Plan management of municipal solid waste: a case study on sorting plant
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130810938Keywords:
Joint public, Solid Waste Management, ScreeningAbstract
The process of allocation/environmentally sound disposal of solid waste, has become the subject of research and incentives by the government agencies. Based on this, the present study aims to analyze the management system of municipal solid waste in a triage unit in the municipality of Seberi - RS. The unit of study is a consortium of 30 municipalities, which meant their waste daily to the screening process and environmentally sound disposal. It could be observed that the greatest amount of material present in the waste plastic is recyclable, and the city of Fredericksburg what else contributes daily. Based on this, it was concluded that local consortium must invest heavily in a selective collection system, which would result in better conditions of recyclable materials, adhering highest values and decreasing maintenance costs of the unit.
Downloads
References
ALENCAR, M.M.M. Reciclagem de lixo numa escola pública do município de Salvador. Revista Virtual, Vol.1, n.2, p.96-113, 2005.
BRASIL. Lei Federal n 12305 de 2 de agosto de 2010. Política Nacional dos Resíduos Sólidos. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2010/lei/l12305.htm. Acessado em: 14 de Junho de 2013.
COMISSÃO DE GERENCIAMENTO DE RESÍDUOS DA UFPA - COGERE/UFPA. Plano geral de gerenciamento de resíduos DA UFPA - PGGR. Belém: UFP, 2008. 115p.
FEDERAÇÃO DAS ASSOCIAÇÕES DE MUNICÍPIOS DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL – FAMURS. Termo de Referência Para o Plano de Gestão de Resíduos Sólidos. Porto Alegre: FAMURS, 2011. 30p.
FEDERAÇÃO ESTATÍSTICA E ECONÔMICA – FEE. FEE DADOS. Disponível em: http://www.fee.rs.gov.br/feedados/consulta/sel_modulo_pesquisa.asp. Acesso em: 14 de Junho de 2013.
GARCILASSO, V.P. Geração de energia elétrica a partir do biogás proveniente de aterro sanitário. 110f.
Dissertação (Mestrado em Energia) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em energia, Universidade
de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2006.
HIRATA, A. C. R. Os recursos hídricos subterrâneos e as novas exigências ambientais. In: Revista do Instituto Geológico, Vol.14, n.2, p.39-62, 1993.
PLANO NACIONAL DE RESÍDUOS SÓLIDOS. Versão preliminar para consulta pública, 2011. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/. Acesso em: 15 de Julho de 2013.
TARTARI, L. C. Avaliação do processo de trata mento do chorume de aterro sanitário de Novo Hamburgo. Revista Liberato, Vol.6, n.6, p.66-74, 2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
