Strengths-based approaches to disability, the supports paradigm, and the importance of the supports intensity scales

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/1984686X48249

Palavras-chave:

Strengths-based approaches, self-determination, Supports Intensity Scales.

Resumo

Historically, disability has been conceptualized within deficits-based models. But, newer models that emphasize the fit between health, the environment, and personal factors are leading to strengths-based approaches to supporting people with disabilities. This article explores implications for such models on disability, in general, and special education, specifically. The importance of self-determination to operationalizing such models is discussed. Finally, the shift to a supports paradigm as part of the response to person-environment fit models is examined, along with a discussion pertaining to a series of measures of support needs.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Michael Wehmeyer, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas

Ph.D. distinguished professor at the University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.

Referências

ALMEIDA, Maria Amelia, BOUERI, Iasmin Zanchi; POSTALLI, Lidia Maria Marson. A Escala de Intensidade de Suporte–SIS no Brasil. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, vol. 16, pp. 60-64. 2016.

BUNTINX, Wil H. E. Understanding disability: A strengths-based approach. In Michael Lee Wehmeyer (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability (pp. 7-18). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 2013.

COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. General comment No. 4. 2016. Disponível em: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/article-24-education.html. Acesso em 05 Ago. 2020.

EVANS, Dave. The Internet of Things: How the Next Evolution of the Internet Is Changing Everything. 2011. San Jose, CA: Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group (IBSG). Disponível em: https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/ac79/docs/innov/IoT_IBSG_0411FINAL.pdf. Acesso em: 05 Ago. 2020.

LUCKASSON, Ruth. et al. Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (10th ed.). Washington, DC, US: American Association on Mental Retardation. 2002.

ORKWIS, Raymond; MCLANE, Kathleen. A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for student access. ERIC/OSEP Topical Brief. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children. 1998.

ROSE; David H. et al. Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Design for Learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. 2002.

SHOGREN, Karrie A. et al. Effect of intervention with the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on access and goal attainment. Remedial and Special Education, 33(5), 320-330. 2012.

SHOGREN, Karrie A. et al. Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 48(4), 256-267. 2015.

SHOGREN, Karrie A.; WEHMEYER, Michael Lee; LANE, Kathleen L. Embedding interventions to promote self-determination within multi-tiered systems of supports. Exceptionality, 24(4), 213-244. 2016.

SMITH, J. David; WEHMEYER, Michael Lee. Good blood, bad blood: science, nature and the myth of the Kallikaks. Washington DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2012.

THOMPSON, James R. et al. Supports Intensity Scale-Children’s Version: user’s Manual. Washington, D.C., American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2016a.

THOMPSON, James R. et al. Person-centered planning with the Supports Intensity Sclae-Adult Version: a Guide for Planning Teams. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2016b.

THOMPSON, James R. et al. Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 135-146. 2009.

THOMPSON, James R. et al. Supports Intensity Scale –Adult Version: users manual. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2015.

THOMPSON, James R. et al. Supports Intensity Scale: standardization and users manual. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation. 2004.

THOMPSON, James R. et al. Supports Intensity Scale-Adult Version Annual Review Protocol. Washington DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2017.

THOMPSON, James R., WEHMEYER, Michael Lee; HUGHES, Carolyn. Mind the gap! Implications of person-environment fit models of intellectual disability for students, educators, and schools. Exceptionality, 18, 168-181. 2010.

WEHMEYER, Michael Lee et al. Establishing a causal relationship between interventions to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. Journal of Special Education, 46(4), 195 – 210. 2012a.

WEHMEYER, Michael Lee et al. Support needs of adults with intellectual disability across domains: The role of technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(2), 11-22. 2012b.

WEHMEYER, Michael Lee. The story of intellectual disability: an evolution of meaning, understanding, and public perception. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. 2013a.

WEHMEYER, Michael Lee. Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 2013b.

WEHMEYER, Michael Lee. Strength-based approaches to educating all learners with disabilities: beyond special education. New York: Teachers College Press. 2019.

WEHMEYER, Michael Lee; ZHAO, Yong. Teaching students to become self-determined learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. 2020.

ZHAO, Yong. World class learners: Educating creative and entrepreneurial students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. 2012.

Publicado

2020-11-17

Como Citar

Wehmeyer, M. (2020). Strengths-based approaches to disability, the supports paradigm, and the importance of the supports intensity scales. Revista Educação Especial, 33, e65/ 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5902/1984686X48249

Edição

Seção

Dossiê: Entre lugares locais e globais das pesquisas, políticas e práticas em Educação Especial e Inclusão Escolar