Innovation and market concentration: a PINTEC sector analisys
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1414650972218Keywords:
Innovation, Market concentration, PINTEC, Sectoral Innovation, Sectoral System of InnovationAbstract
This article analyzes the relationship between innovation and market concentration, called of Schumpeterian Hypothesis. Several variables from PINTEC (2008, 2011, 2014 and 2017) are used to define innovations according to the market concentration for the Manufacturing. It is used the participation of innovative companies, the participation of companies with product or process innovation, the participation of companies with organization innovations, and the average amount of expenditure on innovation activities. The market concentration is verified through the participation of the four largest in total sector employment (C4), the Lerner Index, and the participation of workforce with higher education on total sector employment. It is used panel data estimative for each innovation variable depending market concentration. The estimated results show the difference between the percentage of companies with innovation in product or process, and the companies with organizational innovations in relation to market concentration.
Downloads
References
ACS, Z. J.; AUDRETSCH, D. B. Innovation, market structure, and firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 69, n. 4, p. 567-574, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1935950
ACS, Z. J.; AUDRETSCH, D. B. Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. The American Economic Review, v. 78, n. 4, p. 678-690, 1988.
ADELMAN, M. A. The measurement of industrial concentration. The Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 33, n. 4, p. 269-296, 1951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1926455
AGHION, P.; HOWITT, P. Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1998.
AGHION, P.; HOWITT, P. The economics of growth. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2009.
AGHION, P.; BLOOM, N.; BLUNDELL, R.; GRIFFITH, R.; HOWITT, P. Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 120, n. 2, p. 701-728, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553053970214
ANDERSEN, E. Schumpeter’s evolutionary economics: a theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the engine of capitalism. London: Anthem Press, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843313359
ANGELMAR, R. Market structure and research intensity in high-technological-opportunity industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 34, n. 1, p. 69-79, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2098482
ARCHIBUGI, D.; EVANGELISTA, R.; SIMONETTI, R. Concentration, firm size and innovation: evidence from innovation costs. Technovation, 15(3), p. 153-163, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(95)96616-2
ARROW, K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: National Bureau Committee for Economic Research. The rate and directions of inventive activity: economic and social factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962, p. 609-626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400879762-024
BECKER, W; DIETZ, J. R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firm – evidence from German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, v. 33, n. 2, p. 209-223, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.003
BERTSCHEK, I. Product and process innovation as a response to increasing imports and foreign direct investment. Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 43, n. 4, p. 341-357, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2950548
BHATTACHARYA, M.; BLOCH, H. Determinants of innovation. Small Business Economics, v. 22, p. 155-162, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000014453.94445.de
BLUNDELL, R.; GRIFFITH, R.; REENEN, J. Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. The Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 66, n. 3, p. 529-554, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00097
BRESCHI, S.; MALERBA, F.; ORSENIGO, L. Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. The Economic Journal, v. 110, n. 463, p. 388-410, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00530
BURNS, A. R. The process of industrial concentration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 47, n. 2, p. 277-311, 1933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1883689
CHANDLER, A. D. The visible hand: the managerial revolution in American business. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1977.
COHEN, W. M.; KLEPPER, S. A reprise of size and R&D. The Economic Journal, v. 106, n. 437, p. 925-951, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2235365
COOKE, P.; URANGA, M. G.; ETXEBARRIA, G. Regional innovation systems: institutional and organizational dimensions. Research Policy, v. 26, n. 4-5, p. 475-491, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
CONNOLLY, R. A.; HIRSCHEY, M. R&D, market structure and profits: a value-based approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 66, n. 4, p. 682-686, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1935995
CORNWALL, J.; CORNWALL, W. Growth theory and economic structure. Economica, v. 61, p. 237-251, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2554960
DASGUPTA, P. S.; STIGLITZ, J. E. Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity. Economic Journal, v. 90, p. 266-293, 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2231788
D’ASPREMONT, C.; JACQUEMIN, A. Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. The American Economics Review, v. 78, n. 5, p. 1133-1137, 1988.
DIXIT, A. K.; STIGLITZ, J. E. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. The American Economic Review, v. 67, n. 3, p. 297-308, 1977.
