lchthyologia fauna of the Santa Maria River, RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X25424Abstract
The ichthyologic fauna of the Santa Maria River was studied through seasonal collections from august 1984 to may 1985. Considerations were made about the systematics, ocurrence and abundance of the collected species. A total of 1345 fishes pertaining to thirty nine genera and fifty three species were examined and identified.
Downloads
References
BENNEMANN, S.T. & BOSSEMEYER, I.MK. Aspectos da sistemática de Schizodon nasutus e Schizodon platae. Revista Centro de Ciências Rurais, Santa Maria, 15 (3):271-289, 1985.
BRITSKI, H. Peixes de água doce no Estado de São Paulo - Sistemática. In: COMISSÃO INTERESTADUAL DA BACIA PARANÁ - URUGUAI. Poluição e Piscicultura. São Paulo, Faculdade de Saúde Pública da USP e Inst. de Pesca, CPRN, S.A., 1970, 79-108 p.
DEVINCENZI, C.J. & TEAGUE, G.W. Ictiofauna del Rio Uruguay Médio. Anales del Museo de Hist.Nat., Montevidéo, 5 (4):1-109, 1942.
EIGENMANN, C.H.•& EIGENHANN, R.S. Preliminary notes on South America Nematognathi. Proc.California Acad. Sci., (1):119-79, 1888.
EIGENMANN, C.H. & BRAY, N.L. A revision of the american Cichlidae. Anals N.Y.Acad.Sci., VII:607-24, 1894.
FORTES, A.B. Geografia Física do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, Globo, 1959, 393 p.
FOWLER, H.N. Os peixes de água doce do Brasil. Arq. de Zoologia do Est. De São Paulo, São Paulo, VI:1-204, 1948.
__________. Os peixes de água doce do Brasil. Arq. de Zoologia do Est. de São Paulo, São Paulo, VI:205-404, 1950.
__________. Os peixes de água doce do Brasil. Arq. de Zoologia do Est. de São Paulo, São Paulo, VI: 405-628, 1951.
__________. Os peixes de água doce do Brasil. Arq. de Zoologia do Est. de são Paulo, São Paulo, IX:l-400, 1954.
GARAVELLO, J.C. Revisão taxonômica do genero Leporinus Spix, 1829. São Paulo, 415 p. Departamento Zoologia da USP. (Tese de Doutorado, 1979.
GÉRY, J. Characvids of the Word, USA, TFH Publications. Inc. Ltd., 1977. 632p.
GOSLINE, W.A. Contribuitions to the classification of the Loricariid catfishes. Ar.Mus.Nac., Rio de Janeiro, 41:79-134,1947.
GUEDES, D. de S. Contribuição ao estudo da sistemática e alimentação de jundiás (Rhamdia spp) na região central do Rio Grande do Sul (Pisces, Pimelodidae). Santa Maria, 95p. Dissertação (Mestr. Zootecnia). Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 1980.
MENEZES, N.A. Systematics and evolution of the tribe Acestrorhyncinii (Pisces, Characidae). Arq. de Zoologia, São Paulo, 18(1-2) : 1-150,1969.
MENEZES, N. A. On the Cynopotamine, a new subfamily of Characidae (Osteichthyes, Ostariophysi, Characoidei). Arq. de Zoologia, São Paulo, 28(2):1-91, 1976.
RIBEIRO, A. de M. "Fauna Brasiliense" - Peixes (Eleutherobranchios-Aspirophoros) - Physoclisti. Arq.Mus.Nac., Rio de Janeiro, 17:1-827, 1915.
RINGUELET, R.A.; ARAMBURU, R.H. & ARAMBURU, A.A. Los peces argentinos de agua dulce. La Plata, Librart, 1967, 602 p.
WEIS, M.L.C.; BOSSEMEYER, I.M.K.; BIER, M.L.S. & LIPPOLD, H.O. Inventário da fauna ictiológica do Rio Ibicuí-Mirim, RS.Ciência e Natura, Santa Maria, 5:135-152, 1983.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
