This is an outdated version published on 2021-12-28. Read the most recent version.

Forms in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378666517

Keywords:

Early Wittgenstein, Logical Form, Context Principle

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to elucidate the tractariana idea of logical form. We get started from the identification of significant conceptual differences between occurrences of the term “form” inside Tractatus’ text. These differences allow the obtainment of two distinct concepts. The first of them is the form of objects; the second, the pictorial form. Inside this later notion it’s possible to identify the idea of a logico-pictorial form, which is distinct from pictorial form due to its generality. We argue that both the notion of form of objects and of logico-pictorial form (or simply “logical form”) can be understood under the light of a reflection about a Wittgensteinean appropriation of Frege’s Context Principle. The relevant use of this principle for the notion of logical form, which sets up an expedient also used by Frege in his explanation about the function of variable letters in mathematics, involves the Tractarian notion of expression [Aüsdruck]. In turn, the form of objects is a concept that arises from what seems an ontological intrusion of the principle in the Tractarian ontology. This movement counters Frege’s assumption about the principle’s range, whose application is restricted to language and isn’t extended to the reference or meaning [Bedeutung] of linguistic signs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luiz Henrique da Silva Santos, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

Mestre em filosofia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro.

References

BAKER, G. P; HACKER, P. M. S. Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning Part I: Essays. Blackwell Publishing, 2005. Second, extensively revised edition by P. M. S. Hacker.

BLANCHETTE, P. A. Frege’s Conception of Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

CHEUNG, L. K. C. Variable names and constant names in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations, v. 28, n. 1, p. 14–42, 2005.

CONANT, J. Two conceptions of die ̈Uberwindung der Metaphysik: Carnap and early Wittgenstein. In: McCarthy, T; Stidd S. C. (ed.) Wittgenstein in America. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001, p. 13–61.

CUTER, J. V. G. A lógica do Tractatus. Manuscrito, v. 25, n. 1, p. 87–120, 2002.

DUMMETT, M. Frege: Philosophy of Language. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.

FREGE, G. Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formels-prache des reinen Denkens. Louis Nebert, 1879.

FREGE, G. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Breslau: Verlag von Wilhelm Koebner, 1884.

FREGE, G. ̈Uber die grundlagen der geometrie I. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker v. 15, p. 293–309, 1906.

FREGE, G. The Foundations of Arithmetic. 2 ed. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1960. Translated by J. L. Austin.

FREGE, G. Os Fundamentos da Aritmética. In: V. Civita. Os Pensadores XXXVI. Ed. Abril Cultural, 1974, pp. 201–282. Seleção e Tradução de Luís Henrique dos Santos.

FREGE, G. Funktion und Begriff (1891). In: G. Pätzig (ed.). Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung: Fünf logische Studien. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2008, p. 1–22.

FREGE, G. ̈Uber Sinn und Bedeutung (1892a). In: G. Pätzig (ed.). Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung: Fünf logische Studien. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2008, p. 23–46.

FREGE, G. ̈Und Begriff und Gegenstand (1892b). In: G. Pätzig (ed.). Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung: Fünf logische Studien. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2008, p. 47–60.

FREGE, G. Sobre o sentido e a referência. In: Alcoforado, P. (ed.). Lógica e Filosofia da Linguagem. 2 ed. EDUSP, 2009, p. 129–158. Seleção, introdução, tradução e notas de Paulo Alcoforado.

FRIEDLANDER, E. Signs of Sense: Reading Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 2001.

HYDER, D. The Mechanics of Meaning. Berlin and New York: Walter De Gruyter, 2002.

ISHIGURO, H. Use and reference of names. In: Winch, P. (ed.). Studies in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969, p. 20–51.

JOHNSTON, C. Symbols in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. European Journal of Philosophy v. 15, n. 3, p. 367–394, 2007.

MARQUES, E. D. R. Sobre a distinção entre Tatsache e Sachverhalt no Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus de Ludwig Wittgenstein. O que nos faz pensar, v. 2, n. 2, p. 54–61, 1990.

MARQUES, J. O. A. A ontologia do Tractatus e o problema dos Sachverhalte não-subsistentes. O que nos faz pensar, v. 3, n. 5, p. 51–66, 1991.

PROOPS, I. Wittgenstein on the Substance of the World. European Journal of Philosophy, v. 12, n. 1, p. 106-126, 2004.

RECK, E. H. Frege-Russell numbers. In: BEANEY, M. (ed.) The Analytic Turn: Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. Routledge, 2007, p. 33–50.

RICKETTS, T. Concepts, objects and the context principle. In: POTTER, M.; RICKETTS, T. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Frege. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010, p. 149–219.

RUFFINO, M. O princípio do contexto em Frege e Wittgenstein. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Campinas, 1990. Disponível em: http://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/279320. Acesso em: 29 mai. 2020.

STENIUS, E. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. New York: Cornell University Press, 1964.

WITTGENSTEIN, L; McGuinness, B. Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and Documents 1911-1951. Blackwell Publishing, 2008.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Notebooks 1914-1916. New York and Evanston: Harper & Row, 1969. Edited by G. H. von Wright and G. E. M Anscombe, with an English translation by G. E. M Anscombe.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. 3 ed. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, 2017. Tradução, apresentação e ensaio introdutório de Luiz Henrique Lopes dos Santos; introdução de Bertrand Russell.

Published

2021-12-28

Versions

How to Cite

Santos, L. H. da S. (2021). Forms in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Voluntas: International Journal of Philosophy, 12(2), e04. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378666517