Does the “no” to death offer the “yes” to therapeutic obstination?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/217976923165Keywords:
Medical futility, Thanatology, Bioethics, Health professionalAbstract
Objective: this article aims at discussing the denial of death and the therapeutic obstination practice. Methods: two reflexive categories were developed. The first one was the culture of denial of death, and the second one was the technology to “put death away”. Results: in the first category, psycho-socio-cultural aspects were described, approaching the meanings of the human finitude, and possible actions that could occult the end of life from the routine of people. The second one concerns definitions of therapeutic obstination, bioethical questions that approach such matter, and professional and family interventions for the development of such practice. Conclusion: the “no” to death may favor therapeutic obstination, and, while the culture of denying death and the abusive use of technology regarding extending life remain, the challenge to pursue more humanitarian actions considering health practices will be even greaterDownloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.