Epiedaphic fauna in different agroecosystems obtained by Pitfall traps and Provid methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509874029Keywords:
Soil fauna, Edaphic diversity, Sampling methodsAbstract
In this study, the objective was to evaluate the epiedaphic fauna in different agroecosystems using two sampling methods. Organisms were sampled in four agroecosystems: (i) corn cultivation, (ii) Brachiaria ruziziensis cultivation, (iii) silvopastoral system, and (iv) secondary forest remnant. In each agroecosystem, 5 Pitfall traps and 5 Provid traps were installed at a distance of 10 meters and kept in the field for three days. The sampled organisms were classified at the lowest possible taxonomic level and the data obtained were analyzed using Shannon's diversity and Simpson's dominance indices, and principal component analysis. The Pitfall traps method resulted in greater abundance of the epiedaphic community compared to the Provid traps method. The corn cultivation area had greater abundance compared to the other agroecosystems evaluated. The best ecological index was observed in the B. ruziziensis crop, using both methods. The areas of corn cultivation and silvopastoral system were separated by the two methods, by principal component analysis, with a greater number of groups associated with the area cultivated with B. ruziziensis and the secondary forest remnant.
Downloads
References
AKHILA, A.; ENTOORI, K. Role of earthworms in soil fertility and its impact on agriculture: A review. International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies, Nova Delhi, v. 9, n. 3, p. 55-63, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.faunajournal.com/archives/2022/vol9issue3/PartA/9-3-7-702.pdf. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2022.
ALVARES, C. A. et al. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrif, Stuttgart, v. 22 n. 6, p. 711–728, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.schweizerbart.de/papers/metz/detail/22/82078/Koppen_s_climate_classification_map_for_Brazil. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2022.
ANTONIOLLI, Z. A. et al. Método alternativo para estudar a fauna do solo. Ciência Florestal, Santa Maria, v. 16, n. 4, p. 407-417, 2006. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5902/198050981922. Acesso em: 12 mar. 2018.
AZEVEDO, F. R. et al. Composição da entomofauna da Floresta Nacional do Araripe em diferentes vegetações e estações do ano. Ceres, Viçosa, v. 58, n. 6, p. 740-748, 2011. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/rceres/a/vz9mvyz6LsL8NFmjg3kNBqC/?lang=pt. Acesso em: 16 jul. 2022.
BALIN, N. M. et al. Fauna edáfica sob diferentes sistemas de manejo do solo para produção de cucurbitáceas. Scientia Agraria, Curitiba, v. 18, n. 3, p. 74-84, 2017. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufpr.br/agraria/article/view/52133/33595. Acesso em: 12 mar. 2022.
BEAUMELLE, L. et al. Soil fauna diversity and chemical stressors: a review of knowledge gaps and roadmap for future research. Ecography, Sweden, v. 4, n. 6, p. 845-859, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05627. Acesso em: 23 out. 2022.
BEDANO, J. C. et al. Influence of three different land management practices on soil mite (Arachnida: Acari) densities in relation to a natural soil. Applied Soil Ecology, v. 32, n. 3, p. 293-304, 2006. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.07.009. Acesso em: 09 maio 2023.
BÜNEMANN, E. K. et al. Soil quality – A critical review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Elmsford, v. 120: p. 105-125, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071718300294. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2022.
COYLE, D. R. et al. Soil fauna responses to natural disturbances, invasive species, and global climate change: Current state os the science ans a call to action. Soil Biology and Biochemestry, Elmsford, v. 110, p. 116-133, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.03.008. Acesso em 14 set. 2022.
CRUZ, C. D. Genes Software – extended and integrated with the R, Matlab and Selegen. Acta Scientiarum, Maringá, v. 38, n. 4, p. 547-552, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/asagr/a/sLvDYF5MYv9kWR5MKgxb6sL/?lang=en. Acesso em: 14 jul. 2019.
DANELUZ, D. et al. Macrofauna epiedáfica associada a solos submetidos a diferentes usos. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física, Recife, v. 14, n. 7, p. 3867-3880, 2021. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/rbgfe/article/view/250056. Acesso em: 07 out. 2022.
DERENGOSKI, J. A. et al. Metodologias de coleta na avaliação da comunidade epígea em fragmento floresta ciliar. Revista Científica Rural, Bagé, v. 21, n. 2, p. 62-76, 2019. Disponível em: http://revista.urcamp.tche.br/index.php/RCR/article/view/2671. Acesso em: 19 jul. 2022.
FERREIRA, C. R. et al. Edaphic arthropods in different successional stages of Atlantic forest and abandoned pasture areas. Comunicata Scientiae, Bom Jesus, v. 8, n. 2, p. 296-306, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.comunicatascientiae.com.br/comunicata/article/view/1750. Acesso em: 13 ago. 2022.
FERREIRA, C. S. et al. Soil fauna changes across Atlantic Forest succession. Comunicata Scientiae, Bom Jesus, v. 9, n. 2, p. 162-174, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.comunicatascientiae.com.br/comunicata/article/view/2388. Acesso em: 27 set. 2022.
FORSTALL-SOSA, K. S. et al. Soil macroarthropod community and soil biological quality index in a green manure farming system of the Brazilian semi-arid. Biologia, v. 76, p. 907-917, 2020. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.2478/s11756-020-00602-y. Acesso em: 17 dez. 2022.
FREIBERG, J.A. et al. Increased grazing intensity in pastures reduces the abundance and richness of ground spiders in an integrated crop-livestock system. Agronomy for Sustainable Developmen, 40, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0604-0
FUJII, S.; TAKEDA, H. Succession of soil microarthropod communities during the aboveground and belowground litter decomposition processes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Elmsford, v. 110, p. 95-102, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.03.003. Acesso em: 19 set. 2022.
