RIVER BREEZE CIRCULATION AND PRECIPITATION BAND ON THE EAST BANK OF THE MARAJÓ BAY
Keywords:Micro line. Reflectivity. River breeze. BRAMS.
AbstractThe precipitation in Belem region is mainly due the large atmospheric systems such as ITCZ and mesoscale systems like the Instability Lines. Beside these systems, there are convective systems forced locally which also promote precipitation in this region. This paper studies a convective system, observed for first time during the campaign of the RAIN project, which is called Micro Instability Line Fluvial (MLF) because its formation is associated with river breeze circulation. The GOES 12 satellite data, radar band X, anemometer, rain gauges, disdrometer, and NCEP reanalyzes were used to study this MLF. High-resolution numerical simulation with the BRAMS model was made for this MLF, using two grids with horizontal resolution of 3 km and 1 km. The simulation results showed that the MLF was formed by river breeze from the Marajo Bay, causing precipitation since the early stages in Belem area until this MLF was on the west bank of the Marajo bay. During its propagation westward, this MLF had increased its intensity, which was maximum over the Bay of Marajo, where there is intense transportation of cargo and passengers, and shipwrecks are the most frequent type of accidents.
Alcântara CR, Silva Dias MAF, Souza EP, Cohen JCP. Verification of the role of low level jets in Amazon squall lines. Atmospheric Research. 2011;100:36-44.
Cohen JCP, Silva Dias MAF, Nobre CA. Environmental conditions associated with amazonian squall lines: a case study. Mon. Wea. Rev. 1995;123:3163-3174.
Cohen JCP, Fitzjarrald DR, D’Oliveira FAF, Saraiva I, Barbosa IRS, Gandu AW, et al. Radar-observed spatial and temporal rainfall variability near the Tapajós-Amazon confluence. RBMET. 2014;29(n. esp.):23-30.
Cotton WR, Pielke RA, Walko RL, Liston GE, Tremback CJ, Jiang H. RAMS 2001: Current status and future directions. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., Austria. 2003;82(1-4):5-29
Figueroa SN e Nobre CA. Precipitations distribution over central and western tropical South America. Climanálise – Boletim de Monitoramento e Análise Climática. 1990;5(6):36-45.
Fitzjarrald DR, Sakai RK, Moraes OLL, De Oliveira RC, Acevedo OC, Matthew J et al. Spatial and temporal rainfall variability near the Amazon-Tapajós confluence. JGR: Biogeosciences. 2008;113(G1):1-17.
Garstang M, Massie HL, Halverson J, Greco S. Amazon coastal squall lines. Part I: Structure and Kinematics. Mon. Wea. Rev. 1994;122:608-622.
Lu L, Denning AS, Silva Dias MAF, Silva Dias P, Longo M, Freitas SR, Saatchi S. Mesoscale circulations and atmospheric CO2 variations in the Tapajós region, Pará, Brazil. JGR. 2005;110(D21102):1-17.
Machado LAT, Silva Dias MAF, Morales C, Fisch G, Vila D, Albrecht R et al. The chuva project: How does convection vary across Brazil? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 2014;1365-1380.
Mesquita RLC e Silva RR. Insights of meso and micro-scale processes for the Caxiuanã forest region from high resolution simulation. RBMET. 2012;27(2): 253-261.
Molion LCB. Climatologia dinâmica da região amazônica: Mecanismos de prcipitação. RBMET. 1987;2:107-117.
Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. HESS. 2007;11:1633-1644.
Pielke RA, Cotton WR, Walko RL, Tremback CJ, Lyons WA, Grasso LD et al. A comprehensive meteorological modeling system – RAMS. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 1992;49:69-91.
Santos SHM. Acidentes com transportes hidroviários e os extremos meteorológicos no nordeste da Amazônia [dissertação]. Belém: Universidade Federal do Pará; 2015. 92 p.
Sodré GRC. Estudo da convecção de mesoescala em diferentes superfícies na amazônia oriental [dissertação]. Belém: Universidade Federal do Pará; 2013. 65 p.
Silva Dias MAF, Silva Dias PL, Longo M, Fitzjarrald DR, Denning AS. River breeze circulation in eastern Amazonia: observations and modeling results. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2004;78(1):111-121.
How to Cite
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.