Environmental awareness of students of vocational course of bakery - PROEJA FIC Cacequi (RS)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083958Keywords:
EJA, Natural Sciences, Environmental awarenessAbstract
This study aimed to evaluate the degree of ecological knowledge of students at the Training Course on Bakery, modality Education for Youth and Adults (EJA), a public school in the municipality of Cacequi (RS, Brazil); with this, we hope to contribute to improving the quality of the teaching of Natural Sciences Course and an expansion of environmental awareness of their students. The instrument was applied in class of a closed questionnaire addressing a variety of environmental issues, but one which favored those matters disclosed by the most easily accessed by the population, such as television and newspapers in the same way, prominence was given to issues of national and regional interest. The analysis of responses showed that, in most cases, students are unaware of the environmental issues addressed by the questionnaire, even those that are present in their day to day. Thus becomes evident, the need for interference by the school in bringing information and encourage a more participatory attitude of his students, giving them the opportunity to become citizens committed to their world.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Educação para jovens e adultos: Ensino Fundamental – primeiro segmento. São Paulo: Ação Educativa. Brasília: MEC, 1999.
CARVALHO, J.A.M. de. O tamanho da população brasileira e sua distribuição etária: uma visão prospectiva, São
Paulo: ABEP, Anais V Encontro Nacional de Estudos Populacionais, 1988. Disponível em: http://www.abmp.org.br/textos/361.htm. Acesso em: 25 jun 2010.
MELO, Aline Fernandes; Refletindo a Educação Ambiental: Percepções e práticas dos Professores de Geografia em escolas públicas do município de Viçosa - MG, 2006.
RIBEIRO, Vera Maria Masagão. Educação de jovens e adultos: proposta curricular para o 1º segmento do ensino
fundamental. São Paulo: Ação Educativa; Brasília: MEC, 1997.
TILBURY, D.; WALFORD, R. Grounded theoriy: defying the dominant paradigm in environmental education research. In: Understanding geographical and environmental education. Oxford: OUP, 1996.
UNESCO. Congresso Internacional UNESCO/PNUMA sobre la educacion y la Formacion Ambientales, Moscou, in: Educação Ambiental, Situação Espanhola e Estratégia Internacional. DGMA-MOPU, Madrid, 1987.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
