Analysis of the edaphic fauna in different soil uses in the Pampa Biome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509832130Keywords:
Provid method, Soil biodiversity, Soil qualityAbstract
The soil is populated by thousands of organisms which are responsible for various ecosystem functions. Among these organisms, those belonging to the soil fauna stand out and present a great sensitivity, responding to modifications in the environment, and may be regarded as a good soil quality bioindicator. This work aimed to characterize the edaphic fauna distribution in different soil uses and at different seasons of the year in São Gabriel, RS state, evaluating its use as a bio-indicator of the soil quality. Soil fauna evaluations were conducted in three areas of different soil uses: native forest, native pasture and ryegrass/soybean, in two distinct seasons (winter and summer). During the samples, the soil temperature, the soil water content and the biomass/litter were also evaluated, to verify the influence that these attributes exert on the soil fauna. The abundance and diversity were evaluated as well as the diversity, uniformity and similarity indexes in the areas were calculated. The results presented a large diversity of edaphic organisms. Collembola, Hymenoptera and Acarina were the groups with greater abundance. Some groups have shown to be sensitive to changes in environmental variables. The area with greater diversity and greater uniformity was the native forest, while the ryegrass/soybean had the least diversity and uniformity. The most similar areas were the native forest and the native pasture in the winter evaluations. The soil fauna presents potential to be used as a soil quality bioindicator.
Downloads
References
ANDERSON, J. M. Why should we care about soil fauna? Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, v. 44, p. 835-842, 2009.
ANTONIOLLI, Z. I. et al. Método alternativo para estudar a fauna do solo. Ciência Florestal, Santa Maria, v. 16, n. 4, p. 407-417, 2007.
AQUINO, A. M. et al. Invertebrate soil macrofauna under different ground cover plantes in the no-till system in the Cerrado. European Journal of Soil Biology, Paris, v. 44, p. 91-97, 2008.
BARETTA, D. et al. Efeito do cultivo do solo sobre a diversidade da fauna do solo no planalto sul catarinense. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 5, n. 2, p. 108-117, 2006.
BARETTA, D. Fauna do solo e outros atributos edáficos como indicadores da qualidade ambiental em áreas com Araucaria angustifolia no Estado de São Paulo. 2007. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia) - Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Piracicaba, 2007.
CARVALHO, P. C. F; BATELLO, C. Access to land, livestock production and ecosystem conservation in the Brazilian Campos biome: the natural grasslands dilemma. Livestock Science, Amsterdam, v. 120, p. 158-162, 2009.
CHAUVAT, M.; ZAITSEV, A. S.; WOLTERS, V. Successional changes of Collembola and soil microbiota during forest rotation. Oecologia, Berlin, v. 137, n. 2, p. 269-276, 2003.
COSSEAU, L. et al. Levantamento de invertebrados epiedáficos em ambiente contaminado por chumbo. Research, Society and Development, Vargem Grande Paulista, v. 9, n. 3, p. e189932738, 2020.
CREPALDI, R. A. et al. Formigas como bioindicadores da qualidade do solo em sistema integrado lavoura-pecuária. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v. 44, n. 5, p. 781-787, 2014.
DUCATTI, F. Fauna edáfica em fragmentos florestais e em áreas reflorestadas com espécies da Mata Atlântica. 2002. Dissertação (Mestrado em Recursos Florestais) - Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Piracicaba, 2002.
GONÇALVES, J. L. M. et al. Reflexos do cultivo mínimo e intensivo do solo em sua fertilidade e na nutrição das árvores. In: GONÇALVES, J. L. M.; BENEDETTI, V. (ed.). Nutrição e fertilização florestal. Piracicaba: IPEF, 2000. p. 1-57.
GONGALSKY, K. B. et al. Diversity of the Soil Biota in Burned Areas (Tver Oblast) of Southern Taiga Forests. Eurasian Soil Science, Moscow, v. 49, p. 358-366, 2016.
JACCARD, P. Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bulletin de la Socieété Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, [s. l.], v. 44, p. 223-270, 1908.
JEREZ-VALLE, C. et al. A simple bioindication method to discriminate olive orchard management types suing the soil arthropod fauna. Applied Soil Ecology, Pretty, v. 76, p. 42-51, 2014.
KLADIVKO, E. J. Tillage Systems and soil ecology. Soil & Tillage Research, Amsterdam, v. 61, p. 61-76, 2001.
LAVELLE, P. et al. Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Biology, Jersey, v. 42, n. 1, p. 3-15, 2006.
LIMA, H. V. et al. Indicadores de qualidade do solo em sistemas de cultivo orgânico e convencional no semi-árido cearense. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Viçosa, MG, v. 31, p. 1085-1098, 2007.
MAAß, S.; CARUSO, T.; RILLIG, M.C. Functional role of microarthropods in soil aggregation. Pedobiologia, Wageningen, v. 58, p. 59-63, 2015.
MELO, F. V. et al. A importância da meso e macrofauna do solo na fertilidade e como biondicadores. Boletim Informativo da SBCS, p. 38-42, jan./abr. 2009.
MORENTE, M., CAMPOS, M.; RUANO, F. Evaluation of two different methods to measure the effects of the management regime on the olive-canopy arthropod community. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Amsterdam, v. 259, p. 111-118, 2018.
PASQUALIN, L. P. et al. Macrofauna edáfica em lavouras de cana-de-açúcar e mata do noroeste do Paraná – Brasil. Semina, Londrina, v. 33, p. 7-18, 2012.
PESSOA, M. L. (org.). Clima do RS. In: PESSOA, M. L. (org.). Atlas FEE. Porto Alegre: FEE, 2017. Disponível em: http://atlas.fee.tche.br/rio-grande-do-sul/socioambiental/clima/. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2020.
REICHERT, J. M.; REINERT, D. J.; BRAIDA, J. A. Qualidade do solo e sustentabilidade de sistemas agrícolas. Ciência &Ambiente, Santa Maria, v. 27, n. 1, p. 29-48, 2003.
ROESCH, L. F. W. et al. The Brazilian Pampa: a fragile biome. Diversity, Basel, v. 1, p. 182-198, 2009.
SANGINGA, N.; MULONGOY, K.; SWIFT, M. J. Contribution of soil organisms to the sustainability and productivity cropping systems in the tropics. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Amsterdam, v. 41, n. 2, p. 135-152, 1992.
SAS INSTITUTE. Enterprises Guide. Version 4.2. Cary, 2008.
SILVA, D. A. A. et al. Bioindicadores de qualidade edáfica em diferentes usos do solo. Enciclopédia Biosfera, Goiânia, v. 11 n. 22, p. 3728-3736, 2015.
SILVA, R. F. et al. Macrofauna invertebrada do solo sob diferentes sistemas de produção em Latossolo da região do cerrado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, v. 41, p. 697-704, 2006.
SOUTO, P. C. et al. Comunidade microbiana e mesofauna edáfica em solo sob Caatinga no semiárido da Paraíba. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Viçosa, MG, v. 32, n. 1, p. 151-160, 2008.
VILARDO, G. et al. Soil arthropod composition differs between old-fields dominated by exotic plant species and remnant native grasslands. Acta Oecologica, Paris, v. 91, p. 57-64, 2018.
