La inclusión de los niños con necesidades educativas especiales en la práctica pedagógica de una escuela municipal en el municipio de Vila Nova do Sul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820646Palabras clave:
Inclusión, Formación, Alumnos con NEEResumen
Esta investigación tiene por objetivo trabajar la socialización, humanización y orientación de los profesores y operarios sobre la importancia de la inclusión escolar, así como analizar las relaciones sobre la inclusión en la escuela e identificar las principales barrera reconocidas pela inserción de alumnos con necesidades educacionales especiales en turmas de enseñanza regular. Los procedimientos metodológicos constituyen en un plan de intervención, compuesto por talleres, entrevista y una charla. El análisis apuntó que loseducadores de la escuela municipal de Vila Nueva del Sur posen una visión de integración y no de inclusión y reconocen la falta de formación, políticas públicas y comprometimiento para que la inclusión ocurra de hecho. De esa forma aun que muy se haya hablado sobre la inclusión escolar, ese proceso va además el simple acto de colocar un alumno con NEE dentro de la escuela regular, esa acción debe prever un comprometimiento colectivo de la escuela y de los agentes envueltos, así como unproyecto-político pedagógico y planificación de la formación continuada para los servidores de la educación. Así, se concluyeque con formación y comprometimiento la educación inclusiva aún con su complexibilidade podrá acontecer de manera coherente contribuyendo así para cambiar la sociedad, incluyendo sus ciudadanos de manera más justa.Descargas
Citas
ALVES, Zélia Mana Mendes Biasoli; SILVA, Maria Helena G. F. Dias.Análise Qualitativa de Dados de Entrevista: uma proposta. Disponível em: http://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/viewFile/46422/50178. Acesso em: 15 set. 2015.
BAPTISTA, Claudio Roberto; JESUS, Denyse Meirelles de. Avanços em políticas de inclusão: o contexto da educação especial no Brasil e em outros países. Porto Alegre: Mediação, 2009.
CARVALHO, Rosita Edler. Educação inclusiva: com os pingos nos "is". 4. ed. Porto Alegre: Ed. Meditação, 2006.Disponível em: www.deacoordenacao.blogspot.com/2013. Acesso em: 15 set. 2015.
Educação Inclusiva. Disponível em: https://plus.google.com. Acesso em: 5 jul. 2015.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. 5. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1996
SELAU, Bento. Inclusão na sala de aula. 1°ed. Porto alegre: Evangraf, 2007. BRASIl. Acesso em: 5 jul. 2015.
WERNECK, Claúdia. Um tiro no pé. Disponível em: http://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br. Acesso em: 15 set.2015.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
