Michael Oakeshott on Social Policy

Auteurs-es

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797548301

Mots-clés :

Michael Oakeshott, Social Policy, Radical Democracy, Reformism

Résumé

Michael Oakeshott is considered one of the most important political philosophers of the last century. Although his name is bound to certain political conservatism, his work has been revisited from different ideological standpoints. This paper aims precisely to dialogue with recent interpretations of the work of Oakeshott regarding state interventionism. The question that emerges in this paper is as follows: the political philosophy of Michael Oakeshott provides a useful framework for the study of social policy? If so, what are the limits and possibilities of this framework? We demonstrate that the work of Michael Oakeshott can be useful to a reformist view of social policy.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Daniel Lena Marchiori Neto, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande

Professor Adjunto de Teoria do Estado na Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), atuando no Curso de Graduação em Relações Internacionais. Doutor em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), tendo realizado estágio de doutoramento no Colorado College, EUA. Formado em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM). Como pesquisador, atua na área de Filosofia do Direito e Teoria Política, dedicando-se especialmente à obra de Michael Oakeshott.

Références

GERENCSER, Steven Anthony. “A democratic Oakeshott”? In: Political Research Quarterly, v. 52, n. 4, dez., 1999.

GERENCSER, Steven Anthony. The Skeptic’s Oakeshott. Nova Iorque: St. Martin’s Press, 2000.

GRAY, John. Liberalisms: essays in political philosophy. Londres: Routledge, 1989.

HORTON, John. “A qualified defense of Oakeshott’s Politics of Scepticism”. In: European Journal of Political Theory, v. 4, n. 1, 2005, pp. 23-36.

MAPEL, David. “Purpose and Politics: can there be a Non-Instrumental Civil Association”? In: The Political Science Reviewer, v. 21, n. 1, 1992, pp.63-80.

MOUFFE, Chantal. “Democracia, cidadania e a questão do pluralismo”. In: Política & Sociedade, v. 1, n. 3, 2003.

MOUFFE, Chantal. The democratic paradox. Londres: Verso, 2000.

OAKESHOTT, Michael. On History and other essays. Indianápolis: Liberty Fund, 1999.

OAKESHOTT, Michael. On Human Conduct. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.

OAKESHOTT, Michael. The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Scepticism. Ed. by Timothy Fuller. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996.

PAREKH, Bhikhu. “Political Theory: Traditions in Political Philosophy”. In: GOODIN, Robert E.; KLINGEMANN, Hans-Dieter (orgs.). A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

POPPER, Karl. “Utopia and Violence”. In: The Hibbert Journal, v. 46, n. 2, 1948, pp. 109-116.

TELES, Steven; KALINER, Matthew. “The Public Policy of Skepticism”. In: Perspectives on Politics, v. 2, n. 1, mar., 2004, pp. 39-53.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2020-08-12

Comment citer

Marchiori Neto, D. L. (2020). Michael Oakeshott on Social Policy. Revista InterAção, 11(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797548301

Numéro

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020)

Rubrique

Artigos

Licence

(c) Tous droits réservés Revista InterAção 2020

Licence Creative Commons

Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.