FEGERBERG, J.; VERSPAGEN, B. Innovation studies – the emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, v. 38, n. 2, p. 218-233, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.006
FISHER, F. M.; TEMIN, P. Returns to scale in research and development: what does the Schumpeterian hypothesis imply? Journal of Political Economy, v. 81, n. 1, p. 56-70, 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260006
FISHER, F. M.; TEMIN, P. The Schumpeterian hypothesis: reply. Journal of Political Economy, v. 87, n. 2, p. 386-389, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260763
GALBRAITH, J. K. American capitalism: the concept of countervailing power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1962.
GEROSKI, P. A.; POMROY, R. Innovation and the evolution of market structure. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 38, n. 3, p. 299-314, 1990.
GEROSKI, P. A. Innovation, technological opportunity, and market structure. Oxford Economic Papers, v. 42, n. 3, p. 586-602, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041965
GEROSKI, P. A. Vertical relations between firms and industrial policy. The Economic Journal, v. 102, n. 410, p. 138-147, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2234859
GEROSKI, P. A.; POMROY, R. Innovation and the evolution of market structure. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 38, n. 3, p. 299-314, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2098500
GROSSMAN, M.; HELPMAN, E. Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 8, n. 1, p. 23-44, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.23
JADLOW, J. M. New evidence on innovation and market structure. Managerial and Decision Economics, v. 2, n. 2, p. 91-96, 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090020205
KAMIEN, M. I.; SCHWATZ, N. L. Market structure and innovation: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1-37, 1975.
KAMIEN, M. I.; SCHWARTZ, N. L. Market structure and innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
KARBOWSKI, A. Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in product innovation and firm performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management, v. 20, n. 6, p. 1121-1142, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2019.11050
KARBOWSKI, A. Schumpeterian hypothesis revisited: on market structure and firm’ R&D. Ekonomia i Pravo, Economics and Law, v. 19, n. 4, p. 699-712, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2020.045
KINUGASA, T. The Schumpeterian hypothesis and technical change. International Journal of Social Economics, v. 25, n. 6, 7, 8, p. 1207-1216, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299810212694
KLEINKNECHT, A.; VERSPAGEN, B. R&D and market structure: the impact of measurement and aggregation problems. Small Business Economics, v. 1, n. 4, p. 297-301, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00393808
KOELLER, C. T. Innovation, marker structure and firm size: a simultaneous equations model. Managerial and Decision Economics, v. 16, n. 3, p. 259-269, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090160308
KOHN, M.; SCOTT, J. T. Scale economics in research and development: the Schumpeterian hypothesis. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 30, n. 3, p. 239-249, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2098217
LEE, CY. A new perspective on industry R&D and market structure. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 53, n. 1, p. 101-122, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1821.2005.00247.x
LEE, CY.; SUNG, T. Schumpeter’s legacy: a new perspective on the relationship between firm size and R&D. Research Policy, v. 34, n. 6, p. 914-931, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.04.006
LEVIN, R. C.; COHEN, W. M.; MOWERY, D. C. R&D appropriability, opportunity, and market structure: new evidence from Schumpeterian hypotheses. The American Economic Review, v. 75, n. 2, p. 20-24, 1985.
LOURY, G. C. Market structure and innovation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 93, n. 3, p. 395-410, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1883165
LUNN, J. Research and development and the Schumpeterian hypothesis: alternative approach. Southern Economic Journal, v. 49, n. 1, p. 209-217, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1058553
LUNN, J. An empirical analysis of process and product patenting: a simultaneous equation framework. Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 34, n. 3, p. 319-330, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2098574
MALERBA, F. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, v. 31, n. 2, p. 247-264, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
MANSFIELD, E. Size of firm, market structure, and innovation. Journal of Political Economy, v. 71, n. 6, p. 556-576, 1963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/258815
MCNULTY, P. J. On firm size and innovation in the shumpeterian system. Journal of Economic Issues, v. 8, n. 3, p. 627-632, 1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1974.11503212
MOWERY, D. C.; ROSENBERG, N. Paths of innovation: technological change in 20th-century America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611957
MUKHOPADHYAY, A. K. Returns to scale in R&D and the shumpeterian hypothesis: a comment. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 33, n. 3, p. 359-361, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2098544
NEGRI, J. A.; SALERNO, M. S.; CASTRO, A. B. Inovações, padrões tecnológicos e desempenho das firmas industriais brasileiras. In: NEGRI, J. A.; SALERNO, M. S. (org.). Inovações, padrões tecnológicos e desempenho das firmas industriais brasileiras. Brasília: IPEA, 2005, p. 5-46.
