Inovação e concentração de mercado: uma análise setorial da PINTEC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1414650972218Palabras clave:
Inovação, Concentração de mercado, PINTEC, Inovação setorial, Sistema Setorial de InovaçãoResumen
Este artigo analisa a relação entre inovação e concentração de mercado, denominada de Hipótese Schumpeteriana. Diversas variáveis da PINTEC (2008, 2011, 2014 e 2017) são utilizadas para definir as inovações em função da concentração de mercado para a Indústria de Transformação. Utiliza-se a participação de empresas inovadoras, a participação de empresas com inovação em produto ou processo, a participação de empresas com inovações organizacionais e o valor médio do dispêndio em atividades de inovação. A concentração de mercado é verificada por meio da participação das quatro maiores empresas no emprego total do setor (C4), o Índice de Lerner e a participação da mão de obra com ensino superior no emprego total do setor. Utilizam-se estimativas com dados em painel para cada variável de inovação em função da concentração de mercado. Os resultados estimados mostram diferença entre o percentual de empresas com inovação em produto ou processo e as empresas com inovações organizacionais em relação à concentração de mercado.
Descargas
Citas
ACS, Z. J.; AUDRETSCH, D. B. Innovation, market structure, and firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 69, n. 4, p. 567-574, 1987.
ACS, Z. J.; AUDRETSCH, D. B. Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. The American Economic Review, v. 78, n. 4, p. 678-690, 1988.
ADELMAN, M. A. The measurement of industrial concentration. The Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 33, n. 4, p. 269-296, 1951.
AGHION, P.; HOWITT, P. Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1998.
AGHION, P.; HOWITT, P. The economics of growth. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2009.
AGHION, P.; BLOOM, N.; BLUNDELL, R.; GRIFFITH, R.; HOWITT, P. Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 120, n. 2, p. 701-728, 2005.
ANDERSEN, E. Schumpeter’s evolutionary economics: a theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the engine of capitalism. London: Anthem Press, 2009.
ANGELMAR, R. Market structure and research intensity in high-technological-opportunity industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 34, n. 1, p. 69-79, 1985.
ARCHIBUGI, D.; EVANGELISTA, R.; SIMONETTI, R. Concentration, firm size and innovation: evidence from innovation costs. Technovation, 15(3), p. 153-163, 1995.
ARROW, K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: National Bureau Committee for Economic Research. The rate and directions of inventive activity: economic and social factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962, p. 609-626.
BECKER, W; DIETZ, J. R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firm – evidence from German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, v. 33, n. 2, p. 209-223, 2004.
BERTSCHEK, I. Product and process innovation as a response to increasing imports and foreign direct investment. Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 43, n. 4, p. 341-357, 1995.
BHATTACHARYA, M.; BLOCH, H. Determinants of innovation. Small Business Economics, v. 22, p. 155-162, 2004.
BLUNDELL, R.; GRIFFITH, R.; REENEN, J. Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. The Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 66, n. 3, p. 529-554, 1999.
BRESCHI, S.; MALERBA, F.; ORSENIGO, L. Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. The Economic Journal, v. 110, n. 463, p. 388-410, 2000.
BURNS, A. R. The process of industrial concentration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 47, n. 2, p. 277-311, 1933.
CHANDLER, A. D. The visible hand: the managerial revolution in American business. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1977.
COHEN, W. M.; KLEPPER, S. A reprise of size and R&D. The Economic Journal, v. 106, n. 437, p. 925-951, 1996.
COOKE, P.; URANGA, M. G.; ETXEBARRIA, G. Regional innovation systems: institutional and organizational dimensions. Research Policy, v. 26, n. 4-5, p. 475-491, 1997.
CONNOLLY, R. A.; HIRSCHEY, M. R&D, market structure and profits: a value-based approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 66, n. 4, p. 682-686, 1984.
CORNWALL, J.; CORNWALL, W. Growth theory and economic structure. Economica, v. 61, p. 237-251, 1994.
DASGUPTA, P. S.; STIGLITZ, J. E. Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity. Economic Journal, v. 90, p. 266-293, 1980.
