Sustainable construction: a bibliographic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130864001Palabras clave:
Housing, Sustainability, UrbanizationResumen
The urbanization process causes major changes in nature, as well as other activities. When it comes to urbanization, we need to think far beyond the city management process that involves the issue of water, air and soil quality. It is necessary to promote sustainability more broadly, so we can also promote it through housing. The aim of this paper is to present a reflection on the need for sustainable housing as a way to promote care for the environment. The methodology used for the development of this research was the qualitative approach carried out through a bibliographic research. In terms of results, we must consider that sustainable housing, despite having a higher cost in the construction process, brings benefits such as the possibility of generating energy by solar panels, using water, composting waste, etc. In other words, the gains from this type of housing extend to the environment, as they represent an economy of natural resources, as well as the development of a more sustainable city. At the present moment in which we find ourselves in an environmental crisis, only changes in production processes are not enough to promote sustainability.Descargas
Citas
AMARO NETO, João. Sustentabilidade e produção: teoria e prática para uma gestão ambiental. São Paulo: Atlas, 2011.
ASBEA. - Associação Brasileira dos Escritórios de Arquitetura. Princípios básicos para uma arquitetura sustentável e materiais sustentáveis. 2020. Disponível em: http://www.forumdaconstrucao.com.br/conteudo.php?a=23&Cod=1747.
ARAUJO, Ana Célia Baía. PESSOA, Zoraide Souza. O desafio das Cidades Sustentáveis: prós e contras de uma proposta para o desenvolvimento urbano. Anais XVIII ENANPUR 2019.
ARAÚJO, Viviane Miranda. Práticas recomendadas para a gestão mais sustentável de canteiros de obras. 2009. Dissertação (Mestre em Engenharia) - Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2009.
BOERI, Stefano; BARRECA, Gianandrea.; VARRA, Giovanni La. VERTICAL FOREST. Boeri-Stefano Boeri Architeti, 2020, pag. 1. Disponível em: https://www.stefanoboeriarchitetti.net/en/proect/vertical-forest/. Acesso em: 29 de set. 2020.
CAMPOS, Elisa. Itália terá a primeira floresta vertical do mundo. Época Negócios.Globo.com, 15, dez. 2011. Disponível em: http://epocanegocios.globo.com/Revista/Common/0,,EMI284889-16381,00-ITALIA+TERA+A+PRIMEIRA+FLORESTA+VERTICAL+DO+MUNDO.html. Acesso em: 2, jul. 2020.
CAMPOS, Vânia Barcellos Gouvêa. Uma visão da mobilidade urbana sustentável. Cetrama (UFBA), v. 03, p. 26-30, 2007. Disponível em: http://lattes.cnpq.br/9627317574743825. Acesso em: 18 de mai. 2020.
DINIZ, Isabel Sousa. A casa ambientalmente sustentável. 2008. Programa de Pesquisa e iniciação Científica (Arquitetura e Urbanismo FEA-FUMEC) - FUMEC, [S. l.], 2008.
FARIAS. Ariadne S. de. et al. Infraestrutura urbana sustentável: conceitos e aplicações sob a perspectiva do arquiteto e urbanista. Cadernos de Arquitetura e Urbanismo v.25, n.36, 1º sem. 2018.
GÜNTHER, Wanda R.; GIULIO, Gabriela Marques. Ambiente urbano e sustentabilidade: desafios e oportunidades, 2018. Disponível em: http://colecoes.sibi.usp.br/fsp/files/original/35de9b723bd4a3d4a28d0872990fbba3.pdf. Acesso em: 16 de mai. de 2020.
JACOBI, Pedro Roberto. Educação Ambiental e o Desafio da Sustentabilidade Socioambiental. O Mundo da Saúde, v. 30, p. 524-531, 2006.
JAMIESON, Dale. Ética e Ambiente. São Paulo: SENAC, 2010
JOUBERT, Sylvie. Droit à la ville: Droit de la ville. Tese de doutorado. Paris: Université Paris 2, 2 tomos, 2002.
LEFF, Enrique. Saber ambiental: sustentabilidade, racionalidade, complexidade, poder. 9. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 2012
LIMA, Telma Cristiane Sasso de. MIOTO, Regina Célia Tamaso. Procedimentos metodológicos na construção do conhecimento científico: a pesquisa bibliográfica. Revista Katálysis. Florianópolis. v. 10, n. esp., p. 37-45. 2007.
MATOS, Ana Cristina. COSTA, Carlos Augusto. Cidades inteligentes: O desafio do planejamento sustentável. Cadernos: FGV Projetos, Rio de Janeiro, Ano 13, N° 32, 168-185, Março de 2018
MAY, Peter H; LUSTOSA, Maria Cecília; VINHA, Valéria. Economia do meio ambiente: teoria e prática. Rio de Janeiro: Elesvier, 2003.
REIGOTA. Marcos. Meio ambiente e representação Social. 2ºed. São Paulo: Cortez. 1997.
VIEIRA, M. M. F.; ZOUAIN, D. M. Pesquisa qualitativa em administração. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2006.
XIMENES, Natália Lacerda Bastos. Morfologia Urbana: teorias e suas interrelações. Rio de Janeiro, 2016. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Programa de Engenharia Urbana, Escola Politécnica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2016.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
