Ações educativas ambientais no cotidiano de uma escola municipal de Santa Maria, RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083910Keywords:
Elementary School, Educational Actions, EnvironmentAbstract
The great challenge of the environmental issue is to approach questions in a complete way, avoiding focus on isolated points, even though on the relevant ones. The practice of environmental education in school routines shows alternatives for the involvement of all the school community with continuous actions and not isolated ones. There are possibilities for an interdisciplinary environmental education aiming to problematize the understanding, to show that the educator plays a fundamental role in this new teaching perspective, creating, recreating, reinventing, doing what one does not know what to do, letting oneself learn with everybody’s participation. It is known that the everyday actions are the ones that bring great changes. This work brings a reflection on the environmental education in school and the ethics of care. The main objective was to develop educational actions with students of the 3rd year of the Municipal Elementary School Zenir Aita, of Santa Maria, RS, about questions involving the environment through lectures, leaflets, walks around the school for a landscape reading, interviews with the school principal, the teachers and workers. The actions developed were: garbage in the correct place, building of a worm farm, human clock - built with medicinal plants, use of banana peels to make cakes. Then, it was observed that the school offers a favorable environment for the environmental education to be continuously developed involving all school disciplines, in the construction of knowledge.Downloads
References
BARCELOS, Valdo. Educação Ambiental: sobre princípios, metodologias e atitudes. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2008 (Coleção Educação Ambiental).
BOFF, Leonardo. Ecologia: Grito da Terra: grito dos pobres. Ática: São Paulo, SP, 1995.
______. Saber Cuidar: ética do humano-compaixão pela Terra. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 1999.
______. O Casamento entre o céu e a terra. Rio de Janeiro: Salamandra, 2001.
FERRO, D. Fitoterapia: conceitos clínicos. São Paulo: Atheneu, 2006.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996.
______. Extensão ou comunicação? Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1995.
GONÇALVES, C. W. P. Possibilidades e limites da Ciência e da Técnica diante da Questão Ambiental. In: SEMINÁRIO
UNIVERSIDADE E MEIO AMBIENTE. DOCUMENTOS BÁSICOS, 2, 1990, Brasília, DF: Anais...Brasília, DF: 1990.
OLIVEIRA, E.M. de. Educação Ambiental: uma possível abordagem. 2. ed. Brasília, DF: IBAMA, 2000.
SOUZA, A. K. A relação escola-comunidade e a conservação ambiental. 2000. 89 fl. Monografia (Especialização em Educação Ambiental) - Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, 2000.
THIOLLENT, M. Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. 10. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