D’ASPREMONT, C.; JACQUEMIN, A. Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. The American Economics Review, v. 78, n. 5, p. 1133-1137, 1988.
DIXIT, A. K.; STIGLITZ, J. E. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. The American Economic Review, v. 67, n. 3, p. 297-308, 1977.
FEGERBERG, J.; VERSPAGEN, B. Innovation studies – the emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, v. 38, n. 2, p. 218-233, 2009.
FISHER, F. M.; TEMIN, P. Returns to scale in research and development: what does the Schumpeterian hypothesis imply? Journal of Political Economy, v. 81, n. 1, p. 56-70, 1973.
FISHER, F. M.; TEMIN, P. The Schumpeterian hypothesis: reply. Journal of Political Economy, v. 87, n. 2, p. 386-389, 1979.
GALBRAITH, J. K. American capitalism: the concept of countervailing power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1962.
GEROSKI, P. A.; POMROY, R. Innovation and the evolution of market structure. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 38, n. 3, p. 299-314, 1990.
GEROSKI, P. A. Innovation, technological opportunity, and market structure. Oxford Economic Papers, v. 42, n. 3, p. 586-602, 1990.
GEROSKI, P. A. Vertical relations between firms and industrial policy. The Economic Journal, v. 102, n. 410, p. 138-147, 1992.
GEROSKI, P. A.; POMROY, R. Innovation and the evolution of market structure. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 38, n. 3, p. 299-314, 1990.
GROSSMAN, M.; HELPMAN, E. Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 8, n. 1, p. 23-44, 1994.
JADLOW, J. M. New evidence on innovation and market structure. Managerial and Decision Economics, v. 2, n. 2, p. 91-96, 1981.
KAMIEN, M. I.; SCHWATZ, N. L. Market structure and innovation: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1-37, 1975.
KAMIEN, M. I.; SCHWARTZ, N. L. Market structure and innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
KARBOWSKI, A. Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in product innovation and firm performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management, v. 20, n. 6, p. 1121-1142, 2019.
KARBOWSKI, A. Schumpeterian hypothesis revisited: on market structure and firm’ R&D. Ekonomia i Pravo, Economics and Law, v. 19, n. 4, p. 699-712, 2020.
KINUGASA, T. The Schumpeterian hypothesis and technical change. International Journal of Social Economics, v. 25, n. 6, 7, 8, p. 1207-1216, 1998.
KLEINKNECHT, A.; VERSPAGEN, B. R&D and market structure: the impact of measurement and aggregation problems. Small Business Economics, v. 1, n. 4, p. 297-301, 1989.
KOELLER, C. T. Innovation, marker structure and firm size: a simultaneous equations model. Managerial and Decision Economics, v. 16, n. 3, p. 259-269, 1995.
KOHN, M.; SCOTT, J. T. Scale economics in research and development: the Schumpeterian hypothesis. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 30, n. 3, p. 239-249, 1982.
LEE, CY. A new perspective on industry R&D and market structure. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 53, n. 1, p. 101-122, 2005.
LEE, CY.; SUNG, T. Schumpeter’s legacy: a new perspective on the relationship between firm size and R&D. Research Policy, v. 34, n. 6, p. 914-931, 2005.
LEVIN, R. C.; COHEN, W. M.; MOWERY, D. C. R&D appropriability, opportunity, and market structure: new evidence from Schumpeterian hypotheses. The American Economic Review, v. 75, n. 2, p. 20-24, 1985.
LOURY, G. C. Market structure and innovation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 93, n. 3, p. 395-410, 1979.
LUNN, J. Research and development and the Schumpeterian hypothesis: alternative approach. Southern Economic Journal, v. 49, n. 1, p. 209-217, 1982.
LUNN, J. An empirical analysis of process and product patenting: a simultaneous equation framework. Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 34, n. 3, p. 319-330, 1986.
MALERBA, F. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, v. 31, n. 2, p. 247-264, 2002.
MANSFIELD, E. Size of firm, market structure, and innovation. Journal of Political Economy, v. 71, n. 6, p. 556-576, 1963.
MCNULTY, P. J. On firm size and innovation in the shumpeterian system. Journal of Economic Issues, v. 8, n. 3, p. 627-632, 1974.
