USING GEOGEBRA FOR TEACHING REVOLUTION SOLIDS

Authors

  • Lucas Rodrigues Pereira Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri.
  • Mario Guimarães Gomes Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri.
  • Nicson Nongelle Gomes Pinheiro Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri.
  • Jaqueline Maria da Silva Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri.
  • Deborah Faragó Jardim Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri.
  • Alexandre Faissal Brito Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X25400

Keywords:

GeoGebra, Didactic Engineering, Teaching, Area, Volume, Revolution Solids.

Abstract

This research was developed based on the principles of the Didactic Engineering, to study and discuss the contributions that the use of the GeoGebra software may offer to understanding of mathematics concepts often used to evaluate areas and volumes of revolution solids. Was applied a didactic intervention using GeoGebra to a group of students to propitiate them knowledge enough to work with a the interactive dynamic geometry interconnecting it to empirical and formal concepts of Spatial Geometry, improving their dimensional view and preparing them for teaching Geometry. After analysis and discussions about the obtained results, were noticed a remarkable progress from the students related to the understanding of the fundamental topics of the Geometry concepts proposed in this work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Lucas Rodrigues Pereira, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri.

Discente do PROFMAT da UFVJM

Mario Guimarães Gomes, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri.

Discente do PROFMAT da UFVJM

Nicson Nongelle Gomes Pinheiro, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri.

Discente do PROFMAT da UFVJM

Jaqueline Maria da Silva, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri.

Docente do Instituto de Ciência, Engenharia e Tecnologia

Deborah Faragó Jardim, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri.

Docente do Instituto de Ciência, Engenharia e Tecnologia

Alexandre Faissal Brito, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri.

Docente do Instituto de Ciência, Engenharia e Tecnologia

References

ALMOULOUD, S. A.; COUTINHO, C. D. Q. E. S. Engenharia Didática: características e seus usos em trabalhos apresentados no GT-19/ANPEd. REVEMAT: Revista Eletrônica de Educação Matemática, Florianópolis, SC, v. 3, p. 62-77, 2008.

ARTIGUE, M. Engenharia Didática. In: BRUN, J. Didática das Matemáticas. Tradução de: Maria José Figueiredo. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget, 1996. Cap. 4. p. 193-217.

BOYER, Carl B. Historia da Matemática. Revista por Uta C. Merz- bach; tradução Elza F. Gomide – 2ª ed. – São Paulo: Edgard Blucher, 1996.

DANTAS, S. C.; FERREIRA, G. Superfícies de revolução e curvas de nível. Cap 18. 2015. Disponível em: <http://ogeogebra.com.br/arquivos/18$_$superficies $_$curvas.pdf>. Acesso em: 18 abril 2016.

DOLCE, O.; POMPEO, J. N. Fundamentos de Matemática Elementar 10: Geometria Espacial, Posição e Métrica. 5.ed. São Paulo: Atual, 2001.440 p.

JARDIM, D. F.; SILVA, J. M.; PEREIRA, M. M.; SOARES JUNIOR, E. A.; NEPOMUCENA, T. V. Estudando Limites com o Geogebra. Revista Vozes dos Vales. N. 08, Ano IV, 2015.

SILVA, J. M.; SOUZA, F. S.; CARIUS, A. C.; JARDIM, D. F. Mathematical Modeling and the Differential and Integral Calculus Teaching Challenges. ICMTA - 17. Modelling perspectives: looking in and across boundaries. Conference Contributions. Notthingham. 2015.

GIRALDO, V.; CAETANO, P.; MATTOS, F. Recursos Computacionais no Ensino de Matemática. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: SBM, 2012.

MACHADO, G. J. C. Educação e ciberespaço: estudos, propostas e desafios. Aracajú: Virtus, 2010.

MORAN, J. M. Os novos espaços de atuação do professor com as tecnologias. Revista Diálogo Educacional, Curitiba, v. 4, n. 12, p.13-21, Mai/Ago 2004. Quadrimestral.

ROSA, R. Trabalho docente: Dificuldades apontadas pelo professores no uso das tecnologias. Revista Encontro de Pesquisa em Educação, Uberaba, p.214-227, 21 out. 2013. Anual. Disponível em: <http://revistas.uniube.br/index.php/anais/article /viewFile/710/1007>. Acesso em: 12 maio 2016.

SANTAELLA, L. Da cultura das mídias à cibercultura: o advento do pós-humano. 22ª ed. Porto Alegre: Revistas FAMECOS,2003.

STEWART, J. Cálculo, volume I. 5ª.ed. São Paulo: Pioneira Thomson Learning, 2006. 578 p.

D'AMORE, B. Elementos de Didática da Matemática. 1ª.ed. São Paulo: Livraria da Física, 2007. 449 p.

ALMOULOUD, Saddo Ag. Fundamentos da Didática da Matemática. 1ª.ed. Curitiba: UFPR, 2007. 218 p.

PAIS, L. C. Didática da Matemática: uma análise da influência francesa. 3ª.ed. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica Editora, 2015. 128 p.

DANTAS, S. C.; MATHIAS, C. V. Formas de revolução e cálculo de volume. Ciência e Natura, v. 39 n.1, p. 144-155, 2017.

ALVES, F. R. V. Didática da Matemática. Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceara – IFCE, Universidade Aberta do Brasil - UAB, 2011. 198 p.

BROUSSEAU, G. Theory of Didactial Situations in Mathematics: didactique des mathématiques. 1970-1990. London: Klumer Academic Publishers, 2002.

ALVES, F. R.; V, DE LIMA, M. V. M. Revista de Produção Discente em Educação Matemática. São Paulo, v. 5 n1/2, pp. 77-96. 2016.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-18

How to Cite

Pereira, L. R., Gomes, M. G., Pinheiro, N. N. G., Silva, J. M. da, Jardim, D. F., & Brito, A. F. (2017). USING GEOGEBRA FOR TEACHING REVOLUTION SOLIDS. Ciência E Natura, 39(3), 666–686. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X25400

Issue

Vol. 39 No. 3 (2017)

Section

Teaching

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Most read articles by the same author(s)