A percepção de questões ambientais por crianças da educação infantil: estudo de caso sobre as mudanças climática globais no Núcleo de Educação Infantil Ipê Amarelo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613082288Keywords:
Environmental education, Infantile Education, Climatic ChangesAbstract
This study investigated, initializing from the daily pedagogic practice, the children's of infantileeducation understanding on the global climatic changes. In this purpose, the research assumes aqualitative approach, characterized as a case study, using as source of information a group ofpreschool children, in the Nucleus of Infantile Education Ipê Amarelo of Universidade Federal deSanta Maria. The information presented by the children, before and after the developed work,reveals that there was an increase of the previous knowledge of the group, considering an importantunderstanding of the thematic approached. Were observed, in the children's daily relationships in theschool, concerned attitudes with the conservation and preservation of the environment by entirely.Downloads
References
ARAUJO, M. I. DE O. A universidade e a formação de professores para a educação ambiental. In: Revista Brasileira de Educação Ambiental, n/ zero. Brasília: Rede Brasileira de Educação Ambiental, 2004.
BARBOSA, M. C. S.; HORN, M. da G. S. Projetos na educação infantil. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2008.
BRASIL, Ministério da Educação - MEC/SEF. Referencial Curricular Nacional para a Educação Infantil: introdução, vol.1, Brasília, 1998.
BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Parâmetros Nacionais de qualidade para a educação infantil vol.2, Brasília, 2006. Disponível em: http://portal.mec.gov.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=article. Acesso em: 24 jan. 2010.
BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Parâmetros Nacionais de qualidade para a educação infantil vol.1, Brasília, 2006. Disponível em: http://portal.mec.gov.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=article. Acesso em: 24 jan. 2010.
BRASIL. Ministério da Educação - MEC/SEF. Referencial Curricular Nacional para a Educação Infantil: Conhecimento de mundo, vol.3, Brasília, 1998.
FORTUNA, T. R. (Re) criar brinquedos, reciclar a vida. In: Revista Pátio, Ano xII, nº 46 Mai/jul 2008.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2004.
HENN, R.& BASTOS, F. P. de. Desafios Ambientais na Educação Infantil. In: Revista Eletrônica de Mestrado em Educação Ambiental, vol.20, jan/jun de 2008.
IPCC - Painel Intergovernamental sobre Mudança do Clima - IPCC, Mudança do Clima 2007: A Base das Ciências Físicas, Contribuição do Grupo de Trabalho I ao Quarto Relatório de Avaliação do IPCC, 2007.
MARTINS, G. A. Estudo de caso: uma estratégia de pesquisa. São Paulo: Atlas, 2006.
MINAYO, M. C. de S. Ciência, técnica e arte: o desafio da pesquisa social. In: MINAYO, M. C. de S. (org.). Pesquisa social: teoria, método e criatividade. 19 ed. Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 2001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
