RESPONSES FROM THE ADVERTISING FIELD TO PUBLIC CONTESTATION PRACTICES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2175497755115

Keywords:

Advertising, Contestation practices, Advertising production

Abstract

This article aims to explore the repercussions of public contestation practices to advertising campaigns in the market context (advertisers and agencies) and in the regulatory scenario (Advertising Self-Regulation Council - CONAR). The theoretical discussion approaches advertising as an field articulated with the social world and the people's daily practices, among them, the  contestation practices. The methodology research is qualitative with complementary quantitative resources and involves the documental analysis technique on data about Brazilian context from the years 2011 to 2020, available on news websites specialized in communication and on the CONAR`s website. The results point to reactive and empathic manifestations by advertisers and advertising agencies; they also show the actions of withdrawals, alterations, warnings and discontinuing promoted by CONAR.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Enéias Brum, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Graduated in Social Communication / Public Relations (UFRGS).

Master's student in Communication (PPGCOM/UFRGS).

Elisa Reinhardt Piedras, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Graduated in Social Communication/Advertising (UCPEL) and Visual Arts/Graphic Design (UFPEL).
Master in Communication and Information (PPGCOM/UFRGS)
PhD in Social Communication (PUCRS).
Professor of the Postgraduate Program in Communication, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

Published

2021-11-18

How to Cite

Brum, E., & Piedras, E. R. (2021). RESPONSES FROM THE ADVERTISING FIELD TO PUBLIC CONTESTATION PRACTICES. Animus.Inter-American Journal of Media Communication, 20(44). https://doi.org/10.5902/2175497755115

Issue

Section

Free Articles