Retrieving, registring and disclosing the history of Panambi city: 1898 to 1954

Authors

  • Cléa Hempe Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS
  • Denise Miriam Neumann dos Santos Museu e Arquivo Histórico de Panambi, Panambi, RS
  • Janete Finger Scheuer Museu e Arquivo Histórico de Panambi, Panambi, RS
  • Temia Wehrmann Museu e Arquivo Histórico de Panambi, Panambi, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130818739

Keywords:

History of the city, Accessibility, Research, Environmental education

Abstract

This article was presented at the III International Congress on Environmental Education / Specialization in Environmental Education Course - UFSM Polo Presencial UAB Panambi / RS and IX City Seminar of the Environment. It reports an activity among several others developed by the Team that operates in the Museum and Historical Archive Prof. Hermann Wegermann - MAHP, in 2013. The activity consisted in drawing up a magazine and had as general objective to support the educational work of teachers enabling them to use it in classroom in full or, from this create activities that may put into practice with students and make the collection of the Museum and Historical Archive Prof. Hermann Wegermann (MAHP) accessible. Themethodology used in the preparation triggered several steps: bibliographic researches, interviews, field research; selection of iconographic images and documents, analysis of legislation, translations of parts of carbonless books, quantitative and budget surveys, typesetting, proofreading and printing of magazines with resources from the Darcy Ribeiro Award, edition 2012. The Magazine publishes the Museum's collection, unpublished historical sources left by our ancestors and that challenges us to further research for future productions, and makes this material available to the public, disseminating the history and challenging the Panambi citizen himself to complement the research of topics of interest available in the Historical Archive Museum. To date there have been two editions of the Magazine.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cléa Hempe, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

Graduada em Geografia, Especialista em Mídias na Educação, Especialista em Gestão e Supervisão Escolar na Escola de Educação Básica, Mestra em Geografia, Tutora Presencial no Curso de Especialização em Educação Ambiental - UFSM.

Denise Miriam Neumann dos Santos, Museu e Arquivo Histórico de Panambi, Panambi, RS

Graduada em Geografia, Setor Administrativo MAHP.

Janete Finger Scheuer, Museu e Arquivo Histórico de Panambi, Panambi, RS

Graduada em História, leciona História Rede Estadual, Professora da Rede Municipal, lotada no MAHP.

Temia Wehrmann, Museu e Arquivo Histórico de Panambi, Panambi, RS

Graduada em História, Especialista em Educação Especial, leciona na Rede Estadual, Professora da Rede Municipal, lotada no MAHP, na função de Coordenadora.

References

CABRAL, Magaly. Curso Ação Educativa em Museus, set. 2011.

CHAGAS, Mário. in: Há uma gota de sangue em cada museu, 2006, p. 30.

CHAGAS, Mário. Museália. Rio de Janeiro: JC. Editora, 1996.

HEMPE, Cléa; SANTOS, Denise Neumann de; SCHEUER Janete; WEHRMANN Temia. Revista: Panambi: de Colônia a Município, Ed. Bühring Ltda, 1ª ed.,2013.

MEYER, Hermann. Ansichtenaus.Ackerbaukolonien Neu-Württemberg und Xingu in Rio Grande do Sul (Südbrasilien), 1906. b. Acervo do MAHP.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-09

How to Cite

Hempe, C., Santos, D. M. N. dos, Scheuer, J. F., & Wehrmann, T. (2015). Retrieving, registring and disclosing the history of Panambi city: 1898 to 1954. Monografias Ambientais, 14, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130818739

Issue

REMOA, V.14, 2015, ESPECIAL EDITION: CURSO DE ESPECIALIZAÇÃO EM EDUCAÇÃO AMBIENTAL – UFSM – CAMPUS DE SANTA MARIA – RS

Section

ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATIVE PRACTICES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.