.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378692063Schlagworte:
., .., ..., ....Abstract
.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Baron, J. (1995). Myside bias in thinking about abortion. Thinking & Reasoning, 1(3), 221-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13546789508256909
Barreiro, A., & Castorina, J. A. (2022). Extendiendo la conversación sobre los juicios morales: contribuciones del intuicionismo social, el constructivismo y la psicología cultural. Revista de humanidades de Valparaíso, (19), 181-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp181-202
Candiotto, L., & Renaut, O. (Eds.). (2020). Emotions in Plato. Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004432277
Churchland, P. S., & Suhler, C. L. (2022 [2014]). Agencia y control: el rol subcortical en las buenas decisiones. Revista de humanidades de Valparaíso, (20), 231-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss20pp231-250
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, rationality and the human brain. Putnam.
de Waal, F. (1996). Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674033177
Fine, C. (2006). Is the emotional dog wagging its rational tail, or chasing it? Reason in moral judgment. Philosophical explorations, 9(1), 83-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790500492680
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological review, 108(4), 814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.108.4.814
Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. En R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852-870). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195126013.003.0045
Haidt, J. (2006). The happiness hypothesis: Finding modern truth in ancient wisdom. Basic books.
Haidt, J. (2013). Moral psychology for the twenty-first century. Journal of moral education, 42(3), 281-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2013.817327
Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008). Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. En W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 181-217). The MIT Press.
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133(4), 55-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365555
Haidt, J., Bjorklund, F., & Murphy, S. (2000). Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia, 191, 221.
Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of personality and social psychology, 65(4), 613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.65.4.613
Hume, D. (1969 [1739-1740]). A treatise of human nature. Penguin.
Kohlberg L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive–developmental approach to socialization. En D. A. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347-480). Rand McNally.
Kohlberg L. (1971). Stages of moral development. En C. M. Beck, B. S. Crittenden, E. V. Sullivan (Eds.), Moral education. University of Toronto Press.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological bulletin, 108(3), 480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.108.3.480
Loewe, D. (2022). Nudges y psicología de colmena: empujoncitos a la felicidad comunal. Revista de humanidades de Valparaíso, (19), 125-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp125-162
Mercier, H. (2017). Confirmation bias–myside bias. En Rüdiger F. Pohl, Cognitive illusions (pp. 78-91). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003154730-7
Moore, G. E., (1993 [1903]), Principia Ethica. Cambridge University Press.
Perkins, D. N. (1989). Reasoning as it is and could be: An empirical perspective. En D. M. Topping, D. C. Crowell, & V. N. Kobayashi (Eds.), Thinking across cultures (pp. 175–194). Erlbaum.
Perkins, D. N., Farady, M., & Bushey, B. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence. En James F. Voss, David N. Perkins, Judith W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 83-106). Routledge.
Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. En L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123-205). Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
Rawls J. (1999 [1971]) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042582
Ross, W. D., (2002 [1930]). The Right and the Good. Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199252653.001.0001
Saltzstein, H. D., & Kasachkoff, T. (2004). Haidt's moral intuitionist theory: A psychological and philosophical critique. Review of general psychology, 8(4), 273-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.273
Scotto, C. (2022). Moral Cognition and Psychological Cognition: Intuitions Come First. Revista De Humanidades De Valparaíso, (19), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp15-42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp15-42
Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. G. (1987). Culture and moral development. The emergence of morality in young children, 1-83.
Sidgwick, H., (1967 [1874]). The Methods of Ethics. Macmillan.
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.
Turiel, E., Killen, M., & Helwig, C. C. (1987). Morality: Its structure, function, and vagaries. En J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 155-243). University of Chicago Press
Vozzola, E. C., & Senland, A. K. (2022). Moral Development. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295461
Vranka, M. A., & Bahník, Š. (2016). Is the emotional dog blind to its choices? An attempt to reconcile the social intuitionist model and the choice blindness effect. Experimental Psychology, 63(3), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000325
Zaborowski, R. (2012). Some remarks on Plato on emotions. Mirabilia: electronic journal of antiquity and middle ages, (15), 141-170.
Zavadivker, N. (2022). Hacia un intento de desentrañar asunciones normativas implícitas en el pensamiento de Haidt. Revista de humanidades de Valparaíso, (19), 245-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp245-269
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2025 Joaquín Suárez
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International.
Die Einreichung von Originalen an diese Zeitschrift impliziert seitens der Autoren die Übertragung der Rechte zur gedruckten und digitalen Veröffentlichung. Die Urheberrechte für die publizierten Artikel liegen beim Autor, wobei der Zeitschrift das Recht zur Erstveröffentlicheng zukommt. Die Autoren dürfen dieselben Resultate in anderen Publikationen verwenden, wenn sie deutlich auf unsere Zeitschrift als ursprüngliches Publikationsmedium hinweisen.
Lizenz
Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
