Rural tourism and family farm base agroecological: an experience in the city of Abreu e Lima - PE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613087230Keywords:
Agroecology, Agro-ecotourism, Agro-ecological transitionAbstract
It is intended, in the present work was to analyze the relationship between family farming andrural tourism and its impacts on local development, from a case study conducted at St. John RanchArea Agroecological in Abreu e Lima, State of Pernambuco. Identified in this study was thedemonstration of activities related to the development of agro-ecotourism and, therefore, soughtto identify aspects of the transition process agroecological through direct observation of socialpractices on the property. In site visits was evident the potential for exploitation of a type oftourism that combines recreation and preservation/conservation of ecological agroecosystems,being an aggregate value which favors family relationship with visitors interested in researching orjust meet and eat some processed products on site. The methodology used was direct observationof the phenomenon and, in a second step, we performed a literature search on the key themesdiscussed here.
Downloads
References
CAPORAL, F. R; COSTABEBER, J. A; PAULUS, G. Agroecologia: matriz disciplinar ou novo paradigma para o desenvolvimento rural sustentável. Brasília, DF: 2006
COSTABEBER, J. A; MOYANO E. E. Transição Agroecológica e Ação Social Coletiva. 2000.
GIL, A. C. Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa Social. São Paulo: Atlas, 1994.
LAURENTI, A. C.; GROSSI, M. E. O novo rural brasileiro: uma análise nacional e regional. Brasília: Embrapa, 1999.
MOLETA, V. F.; GOIDANICH, K. L. Turismo Rural. Porto Alegre, RS: SABRAE/RS, 2000.
RODRIGUES, A. (org.) Turismo e geografia: reflexões teóricas e enfoques regionais. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1998.
SILVA, E. L.; MENEZES, E. M. Metodologia da pesquisa e elaboração de dissertação. Florianópolis: Laboratório de Ensino à Distância da UFSC, 2001.
ZIMMERMANN, A. Planejamento e Organização do Turismo Rural no Brasil. In: ALMEIDA, J. A;
FROEHLICH, J. M; RIELD, M (orgs.). Turismo Rural e Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Campinas, SP: Papirus, 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
