Mittheilungen des Entdeckers beschrieben. Annin. Wien. Mus. Natges, 2: 327-470.
KULLANDER, S.O. 1982. Cichlid from the La Plata basin. Part III. The Crenicichla lepidota species group (Teleostei, Cichlidae). Revue Suisse Zool., Genêve,89(3):627-61.
REGAN, C. T. 1905. A revison of the fishes of the South American cichlid genera Crenacara, Batrachops and Crenicichla. Proc. Zool Soc., London, 1: 152- 68.
_________. 1913. A synopsis of the cichlid fishes of the genus Crenicichla, Ann. e Mag. Nat. Hist., London, 8(11):489-504.
RINGUELET, R.A.; ARAMBURU, R.H. & ARAMBURU, A.A. Los peces argetinos de agua dulce. La Plata, Librart., 1967. 602 p .
von IHERING, H. 1907. Os peixes de água doce do Brazil. 1ª parte: Gymnoti e Cichlidae. Revta.Mus.Paulo, São Paulo, 7:258-338.
WALLWITZ, J.C.G. 1976. A famllia Cichlidae em Pelotas (RS) com chave para identificação das espécies. Bolo do IPEMAFLA, Pelotas, 2: 3-21.
WEIS, M.L.C.; BOSSEMEYER, I.M.K.; BIER, M.L.S. & LIPPOLD, H.O. 1983. Inventário da fauna ictiológica do Rio Ibicui-Mirim, RS. Ciência e Natura, Santa Maria, 5:135-152.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
