Environmental characterization and agricultural production unit of family farmers in the community of Moura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130812750Keywords:
Family farming, Diagnosis, ReflectionAbstract
The agricultural environment is the subject of speculation and study with the aim of improving the design of agroecosystems without interfering aggressively to achieve the welfare of the community and preserving the environment is only possible through sustainable management of agricultural systems. The work aimed to identify the socio-economic profile of the farmers and their care with environmental issues in production units Moura community. To perform the work visits were made to the community during the month of August 2013, and the survey interviews with the aid of semi-structured questionnaires consisting of questions of social, environmental and agricultural character were performed. Farmers in the Moura community, 44% were male and 54% female, 67% have 1-2 minimum wages and 33% less than a minimum wage, the existing environmental problems in the community caused by improper management of environmental resources 58% of respondents consider fires and trash fires 25%, and 17% trash and pesticides. Realizing that farmers have a lack of information on basic issues of harmonious coexistence with the environment making improper management in agroecosystems family that can compromise their physical, chemical and biological structure.
Downloads
References
BARRETO, H. F. M. Impacto do manejo agroecológico da caatinga em unidades de produção
familiar no Oeste Potiguar. 2007. 143f. (Dissertação Mestrado em Ciência Animal) Universidade Federal Rural do Semiárido, Mossoró, 2010.
BRASIL. Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário. Agricultura familiar no Brasil e o censo Agropecuário, Brasília, p. 9 2009.
COSTABEBER, J. A. Transição agroecológica: do produtivismo à ecologização. In: CAPORAL, F. R.; COSTABEBER, J. A. Agroecologia e extensão rural: contribuições para a promoção de desenvolvimento rural sustentável. Brasília: MDA/SAF/DATER-IICA, cap. 2, p.17-48, 2004.
EBERHARDT, D. A.; ARAÚJO R. K.; SILVA, N. T.S.; BURIOL, G. A.; Diagnóstico socioambiental da comunidade da bacia escola hidrográfica urbana, Santa Maria – RS. Disc. Scientia. Série: Ciências Naturais e Tecnológicas, S. Maria, v. 8, n. 1, p.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA (IBGE) 2006. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.org.br. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2014.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA (IBGE). Infográficos: dados gerais do município. 2013. Disponível em: http://cidades.ibge.gov.br/xtras/home.php. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2014.
LUNA, S. V. Planejamento de pesquisa: uma introdução. São Paulo: EDUC, 2005. 108 p. (Série Trilhas).
SOARES, L. G. C.; SALGUEIRO, A. A.; GAZINEU, M. H. P.; Educação ambiental aplicada aos resíduos sólidos na cidade de Olinda, Pernambuco – um estudo de caso. Revista Ciências e Tecnologia, n. 1, p. 1-9, 2007.
TOSETTO, E. M.; CARDOSO, I.M.; FURTADO, S.D. C.; A importância dos animais nas propriedades familiares rurais agroecológicas. Revista Brasileira de Agroecologia, v.8(3), p.12-25, 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
