Science Education: New methodological approaches for primary education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820458Keywords:
Teaching and learning, Science education, Practical classesAbstract
It is visible the difficulties that most elementary school students, have to learn the contents that comprise the area of Natural Sciences. These contents become more difficult as students fail to associate your application to your day dia. Para minimize these shortcomings became a literature and application of practical classes and use of specific teaching material, in the ninth year class School Magda Ivana, municipality of Jaciara-MT. The goal was to use periodic table and experimental activity promoting methodology of the learning process of the chemical elements in science teaching elementary school. The activities in question refers to the use of a large and colorful periodic table and a fruit salad. The purpose of these activities was to demonstrate that there are new methods that facilitate the understanding of students and content relate science to everyday thereof. Knowing that in the ninth year is where students have their first contact with the chemical content so the activities implemented were focused on the chemical content mainly the periodic table. The results showed a good acceptance by the practical activities by students, where everyone participated actively. It was also noticeable interest thereof with respect to the contents studied.Downloads
References
Barros, C.; Paulino W. R. Ciências: Física e Química. 4 ed. São Paulo: Ática, 2009. p. 200
Brasil. Secretaria de Educação fundamental: Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: Ciências Naturais/secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Brasília; MEC/SEF, 1998. p. 21, 23, 26, 27.
Brasil. Secretaria de Educação fundamental: Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionaispara o Ensino Médio (PCNs +), secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Brasília; MEC/SEF, 1999, p. 30-38.
Brasil. Secretaria de Educação fundamental: Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionaispara o Ensino Médio (PCNs +), Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Brasília; MEC/SEF,2002. p, 87.
Delizoicov, D. et al Ensino de Ciências: Fundamentos e métodos.-3. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2009.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia saberes necessários á pratica docente. São Paulo: Paze terra, 2011. p. 24, 30, 32.
Galiazzi, M. C.; Gonçalves F. P. A natureza pedagógica da experimentação: uma pesquisa na licenciatura em química. Florianópolis – SC: 2004
Guerra, A. C. O. et al. Química no cotidiano: A Química dos alimentos e a tabela periódica,. Rio de Janeiro 2013.32 .
Ludke,M.; André, M.E.D.A. Pesquisa em educação:abordagens qualitativas. São Paulo: EPU, 1986.
Moreira, M. A. O que é afinal aprendizagem significativa? Revista cultural La Laguna Espanha, 2012.
Pazinato, M. S. Alimentos: uma temática geradora no conhecimentosquímico, Santa Maria RS, Brasil 2012
Professora Magda Ivana. Projeto Político Pedagógico. Jaciara 2013
Queiroz, M. M. A. O ensino de ciências Naturais-Reprodução ou Produção de conhecimento”Piauí, 2006.
Santos, W. L. P.; Mól, G. S. Química cidadã: materiais substâncias, constituintes, química ambiental e suas implicações sociais. vol 1 ensino médio. ed. Nova Geração-São Paulo. 2010.
Veiga, M.S. M. et al.O Ensino de Química: Algumas Reflexões. PR 2012
Zanon, L. B.;Palharini,E. M.A química no ensino fundamental de Ciências. Química Nova Escola: 1995
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
