The cultural influence on the practice of the environmental education in two schools of the state of Amazonas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130818813Keywords:
Environmental crisis, Culture, Man - nature relationship, SustainabilityAbstract
The Amazon is a region with strategic importance in the global sphere by its immense natural and cultural potential, and there was concern on the part of all canned it. In this context, this work is to know the cultural dynamics of the students which is evident in the environmental context, ie how culture outlines how man relates to nature and how this can be the basis for the environmental education approach in the school context. The objective was to identify the influence of culture on the relationship man - nature and environmental perception of students from two public schools in the Amazon. Questionnaires were applied to students of School A, situated in a riverside community, and students of the School B, located in the capital, Manaus. It was observed that students from both schools expressed a perception that environmental is strongly influenced cultures. From this evidence, it is concluded that the reconfiguration of the relationship man - nature constitutes a challenge for educators, and know adapt these relationships the practice of environmental education becomes an important potential in the quest for sustainability of the planet.
Downloads
References
CORRÊA, S. R. M. Comunidades rurais - ribeirinhas: processo de trabalho e múltiplos saberes. In: OLIVEIRA, I. A. Cartografias ribeirinhas: saberes e representações sobre prática sociais cotidianas de alfabetizandos amazônidas. Belém: CCSE-UEPA, 2003.
LAYRARGUES, Philippe Promier. Educação ambiental com compromisso social: o desafio da superação das desigualdades. In LOUREIRO, Carlos Frederico B. (Org.).Repensar a Educação Ambiental: um olhar crítico. São Paulo: Cortez, 2009.
LEFF, Enrique. Ecologia, Capital e Cultura: a territorialização da racionalidade ambiental. (Coleção Educação Ambiental). Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2009.
LEFF, Enrique. Racionalidade ambiental: reapropriação social da natureza. Tradução Luís Carlos Cabral. Rio de Janeiro: civilização brasileira, 2006.
LEFF, Enrique. Saber ambiental - sustentabilidade, racionalidade, complexidade e poder. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes; 2001.
TOZONI-REIS, Marília Freitas de Campos. Educação ambiental: natureza razão e historia. Campinas, SP: Autores associados, 2004.
ZABOT, João Batista M e SILVA, L.C Mello da. Gestão do Conhecimento: Aprendizagem e Tecnologia, Construindo a Inteligência Coletiva. 1ª.ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
