Land legal analysis in cities of mesoregion potiguar: notes from legal instruments for the promotion of regularization of social interest
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130821329Keywords:
Regularization of social interest, Legal analysis land, Legal instruments, Mesoregion potiguarAbstract
Considering the predominant urban informal framework in Brazil is important to note that this fact is associated with the occupation of the population socioecômica vulnerable. Regular housing is a social right that integrates other constitutional rights such as work, leisure, education and health. In this perspective, it is from the implementation of regularization of social interest that comes the opportunity to change history, because to live regularly can actually be part of the city. Therefore, studying the area to be regularized observing all its aspects is essential to the determination of an instrument best suited to each situation and thus reduce costs, time and gain quality in the service provided. Thus, this research aims to carry out a legal analysis of land municipalities of Natal meso, State of Rio Grande do Norte and from then point out the legal instruments to be used in Land regularization of social interest. For realization of this research is adopted as the method of approach a qualitative and quantitative study on the goal a case study and finally, as the procedures used in the data collection it is a documentary research and field.Downloads
References
Appolinário, F. Dicionário de Metodologia Científica. 2. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2011. 295p.
BRASIL. Constituição (1988). Artigo nº 6, de 5 de outubro de 1988. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. São Paulo: Saraiva, 1990.
BRASIL. Lei nº 11977, de 07 de julho de 2009. Dispõe sobre o Programa Minha Casa, Minha Vida – PMCMV e a regularização fundiária de assentamentos localizados em áreas urbanas. Brasília, DF.
BRASIL. Ministério das Cidades. Secretaria Nacional de Habitação e Secretaria Nacional de Programas Urbanos. Regularização Fundiária Urbana: como aplicar a Lei Federal n° 11.977/2009. Brasília: 2010. Disponível em: http://www.defensoria.sp.gov.br/dpesp/repositorio/28/documentos/cartilharfcidades.pdf. Acesso em: 1 mar. 2015.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. IBGE. Característica Urbanísticas dos Entornos dos Domicílios. Censo Demográfico 2010. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2012.
FERNANDES, Edésio. Regularização de Assentamentos Informais na América Latina. Cambrige: Lincoln Institute Of Land Policy, 2011.
GIL, Antonio Carlos. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.
MARICATO, Emínia. Conhecer para resolver a cidade ilegal. In: ASTRIOTA, L.B. (org.) Urbanização Brasileira: Redescobertas. Belo Horizonte: editora Arte, 2003. p. 78-96.
MARICATO, E.; et al. Cidades Rebeldes: passe livre e as manifestações que tomaram as ruas do Brasil. 1ª Ed. São Paulo: Boitempo: Carta Maior, 2013.
PAIVA, João Pedro Lamana. Regularização Fundiária de Interesse Social. São Paulo: Iribid, 2012.
PROGRAMA ACESSO À TERRA URBANIZADA. Meta 1: Produtos: Capacitação da Equipe; Trabalho Social; Cartografia Básica; Regularização da Base Imobiliária.. Pau dos Ferros: Daniela, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
