Documentary of River Fiúza: teaching material that enables thousands discussions...
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130818749Keywords:
Educational Didactic Material, ARPA FIÚZA, DocumentaryAbstract
The preparation and editing of the video, entitled "Documentary of the Fiúza River" had the general objective to draw up and provide educational didactic material, showing the situation of the Fiúza River from the spring to its mouth, in order to dialogue, mobilize and instruct the communities to develop actions of preservation in Panambi and the region which belongs to the watershed. It is essential to discuss the importance and the facets that water resources cover, along with the intrinsic importance of the landscape, as well as its multifunctionality. To carry out the Video Documentary of the Fiúza River we sought partnerships with the City Department of Education and Culture, City Council on the Environment, City Hall of Panambi (RS), Museum and Historic Archive Professor Hermann Wegermann and Volunteer Teachers. To carry out the Video Documentary of the Fiúza River we used bibliographical research, field research, interviews, filming, video analysis, among others. The organizers are satisfied with the acceptance by the Schools and the Community in general. In this you can explore a range of contents, e.g.: agricultural activities, areas of APP (Area of Permanent Preservation) in light of the legislation in force, the usage and occupations that are installed in the vicinity and that do not meet the regulations, environmental problems, starting from the river's spring, among others.
Downloads
References
AMMES, Pedro. CORSAN. Informação verbal, 9 abr. 2015.
ARPA FIÚZA, Vídeo Documentário do Rio Fiúza, 2013. Disponível no Museu e Arquivo Histórico Professor Hermann Wegermann.
FOTOGRAFIAS: Acervo iconográfico do MAHP.
BERGAMIM, Juliane Stenzinger; GOLO, Cristiomar; HEMPE, Cléa; MORONI, Alberto Yates. A Contribuição do Rio Fiúza no Contexto Cultural Paisagístico. Revista REMOA. v(7), nº 7, p. 1689 –
, MAR - JUN, 2012.
JACQUES, D. M. Entrevista (dez.2012). Significado da palavra Porto, termo utilizado nos primeiros Planos Diretores de Panambi. Entrevistadores: Cléa Hempe e Temia Wehrmann do MAHP. Entrevista cedida a ARPA FIÚZA.
Mapa do Rio Grande do Sul: Bacias Hidrográficas. Disponível em: http://www.scp.rs.gov.br/uploads/BaciasHidrograficas.pdf. Acesso em 15 jun. 2013.
Mapa do Brasil. Disponível Power Point/ Palestra PROFILL, 2011.
Mapa da Bacia do Rio Ijuí. Disponível Power Point/ Palestra PROFILL, 2011.
FERREIRA, Dayane Magalhães. O Software Google Earth aplicado à disciplina de Geografia no 1º ano do ensino médio da escola de ensino fundamental e médio Professor Luis Felipe, Sobral - CE. Disponível em: http://www.uvanet.br/rhet/artigos_outubro_2010/google_earth.pdf. Acesso em: 9
abr. 2015.
PANAMBI. Plano de Saneamento Básico Municipal, 2009.
SILVA. C. Características da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Fiúza. In: SILVA. C. Caracterização da Bacia do rio Fiúza para Aplicação na Prevenção de Enchentes. Disponível em: http://www.projetos.unijui.edu.br/petegc/wpcontent/uploads/2010/03/TCC-Celso-da-Silva.pdf. Acesso dez. 2012.
SCHENKEL, Valdecir. A Geografia de Santa Bárbara do Sul-RS. Monografia de Graduação. UNIJUÍ, abr. 1998.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
