Diagnosis for the management of solid waste in the machine shop: a case study in the municipality of dealership in Frederico Westphalen - RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130810933Keywords:
Management, Solid Waste, Mechanical WorkshopAbstract
The mechanical sector has grown steadily due to the growth in production and sales of new vehicles in the country, occurring with this, a large increase in the vehicle fleet in the country. With the largest such vehicles, so too does the need for mechanical workshops to meet this fleet, these workshops that perform various services such as the exchange of parts and lubricants, adjustments to the engine and electrical maintenance services. These services from repair shops, resulting wastes such as waste oils, metal parts, the tow and packing materials contaminated with oil, among others. Given the pollution potential of this activity generates considerable quantities of hazardous waste as well as the need for proper management of these wastes, this paper analyzes the waste management workshop from a dealership, located in the northern state of RS, through a diagnosis of solid waste management in order to offer a better management for fitness industryDownloads
References
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS – ABNT. NBR 12235: Armazenamento de resíduos sólidos Perigosos. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 1992.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS – ABNT. NBR 11174: Armazenamento de resíduos classes II - não inertes e III – inertes. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 1990.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS – ABNT. NBR ISO 10004. Resíduos Sólidos – Classificação. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2004.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS – ABNT. NBR ISO 14001. Sistemas da gestão ambiental – Requisitos com orientações para uso. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2004.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS – ABNT. NBR 10007: Amostragem de
resíduos sólidos. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2004.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS – ABNT. NBR 10006: Procedimento para obtenção de extrato solubilizado de resíduos sólidos. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2004.
ASSOCIAÇÃO DE PROTEÇÃO AO MEIO AMBIENTE DE CIANORTE - APROMAC. Guia Básico: Gerenciamento de óleos lubrificantes usados ou contaminados, 2008. Disponível em: http://www.sindirepa-sp.org.br/pdfs/guia.pdf. Acesso em: 20 de Agosto de 2013.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DO MEIO AMBIENTE - CONAMA. Resolução nº 362, de 23 de junho de 2005. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/res/res05/res36205.xml. Acesso em: 20 de Agosto de 2013.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DO MEIO AMBIENTE - CONAMA. Resolução nº 001 de 23 de janeiro de 1986. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/ conama/res/res86/res0186.html. Acesso em: 20 de Agosto de 2013.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DO MEIO AMBIENTE - CONAMA. Resolução nº 275, de 25 de abril de 2001. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/ conama/legiabre.cfm?codlegi=273. Acesso em: 20 de Agosto de 2013.
LOPES, G. V.; KEMERICH, P. D. da C. Resíduos de oficina mecânica: proposta de gerenciamento. Revista Ciências Naturais e Tecnológicas, Vol.8, n. 1, p. 81-94, 2007.
MARTINS, K. P.; MORAIS JÚNIOR, J. de A. Gestão de resíduos sólidos de oficinas mecânicas de João Pessoa/PB, 2010. Disponível em: http://www.redisa.uji.es/artSim2010/Gestao/Gest%C3%A3o%20de%20res%C3%ADduos%20s%C3%B3lidos%20de%20oficinas%20mec%C3%A2nicas%20de%20Jo%C3%A3o%20Pessoa.pdf. Acesso em: 1 de Setembro de 2013.
NUNES, G. B.; BARBOSA, A. F. F. Gestão dos resíduos sólidos provenientes dos derivados de petróleo em oficinas mecânicas da cidade de Natal/RN, 2012. Disponível em: http://editorarealize.com.br/revistas/enect/trabalhos/Comunicacao_659.pdf. Acessado em: 7 de Junho de 2013.
PAULINO, P. F. Diagnóstico dos resíduos gerados nas oficinas mecânicas de veículos automotivos do município de São Carlos – SP. 74f. 2009. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Engenharia Ambiental) – Universidade Estadual Paulista, 2009.
SAVICZI, F. Técnicas de gestão de resíduos em empresas de reparação veicular, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.grcs.com.br/sindirepa/palestra_03.pdf. Acesso em: Acessado em: 27 de Agosto de 2013.
SINAL VERDE LIXEIRAS. Tambores com tampa vai e vem - 200 litros. Disponível em: http://www.sinalverdelixeiras.com.br/images/produtos/204_g.jpg. Acessado em: 27 de Agosto de 2013.
VALLE, C. E. do. Qualidade Ambiental: ISO 14000. São Paulo: SENAC, 2002. Wikipédia: a enciclopédia livre. Localização Municipio Frederico Westphalen Rio Grande do Sul. Disponível em: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro:RioGrandedoSul_Municip_FredericoWestphalen.svg. Acesso em: 27-09-2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