GARDINER, T. Grazing and Orthoptera: a review. Journal of Orthoptera Research, 3-11, 2018.
GÓES, Q. R. et al. Análise da fauna edáfica em diferentes usos do solo no Bioma Pampa. Ciência Florestal, Santa Maria, v. 31, n. 1, p. 123-144, 2021. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/32130. Acesso em: 14 set. 2022.
GUERRA, W. D.; OLIVEIRA, P. C.; PUJOL-LUZ. Gafanhotos (Orthoptera, Acridoidea) em áreas de cerrados e lavouras na Chapada dos Parecis, Estado de Mato Grosso, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, Curitiba, v. 56, n. 2, p. 228–239, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/rbent/a/TH4BKRJMwyTYdrHz6M6XvmG/?lang=pt&format=pdf. Acesso em: 27 set. 2022.
HAMMER, Ø; HARPER, D. A. T.; RYAN, P. D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1-9, 2001. Disponível em: https://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/past.pdf. Acesso em: 14 jan. 2022.
HARTERREITEN-SOUZA, E. S. et al. Diversity and Spatial Distribution of Predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on Organic Vegetable Fields and Adjacent Habitats in Brazil. Florida Entomologist, Gainesville. 103, n. 2, p. 197-205, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1653/024.103.0207. Acesso em: 05 nov. 2022.
KLEIN, I.; CERICATO, A.; PREUSS, J. F. Entomofauna associada à cultura de milho transgênico (Bt) e convencional no município de Iraceminha, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Unoesc & Ciência, Joaçaba, v. 7, n. 2, p. 167-174, 2016. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/acbs/article/view/11771. Acesso em: 7 out. 2022.
MAGGIOTTO, G. et al. Soil fauna community and ecosystem’s resilience: A food web approach. Acta Oecologica, Esquel, v. 99, p. 103445, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2019.103445. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2022.
MCCUNE, B.; MEFFORD, M. J. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 6.0. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, 2011.
MOLDENKE, A. R. Arthropods. In: BOTTOMLEY, P. J.; ANGLE, J. S.; WEAVER, R. W. (Eds.). Methods of soil analysis: microbiological and biochemical properties. Part 2. Madison: SSSA, 1994, p. 517-542.
MORENTE, M., CAMPOS, M.; RUANO, F. Evaluation of two different methods to measure the effects of the management regime on the olive-canopy arthropod community. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Amsterdam, v. 259, p. 111-118, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.03.003. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2022.
NEHER, D. A.; BARBERCHECK, M. E. Soil microarthropods and soil health: Intersection of decomposition and pest suppression in agroecosystems. Insects, Basel, v. 10, n. 12, 414, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/10/12/414?type=check_update&version=2. Acesso em: 12 nov. 2022.
ODUM, E. P. Ecologia. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 1988.
PEREIRA, J. M. et al. Fauna edáfica e suas relações com atributos químicos, físicos e microbiológicos em Floresta de Araucária. Ciência Florestal, Santa Maria, v. 30, n. 1, p. 242-257, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/cflo/a/7sLkzPHbnzftzH7FNKymyvw/?lang=pt. Acesso em: 27 out. 2022.
RAMÍREZ-BARAJAS, P. J. et al. Diversidad de macro-invertebrados en sistemas silvopastoriles del sur de Quintana Roo, México. Revista de Biología Tropical, San José, v. 67, n. 6, p. 1383-1393, 2019. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v67i6.36944. Acesso em: 11 out. 2022.
ROSA, M.G. et al. Diversity of soil spiders in land use and management systems in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Biota Neotropica, Campinas, v. 19, n. 2, p. e20180619, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/bn/a/L9nMNnpPxzcgkcNBz5t57tw/?lang=en. Acesso em: 03 nov. 2022.
ROSA, M. G. et al. Intensificação do uso do solo pode afetar a biodiversidade de aranhas? Scientia Agraria, Curitiba, v. 19, n. 2. p. 256-265, 2018. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufpr.br/agraria/article/view/55386. Acesso em: 08 set. 2022.
SANTOS, H. G. et al. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 5. ed. rev. ampl. [e-book]. Brasília, DF: Embrapa; 2018.
SHANNON, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, Nova York, v. 27, p. 379-423, 1948. Disponível em: https://people.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/others/shannon/entropy/entropy.pdf. Acesso em: 25 set. 2022.
SILVA, S. I. A. et al. Influência de sistemas de cultivo sobre a comunidade da fauna edáfica no nordeste do Brasil. Ciência Florestal, Santa Maria, v. 32, n. 2, p. 829-855, 2022. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/55320. Acesso em: 16 set. 2022.
TRIGOS-PERAL, G. et al. Ant communities and Solidago plant invasion: Environmental properties and food sources. Entomological Science, v. 21, n. 3, p. 270–278, 2018. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ens.12304. Acesso em: 01 set. 2022.
WIESMEIER, M. et al. Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils - a review of drivers and indicators at various scales. Geoderma, Amsterdam, v, 333, p. 149-162, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016706117319845. Acesso em: 06 nov. 2022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ciência Florestal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A revista CIÊNCIA FLORESTAL reserva-se o direito de realizar, nos originais, alterações de ordens normativas, ortográficas e gramaticais, com vistas a manter o padrão escolar da língua, mas respeitando o estilo dos autores. As provas finais podem ou não ser enviadas aos autores.
