Educação ambiental no contexto da Escola Municipal de Ensino Fundamental Tiradentes, município de Mata/RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083326Keywords:
Environmental Education, Student, TeacherAbstract
The present work aims to study the practices developed by teachers in relation to environmentalissues in Tiradentes elementary municipal school, Mata/RS. For that, the search reach ourobjective we adopted the deductive method and descriptive, and methodological procedureswere based on interviews with teachers guided by a research tool with open and closed questions.It was possible to know the opinion of seven teachers about the work in class on EnvironmentalEducation. With this information, the data were tabulated and interpreted, resulting in someconclusions. It was observed that there is little concern of teachers to update themselves onenvironmental issues and that environmental education is not yet fully integrated into theteaching practice classes, being addressed in simple and barely consciousness way. Informationsuch as that could serve to the practices reflection on the schools developed seeking to improvethe teaching quality.Downloads
References
BRASIL. Ministério da Educação e do Desporto. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais. Brasília. Editora: MEC/SEF,1997.
BRASIL. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais. Temas Transversais. Brasília, MEC/SEF, 1998.
FAZENDA, Ivani C. Arantes. Interdisciplinaridade: um projeto em parceria. São Paulo: Loyola, 1991. GUIMARÃES, Mauro. A dimensão ambiental na educação. São Paulo: Papirus, 1995.
MORAES, Antonio Carlos Robert. Meio ambiente e ciências humanas. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1997.
MOREIRA, A. F. Currículos e Programas no Brasil. Campinas: Papirus, 1995.
PEREIRA, A.B. Aprendendo Ecologia Através a Educação Ambiental. Porto Alegre: Sagra, 1993.
PUNTEL, G. A. Os mistérios de ensinar e aprender geografia. In: KAERCHER, N. A. (Orgs.). Geografia práticas pedagógicas para o ensino médio. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2007.
RAYS, O. A. Trabalho Pedagógico: hipótese de ação didática. Santa Maria: Palotti, 2000.
VASCONCELLOS, C. dos S. Avaliação Concepção Dialética-Libertadora do Processo de Avaliação Escolar.São Paulo: Libertad, 2001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
