Medical plants as proposed interdisciplinary in youth education second segment and adult
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820454Keywords:
Adult education, Science education, InterdisciplinarityAbstract
This paper presents results of a study conducted with students of the Youth and Adult Education (EJA) School of Antonio José de Lima, city of Juscimeira - Matos Grosso, on the topic Medicinal Plants (PM). The main objective of this analysis was to identify the knowledge of students on the theme, seeking to enhance this knowledge as an interdisciplinary tool for teaching, between the disciplines of biology, physics, chemistry and mathematics. The survey took place during the period from November 2013 to September 2014. The methodological development proceeded in alternating steps as follows: initially held an interview to diagnose students' prior knowledge on the subject. In a second step, interdisciplinary lessons were taught, seeking to integrate the topic from the perspective of the students' universe, abordando knowledge of the four disciplines proposals. The outcomes of the research showed that the students had a good prior knowledge of the subject, and that this aspect favored interdisciplinary work, for when the activities were applied, these students to actively participate and answer all the questions and discussions addressed. Thus, the PM theme was confirmed positively as a good option in the proposed interdisciplinary approach to teaching adult education, as students demonstrated perseverance and dedication in all the activities proposed.Downloads
References
AMICO, D. Para que servem as plantas medicinais 2013. Disponível em http://www.dihitt.com/barra/para-que-servem-as-plantas-medicinais. Acessado dia: 18/04/2014.
CAVAGLIER, M.C.S. Plantas Medicinais na Educação de Jovens e Adultos: uma proposta interdisciplinar para Biologia e Química.[Rio de Janeiro] 2011. 92 p. 29,7 cm (Mestrado Profissional em Ensino de Ciências/IFRJ, M.Sc., Ensino, 2011). Dissertação – Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio de Janeiro, PROPEC.
COSTOLDI, R.; POLINARSKI, C. A. Utilização de recursos didáticos- pedagógicos na motivação da aprendizagem. I Simpósio Internacional de Ensino e Tecnologia. 2009.
FAZENDA, I. C. A. (org.). O que é interdisciplinaridade? São Paulo: Cortez, 2008.
FREIRE, P. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. 43. ed., São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996.
GIL, A. C.. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4.ed.-SãoPaulo: Atlas,2002.
MARCONI, M A. LAKATOS, E. M. Metodologia cientifica. 5.ed.4.reimpr- São Paulo: Atlas,2010.
OLIVEIRA, E. Interdisciplinaridade. 2010. Disponível em: http://www.infoescola.com/pedagogia/interdisciplinaridade. Acessado dia 15/04/2010
PELIZZARI, A. ; KRIEGL, M. L.; BARON, M. P.; FINCK, N.T. L.; DOROCINSKI, S. I.
TEORIA DA APRENDIZAGEM SIGNIFICATIVA SEGUNDO AUSUBEL. Rev. PEC, Curitiba, v.2, n.1, p.37-42, jul. 2001-jul. 2002. Disponível em: http://portaldoprofessor.mec.gov.br/storage/materiais/0000012381.pdf. Acessado dia 22/03/2014
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
