Fichte against Schopenhauer? The doctrine of the “Self” as a theoretical source of the pure subject of knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378633773Keywords:
Schopenhauer, Fichte, Self, Pure subject of knowledgeAbstract
The paper investigates the possible genesis of Schopenhauer's concept of “pure subject of knowledge” through an analysis of the notes of the young
Schopenhauer about some of Fichte's classes.
Downloads
References
SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. Sämtliche Werke. Hrsg. von Arthur Hübscher. 7 Bde. Wiesbaden: F. A.Brockhaus, 1972.
SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. Der Handschriftliche Nachlaß. Hrsg. von Arthur Hübscher. 5 Bde. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Waldemar Kramer, 1966-1975.
SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. Schopenhauer’s Early Fourfold Root. Transl. by F. C. White, Aldershot: Avebury, 1997.
SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. Manuscript Remains. Edit. by Arthur Hübsche: Transl. by E. F. J. Payne. 4vols. Oxford: Berg, 1988.
KANT, Immanuel. Kants gesammelte Schriften. Hrsg. von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: Druck und Verlag von Georg Reimer, 1900ff.
FICHTE, Johann Gottlieb. Fichtes Werke. Hrsg. v. I. H. Fichte. 11Bde. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1971.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The submission of original manuscripts to this journal implies the transference, by the authors, of the copyrights for printed and digital publication. The copyrights of a published manuscript belong ultimately to the author, and only the copyright for its first publication is reserved to the journal. Authors may only use the same results in other publications explicitly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication.
Licence
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) - This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.