Enfoques de la discapacidad basados en potencialidades, el paradigma de los apoyos y la importancia de las escalas de intensidad de los apoyos

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/1984686X48249

Palabras clave:

Enfoques basados potencialidades, autodeterminación, Escalas de Intensidade de Apoyo.

Resumen

Históricamente, la discapacidad ha sido conceptualizada dentro de modelos basados en déficit. Pero, los modelos más nuevos que enfatizan el ajuste entre la salud, el medio ambiente y los factores personales están conduciendo a enfoques basados en potencialidades para apoyar a las personas con discapacidad. Este artículo explora las implicaciones para tales modelos sobre discapacidad, en general, y educación especial, específicamente. Se discute la importancia de la autodeterminación para poner en práctica dichos modelos. Finalmente, se examina el cambio a un paradigma de apoyos como parte de la respuesta a los modelos de ajuste persona-ambiente, junto con una discusión relacionada con una serie de medidas de necesidades de apoyo.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Michael Wehmeyer, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas

Ph.D. distinguished professor at the University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.

Citas

ALMEIDA, Maria Amelia, BOUERI, Iasmin Zanchi; POSTALLI, Lidia Maria Marson. A Escala de Intensidade de Suporte–SIS no Brasil. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, vol. 16, pp. 60-64. 2016.

BUNTINX, Wil H. E. Understanding disability: A strengths-based approach. In Michael Lee Wehmeyer (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability (pp. 7-18). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 2013.

COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. General comment No. 4. 2016. Disponível em: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/article-24-education.html. Acesso em 05 Ago. 2020.

EVANS, Dave. The Internet of Things: How the Next Evolution of the Internet Is Changing Everything. 2011. San Jose, CA: Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group (IBSG). Disponível em: https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/ac79/docs/innov/IoT_IBSG_0411FINAL.pdf. Acesso em: 05 Ago. 2020.

LUCKASSON, Ruth. et al. Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (10th ed.). Washington, DC, US: American Association on Mental Retardation. 2002.

ORKWIS, Raymond; MCLANE, Kathleen. A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for student access. ERIC/OSEP Topical Brief. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children. 1998.

ROSE; David H. et al. Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Design for Learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. 2002.

SHOGREN, Karrie A. et al. Effect of intervention with the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on access and goal attainment. Remedial and Special Education, 33(5), 320-330. 2012.

SHOGREN, Karrie A. et al. Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 48(4), 256-267. 2015.

SHOGREN, Karrie A.; WEHMEYER, Michael Lee; LANE, Kathleen L. Embedding interventions to promote self-determination within multi-tiered systems of supports. Exceptionality, 24(4), 213-244. 2016.

SMITH, J. David; WEHMEYER, Michael Lee. Good blood, bad blood: science, nature and the myth of the Kallikaks. Washington DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2012.

THOMPSON, James R. et al. Supports Intensity Scale-Children’s Version: user’s Manual. Washington, D.C., American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2016a.

THOMPSON, James R. et al. Person-centered planning with the Supports Intensity Sclae-Adult Version: a Guide for Planning Teams. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2016b.

THOMPSON, James R. et al. Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 135-146. 2009.

THOMPSON, James R. et al. Supports Intensity Scale –Adult Version: users manual. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2015.

THOMPSON, James R. et al. Supports Intensity Scale: standardization and users manual. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation. 2004.

THOMPSON, James R. et al. Supports Intensity Scale-Adult Version Annual Review Protocol. Washington DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2017.

THOMPSON, James R., WEHMEYER, Michael Lee; HUGHES, Carolyn. Mind the gap! Implications of person-environment fit models of intellectual disability for students, educators, and schools. Exceptionality, 18, 168-181. 2010.

WEHMEYER, Michael Lee et al. Establishing a causal relationship between interventions to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. Journal of Special Education, 46(4), 195 – 210. 2012a.

WEHMEYER, Michael Lee et al. Support needs of adults with intellectual disability across domains: The role of technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(2), 11-22. 2012b.

WEHMEYER, Michael Lee. The story of intellectual disability: an evolution of meaning, understanding, and public perception. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. 2013a.

WEHMEYER, Michael Lee. Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 2013b.

WEHMEYER, Michael Lee. Strength-based approaches to educating all learners with disabilities: beyond special education. New York: Teachers College Press. 2019.

WEHMEYER, Michael Lee; ZHAO, Yong. Teaching students to become self-determined learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. 2020.

ZHAO, Yong. World class learners: Educating creative and entrepreneurial students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. 2012.

Publicado

2020-11-17

Cómo citar

Wehmeyer, M. (2020). Enfoques de la discapacidad basados en potencialidades, el paradigma de los apoyos y la importancia de las escalas de intensidad de los apoyos. Revista De Educación Especial, 33, e65/ 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5902/1984686X48249

Número

Sección

Dossiê: Entre lugares locais e globais das pesquisas, políticas e práticas em Educação Especial e Inclusão Escolar