NELSON, R. R.; WINTER, S. The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited. The American Economic Review, v. 72, n. 1, p. 114-132, 1982.
NELSON, R. R.; WINTER, S. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982(b).
NELSON, R. A. Productivity growth, scale economics and the Schumpeterian hypothesis. Southern Economic Journal, v. 57, n. 2, p. 521-527, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1060628
NICHOLAS, T. Why Schumpeter was right: innovation and market power, and creative destruction in 1920s America. The Journal of Economic History, v. 63, n. 4, p. 1023-1058, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050703002523
NICKELL, S. J. Competition and corporate performance. Journal of Political Economy, v. 104, n. 4, p. 724-746, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/262040
RAIDER, Holly J. Market structure and innovation. Social Science Research, v. 27, n. 2, p. 1-21, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1997.0608
RODRIGUEZ, C. A. A comment on Fisher and Temin on the Schumpeterian hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy, v. 87, n. 2, p. 383-385, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260762
ROSENBERG, N. Research and market share: a reappraisal of the Schumpeter hypothesis. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 25, n. 2, p. 101-112, 1976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2098260
ROSENBERG, N. Inside the black box: technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611940
SCHERER, F. M. Market structure and the employment of scientists and engineers. The American Economic Review, v. 57, n. 3, p. 524-531, 1967.
SCHERER, F. M. Concentration, R&D, and productivity change. The Southern Economic Journal, v. 50, n. 1, p. 221-225, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1058053
SCHMOOKLER, J. Changes in industry and in the state of knowledge as determinants of industrial invention. In: NBER. The rate and direction of inventive activity: economic and social factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962, p. 195-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400879762-007
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1943.
SCOTT, J. T. Firm versus industry variability in R&D intensity. In: GRILICHES, Z. (ed.). R&D, patents, innovation and economic change. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984, p. 233-248.
SHRIEVES, R. E. Market structure and innovation: a new perspective. Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 26, n. 4, p. 329-347, 1978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2098078
SOLO, C. S. Innovation in the capitalist process: a critique of the Schumpeterian theory. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 65, n. 3, p. 417-428, 1951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1882222
SHAKED, A.; SUTTON, J. Product differentiation and industrial structure. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 36, n. 2, p. 131-146, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2098408
STEINGRABER, R. Desenvolvimento das micro, pequenas e médias empresas no Brasil: desafios e tendências. Rio de Janeiro: BNDES – Pesquisa em Desenvolvimento Econômico (PDE), 2013.
SYMEONIDIS, G. Innovation, firm size and market structure: Schumpeterian hypothesis and some new themes. Paris: OECD – working paper n. 161, 1996.
TANDON, P. Innovation, market structure, and welfare. The American Economic Review, v. 74, n. 3, p. 394-303, 1984.
TIROLE, J. The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988.
TIROLE, J. A economia do bem comum. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2020.
WILLIAM, R.; CHIANG, J. Are Sutton’s predictions robust? Empirical insights into advertising, R & D, and concentration. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. 44, n. 4, p. 389-408, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2950521
WILLIAMSON, O. E. Innovation and market structure. Journal of political Economy, v. 73, n. 1, p. 67-73, 1965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/258993
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Economia e Desenvolvimento
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal reserves the right of making changes in the originals in a normative order, orthographic and grammatical, with the objective of maintaining the language cult pattern, respecting the authors success. The final tests will not be sent to the authors. The published papers become the Economics and Development propriety. The opinions issued by the article’s authors are their own responsibility.