MOWERY, D. C.; ROSENBERG, N. Paths of innovation: technological change in 20th-century America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
MUKHOPADHYAY, A. K. Returns to scale in R&D and the shumpeterian hypothesis: a comment. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 33, n. 3, p. 359-361, 1985.
NEGRI, J. A.; SALERNO, M. S.; CASTRO, A. B. Inovações, padrões tecnológicos e desempenho das firmas industriais brasileiras. In: NEGRI, J. A.; SALERNO, M. S. (org.). Inovações, padrões tecnológicos e desempenho das firmas industriais brasileiras. Brasília: IPEA, 2005, p. 5-46.
NELSON, R. R.; WINTER, S. The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited. The American Economic Review, v. 72, n. 1, p. 114-132, 1982.
NELSON, R. R.; WINTER, S. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982(b).
NELSON, R. A. Productivity growth, scale economics and the Schumpeterian hypothesis. Southern Economic Journal, v. 57, n. 2, p. 521-527, 1990.
NICHOLAS, T. Why Schumpeter was right: innovation and market power, and creative destruction in 1920s America. The Journal of Economic History, v. 63, n. 4, p. 1023-1058, 2003.
NICKELL, S. J. Competition and corporate performance. Journal of Political Economy, v. 104, n. 4, p. 724-746, 1996.
RAIDER, Holly J. Market structure and innovation. Social Science Research, v. 27, n. 2, p. 1-21, 1998.
RODRIGUEZ, C. A. A comment on Fisher and Temin on the Schumpeterian hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy, v. 87, n. 2, p. 383-385, 1979.
ROSENBERG, N. Research and market share: a reappraisal of the Schumpeter hypothesis. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 25, n. 2, p. 101-112, 1976.
ROSENBERG, N. Inside the black box: technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
SCHERER, F. M. Market structure and the employment of scientists and engineers. The American Economic Review, v. 57, n. 3, p. 524-531, 1967.
SCHERER, F. M. Concentration, R&D, and productivity change. The Southern Economic Journal, v. 50, n. 1, p. 221-225, 1983.
SCHMOOKLER, J. Changes in industry and in the state of knowledge as determinants of industrial invention. In: NBER. The rate and direction of inventive activity: economic and social factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962, p. 195-232.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1943.
SCOTT, J. T. Firm versus industry variability in R&D intensity. In: GRILICHES, Z. (ed.). R&D, patents, innovation and economic change. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984, p. 233-248.
SHRIEVES, R. E. Market structure and innovation: a new perspective. Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 26, n. 4, p. 329-347, 1978.
SOLO, C. S. Innovation in the capitalist process: a critique of the Schumpeterian theory. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 65, n. 3, p. 417-428, 1951.
SHAKED, A.; SUTTON, J. Product differentiation and industrial structure. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 36, n. 2, p. 131-146, 1987.
STEINGRABER, R. Desenvolvimento das micro, pequenas e médias empresas no Brasil: desafios e tendências. Rio de Janeiro: BNDES – Pesquisa em Desenvolvimento Econômico (PDE), 2013.
SYMEONIDIS, G. Innovation, firm size and market structure: Schumpeterian hypothesis and some new themes. Paris: OECD – working paper n. 161, 1996.
TANDON, P. Innovation, market structure, and welfare. The American Economic Review, v. 74, n. 3, p. 394-303, 1984.
TIROLE, J. The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988.
TIROLE, J. A economia do bem comum. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2020.
WILLIAM, R.; CHIANG, J. Are Sutton’s predictions robust? Empirical insights into advertising, R & D, and concentration. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 44, n. 4, p. 389-408, 1996.
WILLIAMSON, O. E. Innovation and market structure. Journal of political Economy, v. 73, n. 1, p. 67-73, 1965.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Economia e Desenvolvimento
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da lingua, respeitando, porém, o exito dos autores. As provas finais não serão enviadas aos autores. Os trabalhos publicados passam a ser propriedade da revista Economia e Desenvolvimento. Deve ser consignada a fonte de publicação original. Os originais não serão devolvidos aos autores. As opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.
